b.gpg
I've read that the ownership should be root,
Would reading that advice again help you follow it? :)
Make the owner root.
so does having the owner =
spamd, and the group = root, causing that warning?
I'm betting yes, although I have not tested it. The definitive answer
would come
I have a cron job running as root, which calls sa-update
it warns about unsafe ownership
gpg: WARNING: unsafe ownership on homedir
`/var/lib/spamassassin/sa-update-keys'
this is my current o
On 29.06.24 17:07, Rick Gutierrez wrote:
hi list , The latest version of spamassassin on Ubuntu 22.04 does not
exist or they did not create the deb package, someone on the list who
has the deb package and wants to share it.
https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=spamassassin
perhaps you
hi list , The latest version of spamassassin on Ubuntu 22.04 does not
exist or they did not create the deb package, someone on the list who
has the deb package and wants to share it.
thnk for any help.
--
rickygm
http://gnuforever.homelinux.com
Read the document. Upgraded. Ran sa-update (always forget that)
We really have a very simple setup, except for our homegrown integration wiith
our email system. So I added
enable_compat welcomelist_blocklist" to init.pre
Then did a search/replace of local.cf for all whitelist_from and
blackli
Anders Gustafsson skrev den 2024-06-16 13:42:
This one:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
On 16.06.24 14:42, Anders Gustafsson wrote:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
TO_EQ_FM
This one:
Return-path:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5 (2021-03-20) on xx
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-95.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5,RDNS_NONE,
TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX,TO_NO_BRKTS_NORDNS_HTML
, March 20, 2024 10:02 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Help with rule matching when it shouldn't
I want to catch “yahoo” anywhere in the header so that it matches if its in the
name or in the address. So I would want to match
ya...@gmail.com<mailto:ya...@gmail.com>
eturn path does
not include yahoo.com, match my rule.
From: Jimmy
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 7:45 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with rule matching when it shouldn't
The correct syntax for the header rule should be:
header __FROM_ADDRESS From:addr =~ /\@yahoo\.c
o we can adjust the rules accordingly.
Note that Return-Path may not exist at the time spam is filtered as it is
often added when mail is delivered to mailbox.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:52 AM Erickarlo Porro wrote:
Could someone help me figure out why my custom rule is matching when it
should not b
ETURNPATH_IS" rule should indeed be
triggered since it matches "yahoo.com" in the return-path. If you're
uncertain about the intended behavior of the rules, please clarify the
requirements so we can adjust the rules accordingly.
Jimmy
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:52 AM Erickarlo Porr
Could someone help me figure out why my custom rule is matching when it should
not be matching?
This is my current setup:
header __FROM_ADDRESS From =~ /yahoo/i
header __RETURNPATH_IS Return-Path !~ /yahoo.com$/i
meta NOT_IT (__FROM_ADDRESS && __RETURNPATH_IS)
describe
On 2023-09-12 at 12:44:31 UTC-0400 (Tue, 12 Sep 2023 18:44:31 +0200)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
On 11.09.23 10:35, D Benham wrote:
Ok, I need some guidance. I am getting a lot of this:
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The
query to URIBL was blocked.
On 11.09.23 10:35, D Benham wrote:
Ok, I need some guidance. I am getting a lot of this:
0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to
URIBL was blocked.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
les do I
need to provide to help? I'm just not sure where to go from here.
have you also read the link(s) above?
SA explains the problem and how to avoid it, namely points to:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPAMASSASSIN/CachingNameserver
Unfortunately, the current page doe
the requests are... being forwarded to a public DNS
server? I assume that, at some point, that has to happen...? What am
I missing? What do I need to do/change? What log files do I need to
provide to help? I'm just not sure where to go from here.
have you also read the link(s) above?
SA e
hat has to happen...? What am I missing?
> What do I need to do/change? What log files do I need to provide to
> help? I'm just not sure where to go from here.
>
>
> D
>
the requests are... being forwarded to a public DNS
server? I assume that, at some point, that has to happen...? What am
I missing? What do I need to do/change? What log files do I need to
provide to help? I'm just not sure where to go from here.
