Re: My emails are blocked when I ask for help (murder!) In need help!

On 2022-07-13 at 09:08:23 UTC-0400 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:08:23 +0300) Tomas Ukkonen is rumored to have said: Hello I'm asking for help online when I'm being murdered! Hyperbole is not your friend. This list is NOT a general support forum. It is specifically for users of the Apache Software

My emails are blocked when I ask for help (murder!) In need help!

Hello I'm asking for help online when I'm being murdered! Police investigation showed there are people who want to murder me and hospital gives me experimental toxic treatment without reason. I cannot survive this treatment. When I ask for help online using emails spam systems are blocki

Re: Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

On 21.08.2014 09:20, Michael wrote: So that means, that actually I do not have to do any action on newly created users. Once they retrain their first message, the Bayes entries are getting created. Before that, Bayes is not used for that user. Is that correct? Yes, I would say it correct. To

Re: Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

Thanks for pointing me into the right direction. That helped me solve the issue. In fact there was no issue. I just had to run "sa-learn -u --spam < miss-classified-message.txt". This command added some content into the Bayes tables and the warning in the debug output was gone. So that m

Re: Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

Hi. I did test a similar configuration a while ago and had the same problem. If you take a look at this thread on the mailing list: http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Bayes-vars-records-on-MySQL-not-created-automatically-td104615.html you'll see it was a problem of running 'sa-learn --sy

Need help with setting up MySQL storage for SA

Hi, I'm using Spamassassin in a virtual user environment. To store preferences like settings, Bayes and AWL for each user I'm trying to set up a MySQL storage. I created the MySQL tables according the instructions from the files awl_mysql.sql, bayes_mysql.sql, README.awl, README.bayes, REA

Re: SA-3.2 need help

Anshul Chauhan wrote: > > This rule is in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf > as FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 and in > /var/lib/spmassassin//3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org as #score > FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 2.075 3.384 3.554 3.188 # n=2 i've commented the > line in /var/lib/spamassassin. >

Re: SA-3.2 need help

This rule is in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf as FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0 and in /var/lib/spmassassin//3.002004/updates_spamassassin_org as #score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 2.075 3.384 3.554 3.188 # n=2 i've commented the line in /var/lib/spamassassin. How can i set spamassassin as to not check my local

Re: SA-3.2 need help

On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:16 +0530, Tux Techie wrote: > I've inserted "score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0" without the quotes to the > end of your local.cf file to disable the rule for 2010 bug. According to the timestamps the samples are older than your mail. Assuming you restarted spamd, these hits shoul

Re: SA-3.2 need help

Tux Techie wrote: > > > I've inserted "score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0" without the quotes to the > end of your local.cf file to disable the rule for > 2010 bug. > You need to double-check this entry and then restart spamd since the rule is still hitting on all of the examples you g

Re: SA-3.2 need help

I've inserted "score FH_DATE_PAST_20XX 0" without the quotes to the end of your local.cf file to disable the rule for 2010 bug. If i'm upgrading SA to 3.3.1, my mail processing is very slow and my server load average is going up. I've googled all the stuff in my local.cf its not inherited from

Re: SA-3.2 need help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/22/10 10:45 AM, Tux Techie wrote: > I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my > mail server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with My first guess without seeing real samples would

Re: SA-3.2 need help

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 21:15 +0530, Tux Techie wrote: > I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my mail > server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with > sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4 [ massive snip ] > This is my /etc/procmailrc > > D

Re: SA-3.2 need help

Tux Techie wrote: > > > hi, > > I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my > mail server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with > sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4 > > This is my local.cf <http://l

SA-3.2 need help

hi, > > I'm new to linux and Need help in configuring spamassassin on my mail > server,I'm using spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el4.1 on CentOS4 with > sendmail-8.13.1-3.3.el4 > > This is my local.cf > > > > # This is the right place to customize your installation of

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

On 29-Nov-2009, at 04:59, Jonas Eckerman wrote: > I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA install) would > pay to use the better DNSBLs. I've found pretty much the opposite; the larger the ISP, the worse job they do filtering spam for their customers. The only exception i

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

On søn 29 nov 2009 12:59:32 CET, Jonas Eckerman wrote I'd assume that a big ISP using SA (and wants the best from SA install) would pay to use the better DNSBLs. ask recipient if a isp does a well good job of stopping spam to ones inbox, payed dnsbl or not :=) shared rbl listes is silly, s

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Martijn Grooten wrote: - I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free; This doesn't make any sense. You are comparing SA to commercial products

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Alex wrote: Hi, - I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free; Do the commercial vendors get to use publically-available DNSBLs like zen?

