mouss schrieb:
Micah Anderson a écrit :
"Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote:
postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal
dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be
white
Micah Anderson wrote on Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:04:44 -0500:
> Where is this postfwd config you refer to?
I found it yesterday easily by just googling for, uh, "postfwd".
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
Micah Anderson a écrit :
> "Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote:
>>
>> postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal
>> dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be
>> whitelisted ha
"Benny Pedersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote:
>
> postfwd and trusted_networks msa_networks is what i do use here, then minimal
> dns lookups is needed olso, facebook have random helo so need to be
> whitelisted hard in postfwd and in spamassassin,
On Tue, November 18, 2008 22:16, Henrik K wrote:
> The problem is catching smallish local ISP type relays. If such users send
> lots of ham inside Finland and only the occasional spam/virus leak to some
> US honeypot, it's no surprise your list can't be foolproof. I guess I have
> to build my own
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:16:27PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:34:36PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >
> > If we had a 30% FP rate we would be out of business. I think that's an
> > exaggeration.
>
> What do you call 294 hams out of 836 JMF hits then?
To be fair, I do have
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:34:36PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
> If we had a 30% FP rate we would be out of business. I think that's an
> exaggeration.
What do you call 294 hams out of 836 JMF hits then?
Don't take it personally, even barracuda has similar ratio. I can't add many
points with it
Henrik K wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up
hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However
it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 03:29:07PM -0500, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
> Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up
> hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However
> it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got
> this configur
Over at another post about Phishing[0], Brent suggested setting up
hostkarma.junkemailfilter to my RBL list, which I have done... However
it seems to hit a lot of spams giving them a -5 scoring. I've either got
this configured backwards, or this isn't working very well because it
whitelists too mu
10 matches
Mail list logo