Re: msa_networks vs. authenticated mail

2011-09-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:57:42 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: iiuc, the msa_networks was created to explicitly tell SA that mail was authenticated. On 17.09.11 00:15, RW wrote: When something relays through a server in msa_networks, anything before that inherits its trusted/internal network

Re: msa_networks vs. authenticated mail

2011-09-16 Thread RW
On Fri, 16 Sep 2011 15:57:42 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > Hello, > > iiuc, the msa_networks was created to explicitly tell SA that mail > was authenticated. When something relays through a server in msa_networks, anything before that inherits its trusted/internal network status. This pr

msa_networks vs. authenticated mail

2011-09-16 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, iiuc, the msa_networks was created to explicitly tell SA that mail was authenticated. Is there a locical difference betwen mail authenticated by MSA in msa_networks and mail authenticated locally, or by internal relay? I mean, do we trust host in msa_networks more than host that aut