D
I had this issue as well and i
o a public DNS server? I
assume that, at some point, that has to happen...? What am I missing?
What do I need to do/change? What log files do I need to provide to
help? I'm just not sure where to go from here.
D
On Mon, 5 Jun 2023, jacklistm...@gmail.com wrote:
header FROM_CLIENT_IP Received =~ /from 138\.31\230\.222/
Missing a period in that one.
meta FROM_CLIENT_TEST from FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL && FROM_CLIENT_IP
Extra "from" already noted.
If you're looking to whitelist specific senders coming from
On 2023-06-06 at 01:32:14 UTC-0400 (Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:32:14 +0300)
Henrik K via users
is rumored to have said:
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:12:10AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
Escape the @ with a \
SA uses Perl, so you need to escape %, @, and $ in regular
expressions.
Perl regular expressions
On 05.06.23 22:04, jacklistm...@gmail.com wrote:
I know this isn't the best method, I have to learn some of the previous
suggestions, but I would like to get this rule to work.
Not sure where I went wrong.
header FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL From =~ /client@client\.com/i
I recommend to use From:addr, so
@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Help with rule
> meta FROM_CLIENT_TEST from FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL && FROM_CLIENT_IP
Is that a typo when you were making this mail, or is it actually how the
line is coded? There is an extra "from" there.
Even if you fix that, you won't get th
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:12:10AM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
>
> Escape the @ with a \
> SA uses Perl, so you need to escape %, @, and $ in regular expressions.
Perl regular expressions does not mean it's parsed as Perl code, no need to
quote such things on any remotely modern SA version.
On 2023-06-05 at 22:04:47 UTC-0400 (Mon, 5 Jun 2023 22:04:47 -0400)
is rumored to have said:
Hello All,
I know this isn't the best method, I have to learn some of the
previous
suggestions, but I would like to get this rule to work.
Not sure where I went wrong.
header FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL
> meta FROM_CLIENT_TEST from FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL && FROM_CLIENT_IP
Is that a typo when you were making this mail, or is it actually how the line
is coded? There is an extra "from" there.
Even if you fix that, you won't get the results you expect. Both
FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL and FROM_CLIENT_IP will sc
Hello All,
I know this isn't the best method, I have to learn some of the previous
suggestions, but I would like to get this rule to work.
Not sure where I went wrong.
header FROM_CLIENT_EMAIL From =~ /client@client\.com/i
header FROM_CLIENT_IP Received =~ /from 138\.31\230\.222/
meta FR
> header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(test\.com|test\.net)$/
That for efficiency really should use a non-capturing grouping:
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(?:test\.com|test\.net)$/
Note the "?:" after the left parend.
Loren
David B Funk skrev den 2023-01-14 08:35:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2023-01-14 03:59:
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(test|junc)\.(com|net|eu)$/
describe TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN Mail sent to test.com or test.net email
addresses
score TO_SPECIFIC_D
On Sat, 14 Jan 2023, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2023-01-14 03:59:
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(test|junc)\.(com|net|eu)$/
describe TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN Mail sent to test.com or test.net email addresses
score TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN -0.5
tested works if i mail myself :=
Benny Pedersen skrev den 2023-01-14 03:59:
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(test|junc)\.(com|net|eu)$/
describe TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN Mail sent to test.com or test.net email
addresses
score TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN -0.5
tested works if i mail myself :=)
Joey J skrev den 2023-01-14 03:42:
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr =~ /\@(test\.com|test\.net)$/
describe TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN Mail sent to test.com or test.net email
addresses
score TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN -2.0
header TO_SPECIFIC_DOMAIN To:addr ~= /\@test\.(com|net)$/
should work
Thanks to everyone's suggestions.
I will try to respond to everyone in this 1 message:
This was intended for people who get both filtering inbound and outbound
form the mail gateway.
At times certain legit content gets flagged on the way OUT, so this was to
try and add a little negative score, so
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, John Hardin wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
get
added some negative value.
I also tried it with just domains so it wou
On Thu, 12 Jan 2023, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
get
added some negative value.
