Tammy George wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> Few questions - will running 'check_whitelist' affect our server's
> performance?
It really shouldn't. It's a pretty lightweight tool, and will only
remove "one off" entries by default.
If you're concerned, you can also execute it through the "
Thanks for the responses.
Few questions - will running 'check_whitelist' affect our server's
performance? Do I risk creating other problems if I leave things as they
are until our sys admin returns? :)
On 7/18/07, Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tammy George wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Ou
Tammy George wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Our Linux server is running SpamAssassin version 3.1.5.
>
> Backups started dying with 'inactivity timeout'. Dug around & found
> the following:
>
> drwx-- 3 vscan vscan512 Jul 18 16:28 .
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:30:25PM -0300, Tammy George wrote:
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18 16:28 auto-whitelist
> A du -k shows auto-whitelist as being 1747968.
Ah, the magic of sparse files. :)
> After I send this email, I'm going to look into check_whitelist and
> trim_wh
Hello.
Our Linux server is running SpamAssassin version 3.1.5.
Backups started dying with 'inactivity timeout'. Dug around & found the
following:
drwx-- 3 vscan vscan512 Jul 18 16:28 .
-rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18 16:28 auto-whitelist
-rw--- 1 vsca