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Martijn Grooten wrote: All, a few months back, there was a discussion on this list about the VBSpam comparative anti-spam tests[1], in which SpamAssassin performed significantly worse than many commercial products. Now I run these tests and I believe something was the matter with (the installati

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Hi, >> - I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and >> open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and >> unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free; Do the commercial vendors get to use publically-available DNSBLs like zen? If so, and

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Martijn Grooten wrote: - I'm happy to add any extensions as long as these are also free and open source -- note that our 'target audience' includes big ISPs and unfortunately for them things as Spamhaus's RBL aren't free; I'm not in any way trying to jump on what you're trying to do as I firm

Re: Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

Martijn, I may be missing something here but I went to your website and you use the terms "malware" and "spam" interchangeably. Now, it may be true that these days in the commercial realm that the antivirus vendors are all jumping into the anti-spam market to enhance revenue, but in reality

Need help running SA in a (comparative) anti-spam test

All, a few months back, there was a discussion on this list about the VBSpam comparative anti-spam tests[1], in which SpamAssassin performed significantly worse than many commercial products. Now I run these tests and I believe something was the matter with (the installation of) SA that made it pe

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

On 5-Apr-2009, at 06:07, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 05.04.09 01:56, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. [...] :0: * ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* Maildir/10/new Maildir/10/new is not a maildir, is it? Maildir/10/ may be a maildir,

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

> i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. > 10 or more --> directory 10 > 9 --> directory 9 > > and so one > > But - nothing happens - the mails are all in the /Maildir/new directory Given your last recipe, Maildir/new isn't a directory but an mbox formatted file. Was that a stra

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

On 05.04.09 01:56, sebast...@debianfan.de wrote: > i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. [...] > :0: > * ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* > Maildir/10/new Maildir/10/new is not a maildir, is it? Maildir/10/ may be a maildir, if it is, use Maildir/10/, don't add /new there. --

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

Jeff Mincy wrote: >From: "sebast...@debianfan.de" >Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:56:38 +0200 > >Hello, > >i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. > > This is more of a procmail question, so it doesn't actually belong here. > It's related to using SpamAssassin,

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

sebastian wrote: > i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. > > > The header of message > > X-Spam-Level: ** > > I want to sort mails into some different directories. > [snip] > :0: > * ^X-Spam-Level: .*\(\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* -^^ You are quoting a

Re: need help - procmail & spamassassin

From: "sebast...@debianfan.de" Date: Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:56:38 +0200 Hello, i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. This is more of a procmail question, so it doesn't actually belong here. The header of message X-Spam-Level: ** I

need help - procmail & spamassassin

Hello, i am filtering mails with spamassassin & procmail. The header of message X-Spam-Level: ** I want to sort mails into some different directories. 10 or more --> directory 10 9 --> directory 9 and so one But - nothing happens - the mails are all in the /Maildir/new

Re: Need help wityh reverse mortgages for seniors.

On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:16:34AM -0500, Steven W. Orr wrote: > I'm getting a lot of spam that gets through that's trying to sell > reverse mortages to seniors. I put a baker's dozen samples at > > http://steveo.syslang.net/sen.txt > > The samples are raw, but a text rendered example looks rough

Re: Need help wityh reverse mortgages for seniors.

> Maybe Justin nees to set up a SOUGHT_LOANS corpus and ruleset? :) Already part of JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD, which ships with the general sought update channel. And no, it is no fun reading these to provide a specialized high quality corpus for fraud... *sigh* guenther -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...

Re: Need help wityh reverse mortgages for seniors.