I also tried it with just domains so it would be more efficient, but I
can't seem to get th
2\.com |
> example3\.com)$'
>
>
> Loren
>
> - Original Message -
> From: [4]Joey J
> To: [5]users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 3:39 PM
> Subject: Rule Help - not sure what is wrong with my syntax
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 16:56 -0800, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Why not do a simple rule rather than inventing some Perl code?
>
> header TO_SPECIFIC_EMAIL To:addr ~=
> '(?:\bus...@example.com|\bus...@example.com|\bus...@example.com)'
> describe TO_SPECIFIC_EMAIL Mail to a specific email address
> score
On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 18:39 -0500, Joey J wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to
> get
> added some negative value.
> I also tried it with just domains so it would be more efficient, but I
> can't seem to get them to run.
> Any suggestions?
>
U
Original Message -
From: Joey J
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 3:39 PM
Subject: Rule Help - not sure what is wrong with my syntax
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to get added
some negative
Hello All,
I created this rule to check for email addresses matching a list to get
added some negative value.
I also tried it with just domains so it would be more efficient, but I
can't seem to get them to run.
Any suggestions?
header TO_SPECIFIC_EMAIL eval:check_to_specific_email()
describe TO_
On 2022-07-13 at 09:08:23 UTC-0400 (Wed, 13 Jul 2022 16:08:23 +0300)
Tomas Ukkonen
is rumored to have said:
Hello
I'm asking for help online when I'm being murdered!
Hyperbole is not your friend.
This list is NOT a general support forum. It is specifically for users
of the Apach
Hello
I'm asking for help online when I'm being murdered!
Police investigation showed there are people who want to murder me and hospital
gives me experimental toxic treatment without reason. I cannot survive this
treatment.
When I ask for help online using emails spam s
I'd prefer that information not be shared. It's not for public use.
On 7/30/2021 8:48 AM, RW wrote:
is KAMOnly.pm plugin needed ?, atleast its should be documented, i
have that plugin installed now, it makes huge diffrent,
How did you get it? Or is it just a dummy plugin?
--
Kevin A. McGrail
On 2021-07-30 14:48, RW wrote:
How did you get it? Or is it just a dummy plugin?
https://www.pccc.com/downloads/SpamAssassin/contrib/
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021 16:41:56 +0200
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-07-29 03:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > Are you running the KAM ruleset? There are some seo rules in
> > there.
>
> is KAMOnly.pm plugin needed ?, atleast its should be documented, i
> have that plugin installed now, it makes
have a copy , most will say thank
you, but dont share else, that sayed, you could share spamassassin -t
msg results to get more help on create local rules to catch it
So far so good. 16 messages marked as spam over the last 12hr and one
got through. Can I send the one that got through to somebody
anonymously?
On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 6:18 AM Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
> Lol and Thanks :-) The key thing you are seeing I would guess is our RBL.
> We took it out
Lol and Thanks :-) The key thing you are seeing I would guess is our RBL.
We took it out of the public rules because a big player added it to their
systems and we couldn't handle lookups from a few bazillion boxes. Linode
donated us two boxes so it's on the roadmap to open it back up to the
publi
On 2021-07-29 21:37, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
The KAMOnly plugin is not needed. It activates rules for our
infrastructure.
i like the infrastructure then
The KAMOnly plugin is not needed. It activates rules for our
infrastructure.
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 10:42 AM Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2021-07
On 2021-07-29 03:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
Are you running the KAM ruleset? There are some seo rules in there.
is KAMOnly.pm plugin needed ?, atleast its should be documented, i have
that plugin installed now, it makes huge diffrent, i am just asking,
hopefully i helps others
These emails are often also about translation help, or offering to
publish an article on your site.
I do run the KAM ruleset, but they do not hit on these. Happy to provide
some samples in some way that wouldn't get caught :D
On 2021-07-29 10:25:19, Robert S wrote:
> I am getting delu
body NOT_INTERESTED=~ /“[Nn]ot\S{1,5}[Ii]nterested\.?â€/
Might also be an interesting test. I assume the gibberish on the front and
back is quotes in some character set or another, but they seem a little
unlikely in a real mail.
