header LOCAL_RX_SUBJECT Subject =~ /[a-z](RX)[a-z]/
Take the parends out. They aren't doing anything for you, and since they
are a capturing group they will really slow things down.
Loren
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 17:55, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:47:38PM +0200, Paul Tenfjord wrote:
> > header LOCAL_RX_SUBJECT Subject =~ /[a-z](RX)[a-z]/
>
> (ignoring anything else in this subject)
> There's no reason to capture the string "RX", so you can remove the
> par
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:47:38PM +0200, Paul Tenfjord wrote:
> header LOCAL_RX_SUBJECT Subject =~ /[a-z](RX)[a-z]/
(ignoring anything else in this subject)
There's no reason to capture the string "RX", so you can remove the
parens.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It's not that we're afraid ...
Thank you for that hint, however I still only get about 50% hit on such
messages.
Using the rule Mr -=W=- ( :-) ) provided, and rewriting it to :
header LOCAL_RX_SUBJECT Subject =~ /[a-z](RX)[a-z]/
I feel confident that this rule will not cause false positives.
The Subject must contain RX with
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006, Paul Tenfjord wrote:
> I am using the following SARE rulesets :
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_STOCKS TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
> SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1 SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_FRAUD SARE_OEM"
> They have not once detected this type of spam, do have a
I am using the following SARE rulesets :
TRUSTED_RULESETS="SARE_STOCKS TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1 SARE_REDIRECT_POST300 SARE_SPECIFIC SARE_FRAUD SARE_OEM"
They have not once detected this type of spam, do have a set that actually do?
Example of one of the RX t
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
>HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.1.4
No network tests? No SARE rulesets? Those are the low-hanging fruit
you should check first.
And you probably should turn off autolearning.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZI
. August
2006 05:03
An: D Ivago;
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: problem with RX
subjects
As an end user who is receiving these spams despite a
functioning SA installation, I sure hope you figure out how to get them stopped.
Also the stock ones. I'll keep monitoring the list and
cheer
- Original Message -
*From:* D Ivago <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*To:* users@spamassassin.apache.org
<mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
*Sent:* Monday, August 28, 2006 6:44 PM
*Subject:* problem with RX subjects
Hello,
I'm running RH EL4 wit
ssage -
From:
D Ivago
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:44
PM
Subject: problem with RX subjects
Hello,I'm running RH EL4 with SA 3.1.4 and
postfix/procmail.Last week I moved that mailserver to a datacenter and
I'm not sure if it
Hello,I'm running RH EL4 with SA 3.1.4 and postfix/procmail.Last week I moved that mailserver to a datacenter and I'm not sure if it's related, but since then I get more spam then ever. The server is now connected with 1 NIC on a
192.168.*.* subnet and routed via a h/w firewall to the internet, b
11 matches
Mail list logo
