Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:41:53PM -0500, Gabriel Wachman wrote:
The motivation for this is that I'm comparing a filter a colleague wrote
to various other filters (including SpamAssassin) and I want to make
sure that the summary I give of SpamAssassin in my paper is ac
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:41:53PM -0500, Gabriel Wachman wrote:
> The motivation for this is that I'm comparing a filter a colleague wrote
> to various other filters (including SpamAssassin) and I want to make
> sure that the summary I give of SpamAssassin in my paper is accurate.
> Neural net
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:44:59PM -0500, Gabriel M. Wachman wrote:
The perceptron (form of neural net used in SA 3.0.0 and higher) is used by the
developers to generate the scores prior to release. 99.9% of end-users do not
ever use the perceptron.
By "do not
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:44:59PM -0500, Gabriel M. Wachman wrote:
> > The perceptron (form of neural net used in SA 3.0.0 and higher) is used by
> > the
> > developers to generate the scores prior to release. 99.9% of end-users do
> > not
> > ever use the perceptron.
> >
> By "do not use" do
Matt Kettler wrote:
> Gabriel M. Wachman wrote:
>> It says in the SpamAssassin FAQ that version 3.x uses a neural network
>> to learn scores of messages. Where is the state of this neural network
>> saved? In other words, how does SpamAssassin keep track of the neural
>> network from one invocation
Gabriel M. Wachman wrote:
> It says in the SpamAssassin FAQ that version 3.x uses a neural network
> to learn scores of messages. Where is the state of this neural network
> saved? In other words, how does SpamAssassin keep track of the neural
> network from one invocation to another?
It doesn't k
It says in the SpamAssassin FAQ that version 3.x uses a neural network
to learn scores of messages. Where is the state of this neural network
saved? In other words, how does SpamAssassin keep track of the neural
network from one invocation to another?
