OK, I have a 'honeypot' email address that is collecting spam.
the bayes mentioning local.cf settings (SA 3.3.1) are:
use_bayes 1
bayes_auto_learn 1
bayes_store_module Mail::SpamAssassin::BayesStore::SQL
bayes_sql_dsn DBI:mysql:bayes:localhost:3306
bayes_sql_username user
bayes_sql_password *pas
Logan Shaw wrote:
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Joe Zitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Our scanning program has the ability to archive all e-mail, both
inbound
and outbound, which we have been doing for months now. Given that your
outbound mail is almost certainly ham, the majority of it
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006, jdow wrote:
From: "Joe Zitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Our scanning program has the ability to archive all e-mail, both inbound
and outbound, which we have been doing for months now. Given that your
outbound mail is almost certainly ham, the majority of it's content is
going
Well, that was part of my reason for doing it. My bayes is seriously
skewed for the spam side, something like 4 to 1. The problem is I'm
getting about 90% spam coming in, so it's difficult enough finding
legitimate mail to feed it. I wasn't talking about feeding strictly
outbounds, but using the
| From: Joe Zitnik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Our scanning program has the ability to archive all e-mail,
| both inbound
| and outbound, which we have been doing for months now. Given
| that your
| outbound mail is almost certainly ham, the majority of it's content is
| going to be specific t
From: "Joe Zitnik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Our scanning program has the ability to archive all e-mail, both inbound
and outbound, which we have been doing for months now. Given that your
outbound mail is almost certainly ham, the majority of it's content is
going to be specific to our business sect
Our scanning program has the ability to archive all e-mail, both inbound
and outbound, which we have been doing for months now. Given that your
outbound mail is almost certainly ham, the majority of it's content is
going to be specific to our business sector, wouldn't feeding outbounds
through bay
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Robert Bartlett wrote:
> > >
> > > The problem is the original email is not attached, they just forward
> > > it to me. Is there a way to just feed the body of the message
> > > instead of the he
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:48 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Feeding Bayes Forwarded Emails
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Robert Bartl
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Robert Bartlett wrote:
> > > If someone forwards me email as a regular forward and not as an
> > > attachment, could I still feed it to bayes as the user who forwarded
> > > it to me and still be effective? Or will that cause
-Original Message-
From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:30 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Feeding Bayes Forwarded Emails
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> If someone forwards me email as a regular forward and not as an
> atta
Robert Bartlett wrote:
> If someone forwards me email as a regular forward and not as an
> attachment, could I still feed it to bayes as the user who forwarded
> it to me and still be effective? Or will that cause problems because
> the headers show as the person forwarding the email and not the
>
If someone forwards me email as a regular forward and not as an attachment,
could I still feed it to bayes as the user who forwarded it to me and still
be effective? Or will that cause problems because the headers show as the
person forwarding the email and not the original headers?
What I mean ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
jimsheffer wrote:
[snip]
|
| Next, I tried the following, but it didn't like it. Heres what I did, and
| the response I received:
|
| Root# sa-learn --spam -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --dir
| /var/CommuniGate/Accounts/spam.macnt/INBOX.mbox
|
|
Ryan (and others)-
Thanks- I've now read the manual on that part- I guess I missed it, been
reading so much :)
That did the trick!
I fed the machine spam, and it shows it when I run lint -D
BUT, I received over 200 spam messages into a new box that I had redirected
to a mailbox if they reached t
In an older episode (Thursday 19 May 2005 00:48), Ken Goods wrote:
> jimsheffer wrote:
> > Any idea what I need to do? (there are over 200 emails in each
> > account, but it lookes like it read only 1)
Jim, how about reading the sa-learn manpage?
man sa-learn
> IIRC there's a --mbox switch to te
RTM :) Just kidding... Use the --mbox switch when running sa-learn.
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.0.x/dist/doc/sa-learn.html
--mboxInput sources are in mbox format
--mbx Input sources are in mbx format
- Ryan Sorensen
jimsheffer wrot
jimsheffer wrote:
> Ok-
>
> Root# sa-learn --spam -C /etc/mail/spamassassin --showdots --dir
> /var/CommuniGate/Accounts/spam.macnt/INBOX.mbox
>
> Use of uninitialized value in quotemeta at
> ///Library/Perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 928.
> .
> Learned from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examin
Ok-
I've got bayes db's all working, lint runs with no errors.
Now I need to feed the beast spam/ham messages!
2 questions:
I've set up 2 email accounts- ham and spam.
I've connected to these accounts via imap, and took several hundred of each
and dragged them into these folders. Will this work
Matt Kettler wrote:
You can't train SA on most messages from Eudora's .mbx files. Speaking
as a user of eudora, eudora completely destroys many important parts of
a message when it stores it in the mbox, and it cannot be reconstructed.
And this was the main reason that after using Eudora for 8 ye
Thanks. Glad I havn't started feeding it yet. So what I need to do is
look at the attachments and then save then to a file then train on that.
correct? That makes sense. Maybe that is why my old SA instance got
kinda weird in the end.
Thanks
Matt Kettler wrote:
Well, first, if you aren't stripp
At 11:52 AM 3/14/2005, Andreas Rust wrote:
we are mostly using Eudora (Windows version) and it's saving "Junk" emails
(as junked by Eudora itself) into
an .mbx file.
You can't train SA on most messages from Eudora's .mbx files. Speaking as a
user of eudora, eudora completely destroys many impor
Hello,
we are mostly using Eudora (Windows version) and it's saving "Junk" emails
(as junked by Eudora itself) into
an .mbx file.
Eventhough the .mbx file looks like an ok-formatted mbox file, it carries:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 18 15:28:02 2005
Infront of the normal headers.
Such as:
From
At 11:22 AM 3/14/2005, ChupaCabra wrote:
I just noticed that some of my users are attaching multiple spams in one
email to my "spam" user for training. Aside from having to have 200
spam/ham mails and the possibiliy of the messages being too large, would
this have an effect on training?
Well, f
I just noticed that some of my users are attaching multiple spams in one
email to my "spam" user for training. Aside from having to have 200
spam/ham mails and the possibiliy of the messages being too large, would
this have an effect on training?
Thanks.
--
Michael H. Collins Admiral, Penguin
25 matches
Mail list logo
