> >3) Find out how much free memory you have without spamd running. ...
> >4) Divide the free memory by your answer from 2. That should give you a
> > good rough-estimate number to work with.
> As an alternative to the above, you can calculate an approximate upper
> limit for "m" by taking the res
At 12:04 PM 05/10/2006, you wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> spamd -m
>
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
>
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and
my VM is at
> 86% right now
As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However,
here
At 12:04 PM 05/10/2006, you wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> spamd -m
>
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
>
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and
my VM is at
> 86% right now
As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However,
here
At 12:04 PM 05/10/2006, you wrote:
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> spamd -m
>
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
>
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and
my VM is at
> 86% right now
As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However,
here
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
>
> spamd -m
>
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
>
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and my VM is at
> 86% right now
As Chris S already said, there's no hard-fast rule here. However, here's a rule
of thumb to start with:
1
On Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 14:27 Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> and what would be an ideal number to set it ?
How many do you have right now?
> I came in this morning , got a bunch of those swap message , and my
> VM is at 86% right now
And which processes consume your memory, and how much?
mfg zmi
Title: RE: limit child process
> -Original Message-
> From: Jean-Paul Natola [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 8:28 AM
> To: ; Matt Kettler
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: RE: limit child process
>
>
&
| Spamd calls it,
|
| But I have seen my monitor , on more than one occasion, with this error,
|
| swap_pager_getswapspace: failed
|
| and the worst part is I don't realize it until I hit the KVM switch , and
| actually get on the console -
|
| so can I customize spamd to a lower limit?
|
| Spamd calls it,
|
| But I have seen my monitor , on more than one occasion, with this error,
|
| swap_pager_getswapspace: failed
|
| and the worst part is I don't realize it until I hit the KVM switch , and
| actually get on the console -
|
| so can I customize spamd to a lower limit?
|
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 4:23 PM
To: Jean-Paul Natola
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: limit child process
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit
Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit the number of SA's child
> processes -
>
> The Perl has been killing swap space, I *believe* this would remedy my
> situation.
>
> Is this the appropriate list, or should I refer to FreeBSD list?
This is the app
Hi all,
I'm trying to figure out where/how to limit the number of SA's child
processes -
The Perl has been killing swap space, I *believe* this would remedy my
situation.
Is this the appropriate list, or should I refer to FreeBSD list?
tia
Jean-Paul Natola
Network Administrator
Infor
12 matches
Mail list logo