RE: inconsistant spam tagging

2006-01-27 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 7.1 [SPAM detected True ; 9.2 / 5.0] Report For Traders ... > spamfilter_string_action=data:,require ["fileinto"]; fileinto > "SPAM";["addheader "];addtag "[SPAM detected $U]";addheader > "X-Spam-Level: $U"; An uneducated guess... Perhaps there's another addtag later on

Re: inconsistant spam tagging

2006-01-27 Thread Jim Maul
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0

inconsistant spam tagging

2006-01-27 Thread spacegoose
dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online Pharm

inconsistant spam tagging

2006-01-27 Thread spacegoose
dear spamassassin list, this question regards using SA via sun's JES which has a spamassassin library, but any ideas from this list would be appreciated: here's how spam looks in my spam folder from sun's uwc (imap/http webmail client): [SPAM detected True ; 25.0 / 5.0] The Ultimate Online Pharm