On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 23:58:24 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> > Because quite a lot of junk passes while the junk is detected by
> > Pyzor. Just a try to see if that works ;-)
>
> "score RULE_NAME number" is genric and that was my point
>
> Pyzor BTW don't detect junk at it's own, it's a subset and
Richard Lucassen skrev den 2023-06-28 10:46:
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
sure its opensource, just do it :=)
but only in local.cf file, or sql/ldap user prefs
local.cf will be global, while sql/ldap can be global or pr user
in userpref file pr system pam user
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 12:50:28 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> > Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
>
> Yes,
>
> This works the same as a regular score (it is a regular score of
> course). See
> https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCOR
On Wed, 28 Jun 2023 11:17:43 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 28.06.23 um 10:46 schrieb Richard Lucassen:
> > Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
>
> what makes you think that PYZOR_CHECK is more special than any other
> rule?
>
> score PYZOR_CHECK 1.0
Because quite a lo
On 28-06-2023 10:46, Richard Lucassen wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
Yes,
This works the same as a regular score (it is a regular score of
course). See
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#SCORING-OPT
Hello list,
Is it possible to increase the weight of PYZOR_CHECK score?
R.
--
richard lucassen
http://contact.xaq.nl/
