Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread David Gibbs
mouss wrote: uri GOOGLE_SEARCH_BTNIm{gooo?gle\..*/search.*btnI=} Loose the last equals sign, I've seen similar samples come through without it. david

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread John D. Hardin
don't know how to do that, that's another topic - "how do I add custom rules?" - that has nothing do do with Google spams per se. > http://google.com//search?hl=en&q=inurl:rhtawy.com%2BVPXL%2BMade%2BEasy&btnI=79547 Yeah, that's what we've posted rules for. --

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread mouss
JP Kelly wrote: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: She'll Beg for More.. Date: January 21, 2008 10:34:15 AM PST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssas

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread JP Kelly
On Jan 21, 2008, at 9:26 AM, mouss wrote: JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the su

Re: google spams

2008-01-21 Thread mouss
JP Kelly wrote: Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rul

google spams

2008-01-21 Thread JP Kelly
Enough is enough! SA has been working so well for me all these years I guess I am spoiled. I woke up this morning and had 5 Google spams and one legit email and I've had it. I noticed a somewhat lengthy discussion on the subject here. I am not able to write my own rules or regex. Is th