Re: still to the problem of missing headers

2011-03-10 Thread Mark Martinec
Margrit, > ...it is a very serious problem... > > Test , from 11 to 13 today... > > I've configured our central system filter (before > transfering mail to receipients) > > ...logging X-Sam-Score/X-SPAM-Report if Score > 5 > there were 160 mails with only such > MISSING_HEADERS ...

Re: still to the problem of missing headers

2011-03-10 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/10/11 9:34 AM, Margrit Lottmann wrote: ...it is a very serious problem... Test , from 11 to 13 today... you have been told more than once. this is not a spamassassin problem. this is a problem with how you are calling spamassassin from your MTA. Why do you ignore the experts? Best way

still to the problem of missing headers

2011-03-10 Thread Margrit Lottmann
...it is a very serious problem... Test , from 11 to 13 today... I've configured our central system filter (before transfering mail to receipients) ...logging X-Sam-Score/X-SPAM-Report if Score > 5 there were 160 mails with only such MISSING_HEADERS ...but all of them were prese

missing headers

2006-12-22 Thread Rich Morin
We're suddenly having a very weird problem. We run SA under procmail from Postfix on Mac OS X. Things were working well. Now, today, I note a lot of mail with expected SA headers missing, e.g. Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on mini.cfcl