Re: different Return-Path: and From:

2020-10-30 Thread RW
helo hostname as a secondary check. SPF_PASS has only a nominal score, with SPF whitelisting you are whitelisting the envelope address, so it doesn't matter hugely. > How does > spamassassin treat a different Return-Path and From in a message? There are some meta rules that involve a comparison.

Re: different Return-Path: and From:

2020-10-30 Thread BenoƮt Panizzon
Hi > I had a phishing mail skip my spf check. The spf check was done on > the Return-Path and not the From:. Is a default convention? How does > spamassassin treat a different Return-Path and From in a message? You have to distinguish the 'envelope' of the email, the ad

RE: different Return-Path: and From:

2020-10-30 Thread Marc Roos
> so you want your own messages blocked everywhere? I do not know yet. I can assume this different on something like a mailing list. It is irritating that the From has a credible name, in this case from a bank.

different Return-Path: and From:

2020-10-30 Thread Marc Roos
I had a phishing mail skip my spf check. The spf check was done on the Return-Path and not the From:. Is a default convention? How does spamassassin treat a different Return-Path and From in a message?