Re: missing tag

2007-06-15 Thread Jerry Durand
On Jun 15, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: always_trust_envelope_sender 1 envelope_sender_header Return-Path Done, thanks.

Re: missing tag

2007-06-15 Thread Mark Martinec
Daryl writes: > Make sure your milter is providing a return path header field so that SA > gets the correct envelope-from address. I believe old versions of > amavisd-new don't do this. If the milter fails to do this SA will end > up using the From: header field value and, yeah, you'll get SPF fai

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Matt Kettler
Jerry Durand wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: > >> Jerry Durand wrote: >>> My message came back tagged as spam, but I have this list >>> whitelisted_from_spf. ??? >> >> It hit SPF_FAIL, thus no SPF based whitelist hit. You may want to >> run the message through s

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Durand
ocal_domains were wrong. The headers below have the return-path and it seems to be working now. I hate intermittent things. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: missing tag Date: June 14, 2007 7:27:47 PM PDT To: users@spamassassin.apache.org Return-

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jerry Durand wrote: On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Jerry Durand wrote: My message came back tagged as spam, but I have this list whitelisted_from_spf. ??? It hit SPF_FAIL, thus no SPF based whitelist hit. You may want to run the message through spamassassin -Dspf

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Durand
On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:36 PM, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote: Jerry Durand wrote: My message came back tagged as spam, but I have this list whitelisted_from_spf. ??? It hit SPF_FAIL, thus no SPF based whitelist hit. You may want to run the message through spamassassin -Dspf to find out why.

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Lindsay Haisley
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 17:09 -0700, Jerry Durand wrote: > This came in with no tag or subject modification. Any idea what's > up? Amavis log follows the message. My guess is that you're using spamc and for some reason it couldn't connect with spamd. If this is the case, spamc will return the em

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Durand
On Jun 14, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Mark Martinec wrote: Most likely reason: recipient domain (durandinterstellar.com) is not considered local. The X-Spam-* headers are inserted only for incoming and all-internal mail, i.e. when recipient is local. Check your @local_domains_maps setting. Mark Tha

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Jerry Durand wrote: My message came back tagged as spam, but I have this list whitelisted_from_spf. ??? It hit SPF_FAIL, thus no SPF based whitelist hit. You may want to run the message through spamassassin -Dspf to find out why. Daryl X-Timeout-Protection: 0 X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.2 X-

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Durand
007 17:09:10 -0700 From: Jerry Durand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: *** JUNK MAIL *** missing tag To: users@spamassassin.apache.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org -- Jerry Durand, Durand Interstellar, Inc. www.interstellar.com t

Re: missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Mark Martinec
Jerry, > This came in with no tag or subject modification. Any idea what's > up? Amavis log follows the message. > (09479-05) Passed, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > quarantine HhrEwzHAq2Ia, Message-ID: <...>, Hits: 10.769 Most likely reason: recipient domain (durandinterstellar.

missing tag

2007-06-14 Thread Jerry Durand
This came in with no tag or subject modification. Any idea what's up? Amavis log follows the message. X-Timeout-Protection: 0 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murder ([unix socket]) by smtp.interstellar.com (Cyrus v2.2.12-OS X 10.4.8) with LMTPA; Thu, 14 Jun 200