Loren
---
This email has been checked for viruses
On Thu, 29 Jul 2021, Robert S wrote:
I am getting deluged with emails coming from semi-legitimate looking
sources offering to "improve" my website, which is hosted with the
same domain name as my email address (example below). Does anybody
have a rule that helps to increase the spam score of the
Il 18/05/2021 15:27, Henrik K ha scritto:
Instead of \x{00E0}, you need to use \xC3\xA0 as you are matching_separate_
raw bytes. (untested, but assuming so from the url, too busy to test)
Yes, it works. I was confusing, the Spamassassin documentation is right.
I really have to use non capturing
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 03:04:12PM +0200, Marco wrote:
>
> Hello Henrik,
>
> thank you for the hints. I didn't realized that SA doesn't support UTF8
> regex. Well. As you suggest, I would like to write rules coding independent
> in order to avoid surprises. I tried, it doesn't work...
>
> I hav
Il 17/05/2021 18:12, Henrik K ha scritto:
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:02:57PM +0200, Marco wrote:
So I have to add the accented character literally.
I can't understand why. Are there any limitation in Hashbl plugin with UTF8?
Maybe I have misunderstood something.
SA doesn't support UTF8 regex.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:12:47PM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
>
> Or check the replace_tags in 25_replace.cf, there's ready templates for
> characters (but they match some commonly obfuscated variants too).
And yeah sorry, these won't work with HashBL, it's just for basic rules..
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 03:02:57PM +0200, Marco wrote:
>
> So I have to add the accented character literally.
> I can't understand why. Are there any limitation in Hashbl plugin with UTF8?
> Maybe I have misunderstood something.
SA doesn't support UTF8 regex. It's just matching plain byte string
Hello,
I'm trying to use Hashbl plugin with bodyre function.
With that function I would like to match utf8 patterns, such as
'([\p{L}\p{M}\d\S]+[\ \t]+[\p{L}\p{M}\d\S]+)'
I'm in particular interested in accented characters, such as /[àèìòù]/.
With Perl, if I try:
```
use utf8;
use
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
All,
I'm noticing a pattern of email like:
From: "GUSHI.ORG Administrator"
To: y...@gushi.org
Subject: Your mailbox has exceeded its quota
Or some such nonsense.
Now, DMARC and SPF and DKIM would be ab
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
All,
I'm noticing a pattern of email like:
From: "GUSHI.ORG Administrator"
To: y...@gushi.org
Subject: Your mailbox has exceeded its quota
Or some such nonsense.
Now, DMARC and SPF and DKIM would be able to block the domain if they tried
to s
All,
I'm noticing a pattern of email like:
From: "GUSHI.ORG Administrator"
To: y...@gushi.org
Subject: Your mailbox has exceeded its quota
Or some such nonsense.
Now, DMARC and SPF and DKIM would be able to block the domain if they
tried to spoof it in the From email address. But mail clien
On 15.01.20 11:02, AJ Weber wrote:
I'm hoping this is a relatively simple test...
I'm seeing emails "From Me, To Me", typically extortion types. I'm not
even seeing which of the SA tests are getting hit, because I have my
own email in my Whitelist.
Is there a way I can check IF From = m...@s
On Wed, 2020-01-15 at 11:02 -0500, AJ Weber wrote:
> I'm hoping this is a relatively simple test...
> I'm seeing emails "From Me, To Me", typically extortion types. I'm not
> even seeing which of the SA tests are getting hit, because I have my
> own email in my Whitelist.
> Is there a way I can che
I'm hoping this is a relatively simple test...
I'm seeing emails "From Me, To Me", typically extortion types. I'm not
even seeing which of the SA tests are getting hit, because I have my own
email in my Whitelist.
Is there a way I can check IF From = m...@staticinfo.com AND Return-Path
!= FR
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:40:27 -0800
Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple
> and some multi-condition rules but need something custom.
>
> My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the
> 90s so… I have some sites where
On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 12:40:27 -0800
Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple
> and some multi-condition rules but need something custom.
>
> My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the
> 90s so… I have some sites whe
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 14:22 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> Actually, I want it to score if there ISN’T a match. If I get an email
> addressed to slashdot@example.com from an address that isn’t from
> slashdot, it’s likely spam.