On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Steven W. Orr wrote: I'm getting a lot of spam that gets through that's trying to sell reverse mortages to seniors. I put a baker's dozen samples at http://steveo.syslang.net/sen.txt The samples are raw, but a text rendered example looks roughly like one I put below. Does

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

Ned Slider wrote: Henrik K wrote: To be more specific: Hostname may end optionally to a dot, with :port, /slash or nothing following m{^https?://[^.:/]+\.[^.:/]+\.?(?:$|[:/])} Could anyone please provide a reference or explanation of the use of m{blah} in spamassassin uri rules? Than

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

Henrik K wrote: To be more specific: Hostname may end optionally to a dot, with :port, /slash or nothing following m{^https?://[^.:/]+\.[^.:/]+\.?(?:$|[:/])} Could anyone please provide a reference or explanation of the use of m{blah} in spamassassin uri rules? Thanks

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Dennis Hardy wrote: How about: /:\/\/[^.\/]+\.[^\.\/]+\// Hi John, sweet, this seems to work! Could you help me with how to add a list of "com|net|info|biz|etc" before the closing "/", so it will match against a list of known TLDs? /:\/\/[^.\/]+\.(?:com|net|info|

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

ew this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/need-help-with-spamassassin-URI-rule-tp20897907p20899285.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 08:52:46AM -0800, John Hardin wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Dennis Hardy wrote: > >> What I would like to match on is URLs that do _not_ start with a third level >> domain entry, and end with ".com", ".biz", ".info", etc. For example, >> "http://hello.com/"; (followed by mor

Re: need help with spamassassin URI rule

On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Dennis Hardy wrote: What I would like to match on is URLs that do _not_ start with a third level domain entry, and end with ".com", ".biz", ".info", etc. For example, "http://hello.com/"; (followed by more stuff) would match, and "http://www.hello.com/{...}"; would _not_ mat

need help with spamassassin URI rule

.net/"; would. Is this possible with perl regexps? I've spent hours trying variations of different URI rules, but none of them work (they always match the "www." as well). Here are some of my feeble attempts: [^w]{3}.*\.com\/ ^(?:http?:\/\/)?[^\/]+(?http://www.n

Re: need help creating a rule for this type of spam

thanks! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/need-help-creating-a-rule-for-this-type-of-spam-tp20425116p20427622.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: need help creating a rule for this type of spam

On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 10:11 -0800, dave128 wrote: > the e-mail servers are always different, as are the addresses at the bottom. > the only real "pattern" I can see is that the SPAM always includes > references like this: > > http://fsbonh.com/MxAGpeMvMAvGivpYpYpYexvAiMHOGp > > so each message

need help creating a rule for this type of spam

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/need-help-creating-a-rule-for-this-type-of-spam-tp20425116p20425116.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

Martin Gregorie a écrit : > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:01 +0200, mouss wrote: >> Why do you guys put a '.*' there? This would also match >> > Fair cop, guv, on both counts. > > I spotted that '[.*]' didn't do what the OP wanted and didn't look any > further. Obviously, > ^X-Spam-Status:[ \t]

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:01 +0200, mouss wrote: > Why do you guys put a '.*' there? This would also match > Fair cop, guv, on both counts. I spotted that '[.*]' didn't do what the OP wanted and didn't look any further. Obviously, ^X-Spam-Status:[ \t]{1,40}(Yes|YES) is better than my o

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

Why not use procmail or other similar tool? mathiasadsl wrote: Hi all, I'm currently running a postfix server and spamassassin under Fedora Core 8. Everyhting is OK but i'd like to redirect tagged [SPAM] mails to a mailbox. I did the following: #Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf header_checks = regex

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

Martin Gregorie a écrit : > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 07:05 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > >> OK, i've just tried your new regular expression but it doesnt work better. >> Nothing happened. The email is still tagged as [SPAM] and is delivered to >> user. >> > That's odd. I've just run the following: > >

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

Mariusz Kruk a écrit : > On wto, 2008-10-21 at 05:38 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: >> Ok, it's getting better now but all my emails are forwared to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Even those which are not tagged as [SPAM] >> I guess i have some troubles with the regular expression. >> Can you help me in the s

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 07:05 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > OK, i've just tried your new regular expression but it doesnt work better. > Nothing happened. The email is still tagged as [SPAM] and is delivered to > user. > That's odd. I've just run the following: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ grep '^X-Spam-St

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

Mathiasadsl wrote on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:05:04 -0700 (PDT): > It sounds easy but nothing works. It all depends how and when your SA checks are done. If you are checking in the local postfix phase (which will be the case if you are using procmail - and you will want to use procmail for this redi

