Re: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-07 Thread Lucas Albers
Vivek Khera said: > I'm not using Bayes since the filtering is site-wide at the smtp server > level. I use bayes sitewide for 600 users, and have processed a few million messages. Bayes sitewide works well, as the spam email is obviously unlike the normal mail anyone receives. I would enable baye

Re: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Vivek Khera
On Oct 6, 2004, at 6:56 AM, Darren Coleman wrote: - Are you using any additional rulesets from www.rulesemporium.com ? If not why not? :) with so many to choose from, how do you decide which ones to use? there needs to be some sort of user ranking and/or stats on these to help make an informed

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Joey
From: Zsolt Koppany [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 2:27 PM To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade With SA-2.63 I guest that 95% or even more spam was found not approx. 70-80% and now very trival spams come through for example (I replac

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
ECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:06 PM > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: more spam since upgrade > > > > spamassassin --lint passes without any messages. Is that OK or not? > > That is good. Sounds like you have a clean set of config files. >

Re: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Loren Wilton
> spamassassin --lint passes without any messages. Is that OK or not? That is good. Sounds like you have a clean set of config files. If the problem at this point is things leaking through (but you ARE seeing scores, so you know things are basically working) than I would get some SARE rules, plu

Re: more spam since upgrade [Scanned]

2004-10-06 Thread Loren Wilton
> I would like to add more rules, but not sure what to add that isn't already > being handled by SA? The www.rulesemporium.com does mention what SA has > added though is still a little vague on what all has been integrated into SA > and with the timeouts not really wanting to place more on SA unti

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
spamassassin --lint passes without any messages. Is that OK or not? Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:56 PM > To: Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > >

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
We also use spamc/spamd. Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: Tan, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:29 PM > To: Darren Coleman; Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > > > We have gotten better a

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Tan, William
forks as well as having zthe spamd's die every 10 messages to reduce the memory utilization. -Original Message- From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 6:56 AM To: Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade Is the last

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
Sorry, the attached file was empty, here it is again. Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:56 PM > To: Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > > > Is the

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
I have attached the results of: spamassassin -D --lint Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: Darren Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 12:56 PM > To: Zsolt Koppany; Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > > > Is the

Re: more spam since upgrade [Scanned]

2004-10-06 Thread David Thurman
On 10/6/04 5:56 AM, "Darren Coleman" wrote: > I'm sorry to say but you must have some sort of configuration issue with > your install, and I'd suggest to RTFM. I upgraded from 2.64 to 3.00 and > have recently less untagged spam (as expected) as a result. > > - Are you using any additional rulese

Re: UPDATE: more spam since upgrade:

2004-10-06 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:19 AM 10/6/2004 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote: HI List Just to add the results after uploading the spam to the server again. $spamassassin -t -D < US\ Students\ email\ list.msg So why then did the original receive only 3.1? Look at the list of rules matched.. the number of rules hit in the or

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Darren Coleman
October 2004 11:47 > To: Spamassassin > Subject: RE: more spam since upgrade > > Hi, > > since I upgraded to 3.0.0 from 2.63 I get also much more spam and most of > them absolutely trivial for example Xiagra (I replaced 'V' with 'X'), > Xenis > (I re

RE: more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Zsolt Koppany
somebody can help me to fix the problem. Zsolt > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Kinghorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 7:07 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: more spam since upgrade > > > Hi List. > > I have recently upgra

UPDATE: more spam since upgrade:

2004-10-06 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Tom _ From: Thomas Kinghorn Sent: 06 October 2004 07:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : more spam since upgrade Hi List. I have recently upgraded toExim-4.42, Spamassassin 3.0

more spam since upgrade

2004-10-06 Thread Thomas Kinghorn
Hi List. I have recently upgraded toExim-4.42, Spamassassin 3.0 & sa-exim-4.1 The amount of spam slipping through since then has increased dramatically. The scores seem a bit on the low side since upgrading. Below is the message ID and I have attached the mail from which it originates. Any ide