Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 1:35:19 PM, you wrote:
It's also hitting BAYES_99, which means your global Bayes database
(since you're running as root) thinks for sure this is NOT spam.
You've got a problem with the emails you've been learning in the past.
MLB> Th
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 1:35:19 PM, you wrote:
>> It's also hitting BAYES_99, which means your global Bayes database
>> (since you're running as root) thinks for sure this is NOT spam.
>> You've got a problem with the emails you've been learning in the past.
MLB> This are bad ne
Robert Menschel wrote:
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:48:18 AM, you wrote:
MLB> I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
MLB> find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
MLB> the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get mor
Hello Matías,
Friday, February 11, 2005, 8:48:18 AM, you wrote:
MLB> I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
MLB> find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
MLB> the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get more surprised
MLB>
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 11:48 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
I copy the message a feed SA with it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
autolearn=no version=3.0.2
OK, here it
At 11:48 AM 2/11/2005, Matías López Bergero wrote:
I copy the message a feed SA with it
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_99,HTML_80_90,
HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_08,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE
autolearn=no version=3.0.2
OK, here it hit the rules that i
Hi,
I just got a spam message in my inbox without being flagged by SA, and I
find it very curios because it was a clear spam message. Wen I examine
the headers to see the score assigned by SA I get more surprised
Content analysis details: (0.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name
