Re: prefork error

2008-06-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.06.08 13:20, raulbe wrote: > Couple new errors now :( > > config: cannot write to /var/spool/uucp/.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such > file or directory > > > spamd[19476]: spamd: processing message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > for uucp:10 there are independent on those you reported before... S

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, June 20, 2008 22:38, raulbe wrote: > Were can i find these settings? perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Bayes plenty of info there :) > would it be in spamassassin.bayes_rules or > 23_bayes.cf no in local.cf or user_prefs Benny Pedersen Need more we

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Kris Deugau
raulbe wrote: Were can i find these settings? would it be in spamassassin.bayes_rules or 23_bayes.cf As with all site-local settings, the Bayes options should go in a .cf file in your site config dir - typically either /etc/mail/spamassassin/ or /etc/spamassassin/. local.cf is usually conve

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread raulbe
og data from both SA and > other sources) or fiddle the SA source so that those messages get sent > with a "debug" priority, and set syslog to not log debug-priority > messages. > > Unless you're *really* horribly short on disk (I can recall a few > systems I migh

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Kris Deugau
raulbe wrote: What I did was turn off auto_learn and that cleared up the error. So would doing this would it affect how bayes works or? Well, yes. All Bayes training will now have to be done manually. What's usually a slightly better idea for a global Bayes database is to set these Bayes opt

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread raulbe
advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/prefork-error-tp17989187p18036734.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread raulbe
chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/prefork-error-tp17989187p18035422.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fredag, 20/6 2008, 16:55, raulbe wrote: > So should the entry look like this? > confQUEUE_LA=1 > confREFUSE_LA=1 this is based on load avage > confDELAY_LA =1 this is based on deley secunds (keep this litte more then your scan time pr mail) with 1 you scan every email/spam in just one sec,

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.06.08 08:18, raulbe wrote: > Now if I can figure out why I keep getting the bayes.lock error any clues? > Jun 20 11:02:41 ws096 spamd[20261]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases > /home/nuonce/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists do you have autolearning turned on? what about j

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread raulbe
> see them? >> > >> > you'll see them in cf.README(.gz) and you can add them to sendmail.mc > > -- > Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ > Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 20.06.08 07:55, raulbe wrote: > So should the entry look like this? > > > confQUEUE_LA=1 > confREFUSE_LA=1 > confDELAY_LA =1 as you wish, I have those higher. My machine can handle load of 1.0 very well and so I expect yours. I have those set to (3,5,unset). instead of DELAY_LA I use FEATU

Re: prefork error

2008-06-20 Thread raulbe
-mail advertising to this address. > Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. > Saving Private Ryan... > Private Ryan exists. Overwrite? (Y/N) > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/prefork-error-tp17989187p18031229.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 19.06.08 13:54, raulbe wrote: > were do I find these lines? > confQUEUE_LA > confREFUSE_LA > confDELAY_LA > I looked in both the sendmail.cf file and the sendmail.mc file and didnt > see them? you'll see them in cf.README(.gz) and you can add them to sendmail.mc -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas,

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread raulbe
settings help on the specifik problem you have that > sendmail > accepts to much msgs at once so migh need to be adjusted > > and i use postfix so my advice can be bogus, but i belive it this > > > Benny Pedersen > Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cus

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread David B Funk
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008, raulbe wrote: > > I am using sendmail as my mta > > > # rpm -q sendmail > sendmail-8.13.1-3.2.el4 > > > What wierd is that the error clears up and then starts again after a while. > Also I noticed we are getting hit with a considerable amount of spam. Plus I > think our spamas

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Torsdag, 19/6 2008, 18:37, raulbe wrote: > I also notice this error in the maillog > spamd: still running as root: user not specified with -u, not found, or set > to root, falling back to nobody make a bug on this issue to your distro, its not really a bug but it could be solved in the rpm f

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Torsdag, 19/6 2008, 18:36, raulbe wrote: > > I am using sendmail as my mta http://www.sendmail.org/m4/tweaking_config.html adjust confQUEUE_LA confREFUSE_LA confDELAY_LA delay is default 0, but in your case it should be little more then what time spamd uses pr scan msgs all the abouve sett

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread raulbe
>> be >>> causing the server not to be able to handle all the processes? >> >> problem might be that you mta accepts to much spam, or even to much >> connections that your spamd cant handle at once :/ >> >> tell us what mta you use >> >&

Re: prefork error

2008-06-19 Thread raulbe
w.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098 > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/prefork-error-tp17989187p18013023.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: prefork error

2008-06-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, June 18, 2008 20:36, raulbe wrote: > What I did was edit etc/sysconfig/spamassassin and up the max from 8 to 10 > now that worked for a while but now the error has returned. What could be > causing the server not to be able to handle all the processes? problem might be that you mta acce

prefork error

2008-06-18 Thread raulbe
10 now that worked for a while but now the error has returned. What could be causing the server not to be able to handle all the processes? Thanks again -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/prefork-error-tp17989187p17989187.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list