In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Mike
Bostock said ...
> In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Benoit
> Panizzon said ...
> > Hi
> > > What are the pros and cons?
> > In my opinion, an email should eith
In your message regarding Re: milter vs spamc dated 15/01/2024, Benoit
Panizzon said ...
> Hi
> > What are the pros and cons?
> In my opinion, an email should either be received by a MTA and
> delivered to the recipient, or rejected during the SMTP phase.
Thanks everyone for
Hi
> The only con is that milter can't apply multiple SA settings when single
> mail has multiple destination users - it only has to use single setting for
> them.
We found a way around this, we use MIMEDefang as Milter and have
built database lookups in the config.
Usually, per user SA settin
On 14.01.24 22:22, Mike Bostock via users wrote:
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
spamass-milter has setting for default user (-U username) that is
Hi
> What are the pros and cons?
In my opinion, an email should either be received by a MTA and
delivered to the recipient, or rejected during the SMTP phase.
This eliminates:
* Emails 'disappearing' (false positives as example)
* Sending late bounces to fake sender when rejected by the LDA
So
Mike Bostock via users skrev den 2024-01-14 23:22:
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
virtual users is hard to support then
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
good, move all system
I currently have users set up with spamc called in .procmailrc
However, I have quite a few aliases/redirects in sendmail virtusertable
who are not being protected by Spamassassin.
Would I be better using the milter?
What are the pros and cons?
How do I redirect spam to a mailbox if I use the mi