>
> Currently, I am doing like you mentioned with a bunch of indivi
From: Martin Gregorie
Reply: mar...@gregorie.org
Date: December 4, 2019 at 4:12:22 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Custom rule help
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:40 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> I want a rule that scores if “sitename” is not in the From: line. If
> the
On Wed, 2019-12-04 at 12:40 -0800, Chris Mulcahy wrote:
> I want a rule that scores if “sitename” is not in the From: line. If
> they send from i...@sitename.com, I’ll assume it’s legit. If sitename
> does not exist, I’ll tick up the score a bit. I have done this for
> some specific domains but th
Hi.
I’m relatively new to complex custom rules. I have plenty of simple and
some multi-condition rules but need something custom.
My approach to using my domain name is bad but I started it in the 90s so…
I have some sites where I gave them my email address as “
sitename@mydomain.com” so I
e I missed? Thanks for any enlightenment, RTFM.
This may help to figure it out in debug mode:
uri_detail __ALL_URI_DTL_TXT text =~ /.*/
tflags __ALL_URI_DTL_TXTmultiple
You *should* be able to see exactly what is there - the HTML token or a
UTF-8 byte sequence.
--
John Har
On Jun 4, 2019, at 4:05 PM, RW wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:06:10 -0300 Marcio Vogel Merlone dos Santos wrote:
>
>> Trying to match a message using uri_detail with no luck. On body I
>> have something like this:
>>
>> Something →
> &rarr represents a '→' (right arrow) character, IIWY I'd t
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 16:06:10 -0300
Marcio Vogel Merlone dos Santos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to match a message using uri_detail with no luck. On body I
> have something like this:
>
> Something →
>
> That "something" is changed on a daily basis, so I am trying to match
> the → which is commo
Hi all,
Trying to match a message using uri_detail with no luck. On body I have
something like this:
Something →
That "something" is changed on a daily basis, so I am trying to match
the → which is common to all variations, and failing miserably. I
have tried the obvious and some (desperate
On 12/23/2018 6:52 AM, spamassassin_fo...@dwd.hu wrote:
> Hi,
> I want to filter all mails incoming to info@*ANY_DOMAIN*.hu except to
> i...@asdf.hu
> I have a lot of domains and spamming to info@ is legal in Hungary. :S
> Thank you!
If you are just looking for a regex, this should do it:
/\binfo
On Sun, 23 Dec 2018, spamassassin_fo...@dwd.hu wrote:
I want to filter all mails incoming to info@*ANY_DOMAIN*.hu except to
i...@asdf.hu
I have a lot of domains and spamming to info@ is legal in Hungary. :S
Thank you!
Filtering like that is much better done in the MTA before the message
conte
On 23.12.18 12:52, spamassassin_fo...@dwd.hu wrote:
I want to filter all mails incoming to info@*ANY_DOMAIN*.hu except to
i...@asdf.hu
I believe simple directives "whitelist_to", "more_spam_to" and "all_spam_to"
I have a lot of domains and spamming to info@ is legal in Hungary. :S
is blocki
Hi,
I want to filter all mails incoming to info@*ANY_DOMAIN*.hu except to
i...@asdf.hu
I have a lot of domains and spamming to info@ is legal in Hungary. :S
Thank you!
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:12:11 +0200
Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> I have an DKIM/SPF secured email domain, but somehow my experience
> with it has been perfect.
>
> SpamAssassin (and other Internet participants see the mail as
> DKIM_INVALID if I send the mail from my Laptop to my sender. The
> sender
> Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti 10.11.2018 kello 20.03:
>
>
>
>> Jari Fredriksson mailto:ja...@iki.fi>> kirjoitti 10.11.2018
>> kello 17.12:
>>
>> I have an DKIM/SPF secured email domain, but somehow my experience with it
>> has been perfect.
>>
>> SpamAssassin (and other Internet participan
> Jari Fredriksson kirjoitti 10.11.2018 kello 17.12:
>
> I have an DKIM/SPF secured email domain, but somehow my experience with it
> has been perfect.
