> >> Yes, score=17.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
> >> DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> >> KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_HUGEIMGSRC=0.2,
> >> KAM_SHORT=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724,
> >> RCVD_IN_DNSW
On 8/9/2023 6:59 AM, Marc wrote:
Yes, score=17.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_HUGEIMGSRC=0.2,
KAM_SHORT=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724,
RC
On 8/9/2023 6:59 AM, Marc wrote:
Yes, score=17.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_HUGEIMGSRC=0.2,
KAM_SHORT=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724,
RC
>
> Yes, score=17.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
> DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
> KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_HUGEIMGSRC=0.2,
> KAM_SHORT=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724,
> RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.00
Yes, score=17.228 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1,
DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_FROM_URIBL_PCCC=9, KAM_HUGEIMGSRC=0.2,
KAM_SHORT=0.001, MIME_HTML_MOSTLY=0.1, MPART_ALT_DIFF=0.724,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_
Please send me a sample of whatever it is you are smoking!
--
b.
On 1-8-2016 11:23, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2016-08-01 11:07, bOnK wrote:
On 31-7-2016 22:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
dovecot.org working on there own problem with 3.3.1
Maybe you meant this as a follow-up on thread "dovecot runs
On 2016-08-01 11:07, bOnK wrote:
On 31-7-2016 22:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
dovecot.org working on there own problem with 3.3.1
Maybe you meant this as a follow-up on thread "dovecot runs on a pbl
fun aside, i have it much more fun with a raspberri pi as full-hd shell
terminal
listed ip ?"
On 31-7-2016 22:16, Benny Pedersen wrote:
dovecot.org working on there own problem with 3.3.1
Maybe you meant this as a follow-up on thread "dovecot runs on a pbl
listed ip ?" on the dovecot list?
wake up
;-)
--
b.
On 2016-07-31 13:27, Benny Pedersen wrote:
# rule:[h.reindl maillist]
if allof (header :contains "from" "h.rei...@thelounge.net", header
:contains "to" "users@spamassassin.apache.org")
{
setflag "\\Seen";
stop;
}
That seems poorly written as it relies upon the To field while the list
On 2016-07-31 22:23, Reindl Harald wrote:
what the hell is the reason to spam this list with a report of a FP
solved years ago *before* update your stuff? especially from the guy
who talks always about "precompiled problems" outside of the gentoo
world and hence can't have any outdated software
Am 31.07.2016 um 22:16 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 2016-07-31 21:42, Martin Hepworth wrote:
3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as
latest is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets
But i'd really suggest you update
i have :=)
well, *now* you have, yo
On 2016-07-31 21:42, Martin Hepworth wrote:
3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as
latest is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets
But i'd really suggest you update
i have :=)
dovecot.org working on there own problem with 3.3.1
wake up
3.3.1 was released march 2010, yes its a slow update these days as latest
is 3.4.1 but most of the updates are around the rulesets
But i'd really suggest you update
On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 at 20:33, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On 2016-07-31 21:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > will you answer or ar
Am 31.07.2016 um 21:30 schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
so why do you complain in spamassassin list?
On 31.07.16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
is this a question ?
of course it is a question. it ends by a question mark.
read my post on do
On 2016-07-31 21:30, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
will you answer or are you just trolling?
oh dear
you may make your own problems
On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
so why do you complain in spamassassin list?
On 31.07.16 21:13, Benny Pedersen wrote:
is this a question ?
of course it is a question. it ends by a question mark.
read my post on dovecot running a server in pbl
why?
yes why ?
will yo
On 2016-07-31 21:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
so why do you complain in spamassassin list?
is this a question ?
read my post on dovecot running a server in pbl
why?
yes why ?
On 2016-07-31 17:37, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 31.07.16 16:55, Benny Pedersen wrote:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor ?
replication
seems to be very 5 years) old rule. need sa-update apparently:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6637
rule exists
Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor?
On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
fix your setup, that rule don't exist
[root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA
/usr/share/spamassassin
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamas
On 2016-07-31 20:46, Reindl Harald wrote:
don't care
so please ignore me with a autoreader in sieve, if you just reply to
dont care mails you miss a lot of time to other nice things
Am 31.07.2016 um 20:43 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor?
fix your setup, that rule don't exist
[root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA
/usr/share/spamassass
On 2016-07-31 20:27, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor?
fix your setup, that rule don't exist
[root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA
/usr/share/spamassassin
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamass
Am 31.07.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Benny Pedersen:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor?
fix your setup, that rule don't exist
[root@mail-gw:~]$ sa-score.sh FS_REPLICA
/usr/share/spamassassin
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004001/updates_spamassassin_org
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local-*
On 31.07.16 16:55, Benny Pedersen wrote:
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor ?
replication
seems to be very 5 years) old rule. need sa-update apparently:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6637
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantoma
3.6 FS_REPLICA Subject says "replica"
missing ancor ?
replication
25 matches
Mail list logo