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On wto, 2008-10-21 at 14:49 +0100, Martin Gregorie wrote: > > > Ok, it's getting better now but all my emails are forwared to > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Even those which are not tagged as [SPAM] > > > I guess i have some troubles with the regular expression. > > > Can you help me in the syntax

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

expression the following? "If [SPAM] is included in the subjet Redirect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]". It sounds easy but nothing works. Best regards, Mathias -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-Help-For-Redirecting-SPAM-to-a-mailbox-tp20088706p20090989.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On wto, 2008-10-21 at 06:39 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > hi Marius, > > I've check the headers of [SPAM] mails: There's X-Spam-Status: Yes. OK. So the SA seems to be working. > I'm sorry but i'm not familiar with regular express: There is quite a lot of information out there about standard regex

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 14:58 +0200, Mariusz Kruk wrote: > On wto, 2008-10-21 at 05:38 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > > Ok, it's getting better now but all my emails are forwared to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Even those which are not tagged as [SPAM] > > I guess i have some troubles with the regular exp

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

n the first place? Did you look > at headers? > > -- > \.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\.\ Heavy voodoo here. I can't even believe you > [EMAIL PROTECTED] are reading this. Are you crazy? Don't even > \.http://epsilon.eu.org/\.\ think about adjusting these[...](squid.co

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

ortunately, nothing happened, the target user still receive the mail and spam is not forwarded to the "garbadge" mail box. What's wrong with my conf? postfix-2.4.5-2.fc8 spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-Help-For-Redirecting-SPAM-to-a-ma

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

First of all, please don't toppost. It's very annoying. On wto, 2008-10-21 at 06:04 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > I just tried your last syntax: > /^X-Spam-Status:[.*](Yes|YES)/ REDIRECT [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's not my syntax. I pasted it from your mail. > It doesnt work, all mails are normally deli

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

ERS do it with private > members > }-> epsilon.eu.org | and public objects > http:// -/ | > | > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-Help-For-Redirecting-SPAM-to-a-mailbox-tp20088706p20089850.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On wto, 2008-10-21 at 05:38 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > Ok, it's getting better now but all my emails are forwared to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Even those which are not tagged as [SPAM] > I guess i have some troubles with the regular expression. > Can you help me in the syntax issue? Well... strange.

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

/\-\/\-\/\-\/\-\/\-\/\ The macro here has not been followed by the > \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] / required stuff, so I'm ignorig it.(TeX) > / http://epsilon.eu.org/ \ > \/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/-/\/ > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-Help-For-Redirecting-SPAM-to-a-mailbox-tp20088706p20089289.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

On wto, 2008-10-21 at 04:58 -0700, mathiasadsl wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently running a postfix server and spamassassin under Fedora Core 8. > Everyhting is OK but i'd like to redirect tagged [SPAM] mails to a mailbox. > > I did the following: > > #Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf > header_checks =

Need Help For Redirecting SPAM to a mailbox

3.2.3-2.fc8 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-Help-For-Redirecting-SPAM-to-a-mailbox-tp20088706p20088706.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Are Henry's versions of these rules different to what Jack posted below, and if so, where can I find them? I'm still running SA 3.1.8 (unable to upgrade yet) so I wouldn't receive them if you've pushed them to the 3.2 sa-update. Cheers, Jeremy "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in messa

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Justin Mason wrote: http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified bingo! thanks. (wonder why do a rm on the sa-update-keys dir didn't fix that) -- Michael Scheidell, CTO Main: 561-999-5000, Office: 561-939-7259 > *| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation Winner 2008 Techno

Re: Need help with bobax rules

http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/SaUpdateKeyNotCrossCertified --j. Michael Scheidell writes: > > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: Ne

Re: Need help with bobax rules

On Thursday 17 April 2008 6:15 am, Michael Scheidell wrote: > > From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: > > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules > > &g

Re: Need help with bobax rules

> From: Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 14:16:51 +0100 > To: Jack Pepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: > Subject: Re: Need help with bobax rules > > > for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules

