On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, Justin Mason wrote:
quick survey:
Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
I needed to use mass-check a few months ago and could not find it where the
wiki s
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:07:03PM -0600, Larry Nedry wrote:
> Is mass-check currently under development?
Yes and no. The masses directory, and therefore mass-check, are open for
development at any time. I don't think there's a lot of working going on at
any given time though.
> Where is the ap
On 1/31/08 at 10:38 AM + Justin Mason wrote:
>Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Yes, I am. I don't know what's involved in using SVN but I did look at the
SVN tree via the web and at first and second look, it wasn't obvious how to
use the web to easily download
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:38:03AM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
FWIW, there are at least two easy ways to get a full trunk download w/
mass-check and everything else:
svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/trunk
download a tarball from http://svn.apa
Justin Mason wrote:
quick survey:
Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
Good survey, although I highly doubt anyone is using it that wouldn't be
able to get it from SVN with
> quick survey:
>
> Is anyone using mass-check without previously having SVN set up?
> Is this turning out to be a major barrier?
> Should we put mass-check back into the distro?
I *used* to rely on mass-check being in the distro for
dnswl.org-mass-checks, which broke when that part was excluded
On 1/31/2008 11:38 AM, Justin Mason wrote:
Matt Kettler writes:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
from SVN directly, I guess.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/sp
Matt Kettler writes:
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> >
> >>> The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
> >>>
> >> from SVN directly, I guess.
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
from SVN directly, I guess.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/masses ...
Yes. The main idea was to decr
On 1/30/08 at 12:12 PM -0500 Theo Van Dinter wrote:
>So the masses directory was cut, since the only time you'd use that stuff is
>when developing SA or rules, and at that point you can just grab the SVN
>tree since you're probably going to want to use it for the latest code/rules
>anyway.
I imagi
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:07:43PM +, Justin Mason wrote:
> > The big question is, where do the devs think folks should go to get it?
>
> from SVN directly, I guess.
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/masses ...
Yes. The main idea was to decrease the size of our distributio
Matt Kettler writes:
> According to the wiki:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MassCheck
>
> mass-check lives in the masses of the source tarball. This was true for
> SA 3.1.x and older, but 3.2.x no longer includes it.
>
> It can still be grabbed SVN, or even the web interface to SVN,
According to the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/MassCheck
mass-check lives in the masses of the source tarball. This was true for
SA 3.1.x and older, but 3.2.x no longer includes it.
It can still be grabbed SVN, or even the web interface to SVN, but the
wiki should point to the co
13 matches
Mail list logo
