Thomas Bolioli wrote:
Anyone with ideas, they would be greatly appreciated but right now I
need to determine if it is SA that is having issues with the lookups
or are the accounts screwed up in some way. bind does not seem to be
throttled either so the volume of queries should not be the issue
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:52:29PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
/etc/procmail and it is fired off with a user .forward file "|IFS=' ' &&
exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #tpblists". Still looking into Net::DNS.
A few ideas. First, do DROPPRIVS=yes if you haven'
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:25:59PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
vanilla ones and customized ones. Yet, account x is the only one that
RBL lookups is working on. Is there anything in how SA deals with DNS
lookups that could cause this?
SA c
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 06:52:29PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> /etc/procmail and it is fired off with a user .forward file "|IFS=' ' &&
> exec /usr/bin/procmail || exit 75 #tpblists". Still looking into Net::DNS.
A few ideas. First, do DROPPRIVS=yes if you haven't already. Second, why are
yo
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:25:59PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
vanilla ones and customized ones. Yet, account x is the only one that
RBL lookups is working on. Is there anything in how SA deals with DNS
lookups that could cause this?
SA calls Net::DNS, which as
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:52:23PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
The RBL checks fired off from the command line (while a queryperf was
running against the DNS server...) but not when postfix passes the email
off through procmail as the same users ID. This is stumping me
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:52:23PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> The RBL checks fired off from the command line (while a queryperf was
> running against the DNS server...) but not when postfix passes the email
> off through procmail as the same users ID. This is stumping me. Any ideas?
/etc/pro
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:38:54PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> Definitely not disabled (rules or rbl checks). local mode What is that?
Local mode is the -L commandline parameter to spamassassn and spamd. It
disables all network rules.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"When cryptography is o
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 05:25:59PM -0500, Thomas Bolioli wrote:
> vanilla ones and customized ones. Yet, account x is the only one that
> RBL lookups is working on. Is there anything in how SA deals with DNS
> lookups that could cause this?
SA calls Net::DNS, which as far as I know just looks at
Thomas Bolioli wrote:
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:19:40PM -, Alexis Manning wrote:
If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
Or you've disabled rules, or disa
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:19:40PM -, Alexis Manning wrote:
If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
Or you've disabled rules, or disabled rbl checks, or you
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:19:40PM -, Alexis Manning wrote:
If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
Or you've disabled rules, or disabled rbl checks, or you
Alexis Manning wrote:
Thomas Bolioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right you are... Then I have another issue. My RBL checks are not firing
off...
If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 09:19:40PM -, Alexis Manning wrote:
> If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
> it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
Or you've disabled rules, or disabled rbl checks, or you're running in
local mode, or .
Thomas Bolioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right you are... Then I have another issue. My RBL checks are not firing
> off...
If you're not seeing *any* BLs ever firing in your SA-marked up mails then
it'd sound like a DNS issue, e.g. misconfigured firewall or router.
If you're seeing some interm
Alexis Manning wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to get lookups against cbl (http://cbl.abuseat.org/) and
it does not seem to be working.
Not a direct answer to your rules question, but isn't the CBL already
included in the XBL check?
-- A.
Right you are... Then I have an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to get lookups against cbl (http://cbl.abuseat.org/) and
> it does not seem to be working.
Not a direct answer to your rules question, but isn't the CBL already
included in the XBL check?
-- A.
I am trying to get lookups against cbl (http://cbl.abuseat.org/) and
it does not seem to be working. Below is what I am adding to the local
cf but it is not firing off. Also, I tried both check_rbl() and
check_rbl_txt(). What am I doing wrong here.
Thanks,
Tom
FYI: CBL is catching a lot of t
18 matches
Mail list logo
