Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-24 Thread Jan P. Kessler
mouss schrieb: Micah Anderson a écrit : "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be white

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Micah Anderson wrote on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:04:44 -0500: > Where is this postfwd config you refer to? I found it yesterday easily by just googling for, uh, "postfwd". Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-20 Thread mouss
Micah Anderson a écrit : > "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: >> >> postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal >> dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be >> whitelisted ha

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-20 Thread Micah Anderson
"Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: > > postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal > dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be > whitelisted hard in postfwd and in spamassassin,

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-18 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote: > The problem is catching smallish local ISP type relays. If such users send > lots of ham inside Finland and only the occasional spam/virus leak to some > US honeypot, it's no surprise your list can't be foolproof. I guess I have > to build my own

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:16:27PM +0200, Henrik K wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:34:36PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: > > > > If we had a 30% FP rate we would be out of business. I think that's an > > exaggeration. > > What do you call 294 hams out of 836 JMF hits then? To be fair, I do have

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-18 Thread Henrik K
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:34:36PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: > > If we had a 30% FP rate we would be out of business. I think that's an > exaggeration. What do you call 294 hams out of 836 JMF hits then? Don't take it personally, even barracuda has similar ratio. I can't add many points with it

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-18 Thread Marc Perkel
Henrik K wrote: On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got

Re: hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-16 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote: > > Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up > hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However > it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got > this configur

hostkarma junkemailfilter

2008-11-16 Thread Micah Anderson
Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got this configured backwards, or this isn't working very well because it whitelists too mu