On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 01:18:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, now that I look, even my ham - this mailing list in particular -
> follow that format - you sure it isn't normal?
100%. Something in your stream is screwing up your headers.
> Received: from [63.240.76.165] (HELO scc
or
; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 09:21:39 -0500
Theo Van Dinter wrote ..
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > debug: received-header: unknown format: from harmonypets.every1.net
> > ([222.47.73.116])by
> myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id
On Sat, Oct 30, 2004 at 12:53:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> debug: received-header: unknown format: from harmonypets.every1.net
> ([222.47.73.116])by myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id
> i9UBhAFh025756;Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:43:12 -0400
>
>
eader in the mail:
debug: received-header: unknown format: from harmonypets.every1.net
([222.47.73.116])by myhost.mydomain.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id
i9UBhAFh025756;Sat, 30 Oct 2004 07:43:12 -0400
I looked at the parse_received_headers code, and I can see some tests that I
thought this
