On 9/22/2012 4:31 PM, James wrote:
I am lowering the required score to 3.
If I still get spam, I will block everything and just use whitelisting.
SpamAssassin's scores have been set to work best with a required score
of 5. If you find you have to significantly reduce this score to get
good r
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
On 09/23/12 18:28, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
I wrote this little script to update the bayes rules. I can do this on my imap
account but my pop3 account gets way more spam and the messages are no longer
on the machine with sa once
On 09/23/12 18:28, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
>
>> I wrote this little script to update the bayes rules. I can do this on my
>> imap account but my pop3 account gets way more spam and the messages are no
>> longer on the machine with sa once I pop them off.
>>
>> Any
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012, James wrote:
I wrote this little script to update the bayes rules. I can do this on
my imap account but my pop3 account gets way more spam and the messages
are no longer on the machine with sa once I pop them off.
Any comments on my script?
Bear in mind that spams which
On 09/22/12 22:38, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, James wrote:
>> On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
>>> On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
> It didn't help. :-(
> I got spam with a low score.
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=
On Sat, 22 Sep 2012, James wrote:
On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with a low score.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_O
On 09/22/12 20:50, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
>> On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
>>> It didn't help. :-(
>>> I got spam with a low score.
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>>> INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_DB
On 9/22/12 8:36 PM, Glenn Sieb wrote:
> On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
>> It didn't help. :-(
>> I got spam with a low score.
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
>> INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no
>> version=3.3.2
>
On 9/22/12 8:32 PM, James wrote:
> It didn't help. :-(
> I got spam with a low score.
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
> INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RDNS_NONE,URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no
> version=3.3.2
If it's spam, then why does it say "X-Spam-
On 09/22/12 17:11, Daniel McDonald wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/22/12 3:31 PM, "James" wrote:
>
>> Great thanks.
>>
>> I am lowering the required score to 3.
>
> That is generally not a desirable practice.
It didn't help. :-(
I got spam with a low score.
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=3.0 tests
On 9/22/12 3:31 PM, "James" wrote:
> Great thanks.
>
> I am lowering the required score to 3.
That is generally not a desirable practice.
> If I still get spam, I will block everything and just use whitelisting.
I see that you have bayes enabled. You should train your bayes every now
and
oot root 4096 Aug 27 2011 3.003001/
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Sep 21 23:59 3.003002/
>
> Will it use the latest rules or do I need to delete the older ones?
>
> Where in a mail header does it say what version of the rules it used?
> X-Spam-Checker-Version:
massassin service (Ubuntu).
>
> $ /var/lib/spamassassin$ ll
> total 16
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Oct 15 2011 ./
> drwxr-xr-x 45 root root 4096 Jun 12 06:40 ../
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 27 2011 3.003001/
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Sep 21 23:59 3.003002/
>
>
06:40 ../
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Aug 27 2011 3.003001/
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Sep 21 23:59 3.003002/
Will it use the latest rules or do I need to delete the older ones?
Where in a mail header does it say what version of the rules it used?
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-
14 matches
Mail list logo
