On 1/23/2011 1:16 PM, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you Martin!
>
> I just added lenny-backports to update to 3.3.1 from old 3.2.x.
> NOW I do also get this spam HIGH scored :-)
>
> Inhaltsanalyse im Detail: (9.6 Punkte, 5.0 benötigt)
>
> Pkte Regelname Beschreibung
>
On 1/23/2011 3:03 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 10:35 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
>>
>>> SA-Report when passing them directly to SA can be found here:
>>> http://www.ghds.de/spam/sa-report.txt
>> Upgrading to 3.3.1 will certainly
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:16:09 +0100
"Starckjohann, Ove" wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you Martin!
>
> I just added lenny-backports to update to 3.3.1 from old 3.2.x.
> NOW I do also get this spam HIGH scored :-)
I don't think you have actually improved anything, most of the points
come from tests wi
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 10:35 -0800, John Hardin wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
>
> > SA-Report when passing them directly to SA can be found here:
> > http://www.ghds.de/spam/sa-report.txt
>
> Upgrading to 3.3.1 will certainly help.
>
> I note that message hits BAYES_00 -
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
SA-Report when passing them directly to SA can be found here:
http://www.ghds.de/spam/sa-report.txt
Upgrading to 3.3.1 will certainly help.
I note that message hits BAYES_00 - it seems you've gotten some
mistraining in there somehow. You might wa
;html"-Element
Thy!
Ove
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Martin Gregorie [mailto:mar...@gregorie.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Januar 2011 18:32
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: how to get this type of spam scored?
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 17:56 +0100, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
> During t
cored.
SA-Report when passing them directly to SA can be found here:
http://www.ghds.de/spam/sa-report.txt
Ove
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: John Hardin [mailto:jhar...@impsec.org]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 23. Januar 2011 18:26
An: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Betreff: Re: how to get this ty
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 17:56 +0100, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
> During the last days we got many of these spammails.
>
> http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam1_eml.txt
> http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam2_eml.txt
> http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam3_eml.txt
I ran the first one through my setup (SA 3.1.1 with URIBLs e
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Starckjohann, Ove wrote:
Hi!
During the last days we got many of these spammails.
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam1_eml.txt
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam2_eml.txt
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam3_eml.txt
Training them to bayes doesn't show any effect...they still don't get
scored
Hi!
During the last days we got many of these spammails.
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam1_eml.txt
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam2_eml.txt
http://www.ghds.de/spam/spam3_eml.txt
Training them to bayes doesn't show any effect...they still don't get
scored :-(
Any help appreciated!
Ove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Jim Knuth wrote:
>> Heute (07.06.2006/20:56 Uhr) schrieb Screaming Eagle,
>>
>>> All,
>>> I am getting this type of spam:
>>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=8.0
>>> tests=BAYES_50,DRUGS_MUSCLE,
>>> FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
Jim Knuth wrote:
> Heute (07.06.2006/20:56 Uhr) schrieb Screaming Eagle,
>
> > All,
> > I am getting this type of spam:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=8.0
> > tests=BAYES_50,DRUGS_MUSCLE,
> > FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no
>
> > How can I look up the def
Heute (07.06.2006/20:56 Uhr) schrieb Screaming Eagle,
> All,
> I am getting this type of spam:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_50,DRUGS_MUSCLE,
> FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no
> How can I look up the definiton of DRUGS_MUSCLE and FORGE_RCVD
All,
I am getting this type of spam:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_50,DRUGS_MUSCLE,
FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no
How can I look up the definiton of DRUGS_MUSCLE and FORGE_RCVD_HELO?
Thanks.
14 matches
Mail list logo