>
> SpamAssassin (and other Internet participants see the mail as DKIM_INVALID if
> I send the mail from my Laptop to my sender. The sender
Jari Fredriksson skrev den 2018-11-10 16:12:
I have an DKIM/SPF secured email domain, but somehow my experience
with it has been perfect.
oh well
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none)
header.from=iki.fi
Authentication-Results: linode.junc.eu; dkim=none; dkim-at
I have an DKIM/SPF secured email domain, but somehow my experience with it has
been perfect.
SpamAssassin (and other Internet participants see the mail as DKIM_INVALID if I
send the mail from my Laptop to my sender. The sender seems to be my laptop and
my server could be forged.
PasteBin: http
Daniel J. Luke wrote on 11/09/18 5:58 AM:
I use this (with a perl I built myself outside of macports) and I can confirm
it works.
Cool. Also, FYI, I did a quick test for the DB_File problem in the latest beta
of Mac OS Mojave with the system perl and it did not have this bug. I haven't
had
On Sep 8, 2018, at 8:48 PM, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Macports install of db48 should work for that, but I haven't tried it.
I use this (with a perl I built myself outside of macports) and I can confirm
it works.
--
Daniel J. Luke
This is really old, but it was never answered satisfactorily and it is what
shows up in a Google search for the problem. I'm posting this solution to make
sure it shows up in future searches.
Here is the solution I just found and added to the Apache SpamAssassin wiki
https://wiki.apache.org/sp
On 23 Jul 2018, at 23:40, Pedro David Marco wrote:
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 12:07:52 AM GMT+2, David B Funk
wrote:
What kind of 'calculations with that IP' ?
Thanks Dave... calculations are complex and done with a an external
script that reads some files parsing them...
Depending o
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 12:07:52 AM GMT+2, David B Funk
wrote:
>What kind of 'calculations with that IP' ?
On 24.07.18 06:40, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Thanks Dave... calculations are complex and done with a an external script that
reads some files parsing them...
"calculations are co
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 12:07:52 AM GMT+2, David B Funk
wrote:
>What kind of 'calculations with that IP' ?
Thanks Dave... calculations are complex and done with a an external script that
reads some files parsing them...
-PedroD
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, 12:04:57 AM GMT+2, Kris Deugau
wrote:
>IIRC PowerDNS can be set up to run Lua code fragments of some kind on DNS
>requests.
Thanks! i did not know it. i have checked it and Lus cannot exec
eternanl commands to get a possible "answer"...
> To my
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Pedro David Marco wrote:
Not exactly a SA question but...
i am planning to run my own RBL with a nameserver, that when queried for an IP
that is not in its database, does some calculations with that IP and replies
accordingly (caching the results)...
Please, does anyone k
Pedro David Marco wrote:
Not exactly a SA question but...
i am planning to run my own RBL with a nameserver, that when queried for
an IP that is not in its database, does some calculations with that IP
and replies accordingly (caching the results)...
Please, does anyone know of any nameserve
* Pedro David Marco :
> Not exactly a SA question but...
> i am planning to run my own RBL with a nameserver, that when queried for an
> IP that is not in its database, does some calculations with that IP and
> replies accordingly (caching the results)...
> Please, does anyone know of any nameser
Not exactly a SA question but...
i am planning to run my own RBL with a nameserver, that when queried for an IP
that is not in its database, does some calculations with that IP and replies
accordingly (caching the results)...
Please, does anyone know of any nameserver that can do that? To my know
Julian Kippels wrote:
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up a bayes-sql-database but I am unsure
of wether I want to set the bayes_sql_override_username option.
I would like to have per-user-bayes scores, so that scores from user A
will not interfere with messages sent to user B.
If I understand
Hi,
I am in the process of setting up a bayes-sql-database but I am unsure
of wether I want to set the bayes_sql_override_username option.
I would like to have per-user-bayes scores, so that scores from user A
will not interfere with messages sent to user B.
If I understand it correctly, no matter
is there anyone from Greece in the list, please?
i need some help about some greek emails..
Thanks..
--PedroD
1 - 100 of 1995 matches
Mail list logo