Re: Need help with bobax rules

for what it's worth, I just pushed Henry's version of Joe's rules into the 3.2.x sa-updates. --j. Jack Pepper writes: > Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > HI Jack, > > Any chance of sharing your rules for this?! > > > > Cheers, > > Jeremy > > Sure: > > score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Quoting Jeremy Fairbrass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: HI Jack, Any chance of sharing your rules for this?! Cheers, Jeremy Sure: score BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 1.800 header BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 ALL =~ /^Message-Id:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/m describe BOBAX_GEN_SPAM_2 Has Bobax Generated Message-Id, type 2 score

Re: Need help with bobax rules

HI Jack, Any chance of sharing your rules for this?! Cheers, Jeremy "Jack Pepper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This info popped up on the emerging-Threats list. I have watched our mail servers and have confirmed that it works. The problem is that my attempts

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Quoting Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Jack Pepper writes: I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was already catching them. apologies for the noise on the list. I found my problem in the faq. I was missing the "m" on the end ogf the regex: score BOBAX_GEN

Re: Need help with bobax rules

Jack Pepper writes: > I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was > already catching them. > > apologies for the noise on the list. Henry Stern has added rules to SpamAssassin 3.3.0 trunk SVN to implement these. maybe he plans to backport them to 3.2.x sa-updates ;) -

Re: Need help with bobax rules

I guess I don't need those rules. I see now that INVALID_MSGID was already catching them. apologies for the noise on the list. jp -- Framework? I don't need no steenking framework! @fferent Security Labs: Isolate/Insulate/In

Need help with bobax rules

This info popped up on the emerging-Threats list. I have watched our mail servers and have confirmed that it works. The problem is that my attempts to create Spamassin rules for it never fire off. Can I get some tutelage from the list on creating rules for these unique conditions: Messa

Re: We need help with error messages

Quoting Alan Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > We use SPAM Assassin in Silverpop. We have been having a tough time with > the messages and results after running SPAM A. Can someone help? We want a > guide of definitions. > > The latest we got is >> 2.2 REMOVE_BEFORE_LINK BODY: Removal

We need help with error messages

Hi, We use SPAM Assassin in Silverpop. We have been having a tough time with the messages and results after running SPAM A. Can someone help? We want a guide of definitions. The latest we got is >> 2.2 REMOVE_BEFORE_LINK BODY: Removal phrase right before a link Thanks, Alan D Morgan MTD

HUGE SERVER LOAD PROBLEM I NEED HELP URGENT PLEASE!!!!!!!!!

ge as spam and has prevented delivery (100)." message = "The mail server detected your message as spam and has prevented delivery." :super: -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/HUGE-SERVER-LOAD-PROBLEM-I-NEED-HELP-URGENT-PLEASE%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21%21-tf420606

Re: Need help finding an old rule making page.

On 4/6/07 Josh Graham wrote: >Last year there was this page I had bookmarked that was basically a php >form where you enter criteria and it would output Spamassassin rules for >you. SpamAssassin Configuration Generator HTH, Nedry

Re: Need help finding an old rule making page.

On Fri, 6 Apr 2007 12:13:03 -0700, "Josh Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Last year there was this page I had bookmarked that was basically a php >form where you enter criteria and it would output Spamassassin rules for >you. I lost all my bookmarks when a flash drive died, does anyone know >o

Re: Need help finding an old rule making page.

Josh Graham wrote: > Last year there was this page I had bookmarked that was basically a php > form where you enter criteria and it would output Spamassassin rules for > you. I lost all my bookmarks when a flash drive died, does anyone know > of the page I'm talking about? > > I can't remember ex

Need help finding an old rule making page.

Last year there was this page I had bookmarked that was basically a php form where you enter criteria and it would output Spamassassin rules for you. I lost all my bookmarks when a flash drive died, does anyone know of the page I'm talking about? I can't remember exactly but I know "rule generato

Re: Need help with a rule

Sure. header __LOCAL_SENDER From =~ /@example\.com/i meta FORGED_LOCAL_SENDER __LOCAL_SENDER && !TRUSTED_NETWORKS score FORGED_LOCAL_SENDER 1 This depends on a proper setting of TRUSTED_NETWORKS. (Note: untested code, YMMV, etc.) Chris St. Pierre Unix Systems Administrator Nebraska Wes

Re: Need help with a rule

Bill Minton wrote: > I'm looking to have Spamassassin mark messages where the from address > is forged with a valid local address. > > For instance, if a local address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] PROTECTED]> > and a spammer spoofs that, then it initially appears as though > [EMAIL PROTEC

