Dale Carstensen wrote:
> Should this rule just be dropped from
> whatever distributes it to me automatically (spamassassin.org,
> and SARE from openprotect)?
Yes.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5632
>ram,
>
>> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:36 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
[ snip -- discussion of slow response from
combined-HIB.dnsiplists.completewhois.com ]
>
> Mark
It appears from my logs back as far as August 7, 2007, all I get is
SERVFAIL, certainly today there is no routing path to either
ram wrote:
>
>
> But I am seeing the DNS tests taking more than 10s on my servers from
> the spamassassin -D logs
>
> Even though I have in my prefs file
> rbl_timeout 5
>
rbl_timeout is an administrator setting. You can't set in user_prefs.
It's got to be a local.cf thing.
(This protects th
ram,
> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:36 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > No, because all the DNS tests are run together as a batch.
> > (this way the lookups run in parallel)
> > Besides, if completewhois is the only "slow" RBL, the timeout for it is
> > going to effectively be 4 seconds anyway. (ie: if
On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 08:36 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> ram wrote:
> > On my SA 3.2.3 servers , I want to timeout all the *.completewhois.com
> > DNS lookups after 5s
> >
> >
> > I have seen the mailqs shoot up just because of these lookups
> >
>
> No, because all the DNS tests are run toget
ram wrote:
> On my SA 3.2.3 servers , I want to timeout all the *.completewhois.com
> DNS lookups after 5s
>
>
> I have seen the mailqs shoot up just because of these lookups
>
No, because all the DNS tests are run together as a batch. (this way the
lookups run in parallel)
Besides, if compl
On my SA 3.2.3 servers , I want to timeout all the *.completewhois.com
DNS lookups after 5s
I have seen the mailqs shoot up just because of these lookups
Thanks
Ram
