Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-24 Thread Dan Schaefer
LuKreme wrote: On 21-Aug-2009, at 07:45, Dan Schaefer wrote: Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them. My required_score is 7. Then you have absolutely no cause for complaint. When the score

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-22 Thread LuKreme
On 21-Aug-2009, at 07:45, Dan Schaefer wrote: Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them. My required_score is 7. Then you have absolutely no cause for complaint. -- I have as much authority as

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 09:16:53 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: >>> Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the >>> subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. >>> http://pastebin.com/m561b461b >> >> freemail plugin http://sa.hege.li/ >> > It looks as if the F

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 17:29 -0500, McDonald, Dan wrote: > On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 00:24 +0200, mouss wrote: > > at a time where we search for complex obfuscations, you think we are > > silly to use rules that only match 1 space? > > besides, unless you use a rawbody rule, the text regularization wou

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread McDonald, Dan
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 00:24 +0200, mouss wrote: > Dan Schaefer a écrit : > > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: > >> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:06 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: > >> > > That is incorrect. I put double spaces in the subject, because I knew > > someone would bring that up. :-) > > > > at a t

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread mouss
Dan Schaefer a écrit : > Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:06 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: >> >>> Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? >>> >> >> Probably not a smart idea, since you insist on re-using that very >> subject for your list po

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread John Hardin
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009, Dan Schaefer wrote: Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. http://pastebin.com/m561b461b I haven't run it through my testbed yet, but... sought_fraud and the SARE fraud rulesets

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Dan Schaefer
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote: On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:06 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? Probably not a smart idea, since you insist on re-using that very subject for your list post... That is incorrect. I put double s

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:06 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: > Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? Probably not a smart idea, since you insist on re-using that very subject for your list post... -- char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\x

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Karsten Bräckelmann
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 09:45 -0400, Dan Schaefer wrote: > > Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but > > it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them. > > My required_score is 7. That's pretty much your local problem, then... Most scores are n

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Dan Schaefer
Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but it would have scored 5.0 and been marked as spam even without them. My required_score is 7. -- Dan Schaefer Web Developer/Systems Analyst Performance Administration Corp.

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Bowie Bailey
Dan Schaefer wrote: > Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I > have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. > http://pastebin.com/m561b461b Scored pretty high here. DCC and JMF-BLACK account for quite a bit, but it would have scored 5.0 and been ma

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Ned Slider
Dan Schaefer wrote: Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. http://pastebin.com/m561b461b Similar here, except I get a few hits on extra RBLs, although who knows if those would have hit at the time o

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Dan Schaefer
Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. http://pastebin.com/m561b461b freemail plugin http://sa.hege.li/ It looks as if the FREEMAIL_BODY is the only rule that works with this email. The From addres

Re: i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Fri 21 Aug 2009 02:06:22 PM CEST, Dan Schaefer wrote Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. http://pastebin.com/m561b461b freemail plugin http://sa.hege.li/ -- xpoint

i need your indulgence

2009-08-21 Thread Dan Schaefer
Any ideas about this one, besides adding a score to match the subject? I have 4 in my inbox this morning with scores no more than 5. http://pastebin.com/m561b461b -- Dan Schaefer Web Developer/Systems Analyst Performance Administration Corp.