On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:47:00 +
Cedric Knight wrote:
> On 25/03/16 00:55, Alex wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First, I'm wondering why parking.ru isn't among the freemail
> > domains?
>
> Probably because the FreeMail plugin is designed to detect the
> right-hand side of email addresses for provide
On 25/03/16 00:55, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First, I'm wondering why parking.ru isn't among the freemail domains?
Probably because the FreeMail plugin is designed to detect the
right-hand side of email addresses for providers like Gmail and AOL, and
parking.ru looks like a general-purpose web host.
Hi,
First, I'm wondering why parking.ru isn't among the freemail domains?
Perhaps it should be added?
Received: from mail05.parking.ru (mail05.parking.ru [195.128.120.25])
by mail02.example.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED82347D26
for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 17:42:50 -0400 (EDT)
I'm re
If I understand that thread correctly, that is for e-mail addresses in body
text?
I'm suggesting looking only at authenticated UID's in headers from specific
providers like Yahoo who are notorious for spam, but their MTA's also send a
significant amount of ham so we cannot DNSBL block them. Given
On 2011-01-02 13:59, Warren Togami Jr. wrote:
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
Search the list archives for emailbl
1) I am assuming that ID's you see in headers of mail from Y
On søn 02 jan 2011 13:59:22 CET, "Warren Togami Jr." wrote
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
emailbl was better coded for this purpose imho
freemail as is, is perfect as it is n
I've been thinking, perhaps we should consider making a "Freemail Realtime
BL" that lists not IP addresses, but rather ID's at the Freemail provider.
1) I am assuming that ID's you see in headers of mail from Yahoo is always
from an authenticated user?
2) Traps and user reports can quickly list a
On 30/12/10 19:15, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote:
> Lately, I notice we are getting a fair amount (10-12 per day per client)
> of spam coming from freemail users (FREEMAIL_FROM triggers). Usually the
> Subject is non-existent or empty, and the message is always just an URL
I see a fair amount matching t
Hi,
Lately, I notice we are getting a fair amount (10-12 per day per client)
of spam coming from freemail users (FREEMAIL_FROM triggers). Usually the
Subject is non-existent or empty, and the message is always just an URL
Is there a good rule for flagging these as possible spam? I understand
