Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Charlie Clark
of 4 t1's Grr the whole thing is frustrating The guy's a moron but I think his disclaimer lets him off: "The BlarsBL is maintained by Blars at his wim. Use for any purpouse should be done at your own risk, and Blars is not responsible for use by anyone but himself." Whil

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Spamassassin List
This is the guy's www site http://www.blars.org/errors/block.html I had some trouble with his list before too. Not many people is using that list, so i guess, not much of damage done anyway.

RE: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Lindell
strating Tom -Original Message- From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:37 AM To: spamassassin Subject: Re: blarsbl Thomas Lindell wrote: > Has anyone had any dealings with this guy. > > I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming v

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread twofers
had any dealings with this guy. I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very seriously in general. Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet until the problem is resolved The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my company 150

blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Lindell
Has anyone had any dealings with this guy. I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take spamming very seriously in general. Even when I detect one of my customers sending spam I disable there internet until the problem is resolved The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Kelson
Michael W Cocke wrote: He is. My system is on his list too, which is pretty amazing when you consider that my mail server supports 3, count them, 3 users - myself, my wife, and my 10 year old son - and he's somehow determined that my site hosts spammers. Last I looked, he listed all of Sprint.

RE: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Thomas Lindell
nto the fact that they where using blars in the first place. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of snowcrash+spamassassin Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:58 AM To: Thomas Lindell Cc: spamassassin Subject: Re: blarsbl On 11/21/06, Thom

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread hamann . w
pam I disable there internet >> until the problem is resolved >> >> The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my company 1500$ to >> remove our mail server from his list. >> >> When it was listed there for no good reason. >> >> I checked my

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Michael W Cocke
e problem is resolved > >The guy that runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my company 1500$ to >remove our mail server from his list. > >When it was listed there for no good reason. > >I checked my mail logs going back 6 months there wasn't a single email sent >nor rec

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread snowcrash+spamassassin
On 11/21/06, Thomas Lindell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At&t mail servers use his service. can you please share/point-to some evidence of that fact? if that *is* the case, i'll be chatting with my reps at at&t! if i've missed it here, i apologize in advance ... thanks.

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Marc Perkel
runs the blarsbl list wants to charge my company 1500$ to remove our mail server from his list. When it was listed there for no good reason. I checked my mail logs going back 6 months there wasn't a single email sent nor received from this guys domain and or ip block. It would seem to me

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread snowcrash+spamassassin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host gateway.mchsi.com[204.127.203.150] said: 550-12.175.23.161 blocked by ldap:ou=rblmx,dc=mso,dc=att,dc=net 550 Blocked for abuse. Please contact the administrator of your ISP or sending mailservice. (in reply to MAIL FROM command) aha. the mchsi-variant of

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread DAve
blarsbl list wants to charge my company 1500$ to remove our mail server from his list. When it was listed there for no good reason. I checked my mail logs going back 6 months there wasn't a single email sent nor received from this guys domain and or ip block. It would seem to me he's nothing

Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread DAve
the whole thing is frustrating Tom -Original Message- From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 10:37 AM To: spamassassin Subject: Re: blarsbl Thomas Lindell wrote: Has anyone had any dealings with this guy. I take my mail server very seriously. Further I take

Re: ****Re: blarsbl

2006-11-21 Thread Craig White
t; > > > What's odd is that my company uses at&t backhaul bandwidth in the form of 4 > > t1's > > > > Grr the whole thing is frustrating > > > > Tom > > > > -Original Message- > > From: DAve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] &g