Bowie Bailey BUC.com> writes:
>
>
> martin wrote:
> > Bowie Bailey BUC.com> writes:
> They trained on similar email, but not quite the same. There must
> have been something that caused them to go in different directions.
> Maybe you installed some extra rules on one of them. Regardless, t
Bowie Bailey BUC.com> writes:
>
> > all rules seem the same, expected BAYES_50 vs BAYES_99. What will
> > the causing for this value so high at backup server. Also, i had set
> > internal_networks 192.168.2.0/24 at both spamassassin local.cf at
> > both server, will it reduce/increase the BAYES_
config is:
main mail server (said 192.168.2.5) got the email, the mail
will local delivery and forward a copy to backup server
(said 192.168.2.6). spamassassin log at main server shown:
spamassassin log at main server
clean message (3.2/6.0) for spamassassin:99 in 4.8 seconds
