>-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 8:18 AM
>To: Thomas Kinghorn; Spamassassin-Talk
>([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Subject: Re: inconsistencies in message checking
>There's no actual drug names in
Thanks Matt
Regards,
Tom
-Original Message-
>From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 12 October 2004 14:21
>To: martin f krafft
>Cc: Spamassassin-Talk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>Subject: Re: inconsistencies in message checking
>At 09:01 AM 10/12/2004 +020
At 09:01 AM 10/12/2004 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
stop forwarding your spam to lists! cut it to the bare essentials.
Why not? If the example is illustrative of the problem it's perfectly
acceptable for him to forward spam to this list. It's always been that way
on this list. (however, pure mbo
At 07:23 AM 10/12/2004 +0200, Thomas Kinghorn wrote:
I have 2 messages, where the bodies are the same.
No, you have two messages with similar bodies, but they are definitely not
the same.
There's a lot of the same text, but the last line and the subject are very
different in each.
SA handles th
stop forwarding your spam to lists! cut it to the bare essentials.
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
\ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
spamtraps: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the
Hi List.
I have 2 messages, where the bodies are the same.
1 scored 3.5, the other 6.3
Why is this? Way to may MEDS are coming through.
TAGGED MESSAGE HEADER:
Received: from jp-mx-1.mtnns.net ([209.212.97.2]) by protea.int.citec.net
with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Versio