Need help with a rule

I'm looking to have Spamassassin mark messages where the from address is forged with a valid local address. For instance, if a local address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] and a spammer spoofs that, then it initially appears as though [EMAIL PROTECTED] is sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which is ok)

Need help from a Qmail user

I need a little help from someone who has a Qmail server. I'm testing some new spam filtering techniques and need to see if it's qmail compatible. What I'm looking for is someone who has a qmail server that isn't patched to retry the higher MX records on a temporary failure. What I'm looking f

Re: Newbie - Need Help in writing rules

On 26-okt-2006, at 20:07, Chris St. Pierre wrote: On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, san wrote: Hi, How to write a rules to avoid below type of mails or is there a rule already which marks this as spam. Everday i get 3 to 4 mails of this type with one picture image which says GDKI No.1 Entertainment

Re: Newbie - Need Help in writing rules

ability lay am waste or entire so weapons capability even >such modest power? >Quite fully follow suit am decade these of emergent or strong Asian allied >am pound in gorilla every. >Nearly shifting dynamics matrix western side Pacific rim force economic >impose swift solution virtually

Newbie - Need Help in writing rules

virtually always in exists. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Newbie---Need-Help-in-writing-rules-tf2515480.html#a7016203 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

need help in configuring imap-spamassassin.pl file

hey friends, I know this is not the right list to post the queries regarding imap-spamassassin file , I thought may be somebody had tried this script before. I am trying to configure imap-spamassassin.pl on my system and I have edited the file but I am getting the below error when I tried to run

Re: Need help with several things in SA

On Tue, October 10, 2006 12:38 am, Steve Lake said: > Ok, I've got several pesky problems that won't go away and I need some > help. On some emails it automatically flags some as ham and says > "autolearn=ham" and others that say "autolearn=no". I'm guessing that > the autolearn feature isn't alw

RE: Need help with several things in SA

Thanks Matt for this long explanation. I agree with the fact that you should avoid raising rules score or think twice before doing it. A lot of trouble may appear with a rule with a to high score. I got in trouble at the beginning with that. I raised some scores very high (more than 20), and I go

Re: Need help with several things in SA

Steve Lake wrote: > Ok, I've got several pesky problems that won't go away and I > need some help. On some emails it automatically flags some as ham and > says "autolearn=ham" and others that say "autolearn=no". I'm guessing > that the autolearn feature isn't always working. Is there a w

Need help with several things in SA

Ok, I've got several pesky problems that won't go away and I need some help. On some emails it automatically flags some as ham and says "autolearn=ham" and others that say "autolearn=no". I'm guessing that the autolearn feature isn't always working. Is there a way I can completely tu

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers... SOLVED

jdow wrote: From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thekillerbean wrote: thekillerbean wrote: All is good! One last question while on this topic - I was restarting sendmail, spamassassin and spamass-milter whenever I made a change to local.cf in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir - is

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers... SOLVED

From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thekillerbean wrote: thekillerbean wrote: All is good! One last question while on this topic - I was restarting sendmail, spamassassin and spamass-milter whenever I made a change to local.cf in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir - is this really n

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers... SOLVED

thekillerbean wrote: thekillerbean wrote: All is good! One last question while on this topic - I was restarting sendmail, spamassassin and spamass-milter whenever I made a change to local.cf in the /etc/mail/spamassassin dir - is this really necessary or was it overkill? You only need to

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers... SOLVED

View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Need-help-with-SA-and-Received-headers...-tf2252268.html#a6349518 Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users forum at Nabble.com.

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers...

From: "thekillerbean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jdow wrote: Trust in-mtaX.MYISP.com.au. {^_^} Thanks a ton. Now I know that I can simply type in the FQDN! I called my ISP and asked for the subnet range they use for their mail servers and that's what I put in the local.cf file. Nope. I believe

Re: Need help with SA and Received headers...

Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: thekillerbean wrote: Now I know that I can simply type in the FQDN! No, you can't. Single IPs or IP ranges using CIDR notation only. Oh yeah, you can use one, two, or three parts of a dot quad, with a trailing dot, for /8, /16, or /24s too, but IP ranges nonethe

  1   2   >