On Thu, 13 Dec 2012, motty cruz wrote:
Thank you very much John,
I tried this
chown -R vscan:vscan /var/spool/amavis/.spamassassin
and now bayes score are showing up in the headers. Also, i tried the right
sa- database.
Thanks a bunch.
Happy to help!
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ
Thank you very much John,
I tried this
chown -R vscan:vscan /var/spool/amavis/.spamassassin
and now bayes score are showing up in the headers. Also, i tried the right
sa- database.
Thanks a bunch.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:12 PM, John Hardin wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, motty cruz wr
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, motty cruz wrote:
Thanks John,
It does not show up in any message at all!
here is the sa-learn --dump magic command:
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 4680 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 88357 0 non-token data: nham
Ok, so th
Thanks John,
It does not show up in any message at all!
here is the sa-learn --dump magic command:
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 4680 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 88357 0 n
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, motty cruz wrote:
here is the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3
tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.804, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, INVALID_DATE=0.432, MISSING_MID=0.14,
NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RDNS_NONE=2.013, SPF
here is the header:
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mydomain.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 5.243
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=5.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3
tests=[DATE_IN_PAST_12_24=0.804, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001,
FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, INVALID_DATE=0.432, MISSI
On Sep 17, 2009, at 13:35, Dan Schaefer
wrote:
In a general consensus for those who have customized your BAYES
scores, what are they?
I run from 4,5 (thought it was 5.0) to -3
What I'm NOT looking for is a lecture on how everybody's systems are
different.
But that is essentially true.
> In a general consensus for those who have customized your
> BAYES scores, what are they? I have been experimenting
> with them, but I have not been successful with a
> "perfect" score. What I'm NOT looking for is a lecture on
> how everybody's systems are different.
>
I have set BAYES_99 to 5,
On 17.09.09 15:35, Dan Schaefer wrote:
> In a general consensus for those who have customized your BAYES scores,
> what are they? I have been experimenting with them, but I have not been
> successful with a "perfect" score. What I'm NOT looking for is a lecture
> on how everybody's systems ar
In a general consensus for those who have customized your BAYES scores,
what are they? I have been experimenting with them, but I have not been
successful with a "perfect" score. What I'm NOT looking for is a lecture
on how everybody's systems are different.
Thanks,
Dan Schaefer
Web Developer/
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
snowweb wrote:
>
> I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and
> autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix
> editor. What's the solution to this? I was hoping to be able to tweak
> some of the scores and add
snowweb wrote:
> I tried to view the files bayes.toks, bayes.journal, bayes.seen and
> autowhitelist but they just look jibberish when opened in a unix editor.
> What's the solution to this?
>
The bayes database stores truncated SHA1 hashes of the words, it is not
reversible back to human readab
http://www.nabble.com/How-can-I-view-bayes-score-for-individual-words--tp24653720p24653720.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
First, by "check in debug mode" do you mean running spamassassin -D?
i was using spamassassin -dtD but as root user :-( and all bayes data
were learnt as root user too.
If so, are you SURE this is going to use the same bayes db as calling
spamc?
Important points to check before answering th
freightcar wrote:
>> First, by "check in debug mode" do you mean running spamassassin -D?
>
> i was using spamassassin -dtD but as root user :-( and all bayes data
> were learnt as root user too.
>
> that was exactly my problem. debug as root while spamd was running as
> spamd. now I updated /etc/m
It's the user's home directory.
The bayes db (as well as much more usefull to spamassassin) is in there.
Running SA from another user you get working another (possibly empty)
bayes db.
that is exactly it. i was running sa-learn as root (with
/root/.spammassassin db) and daemon was runn
First, by "check in debug mode" do you mean running spamassassin -D?
i was using spamassassin -dtD but as root user :-( and all bayes data were
learnt as root user too.
If so, are you SURE this is going to use the same bayes db as calling
spamc?
Important points to check before answering t
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 09:50:15 -0400, Giampaolo Tomassoni
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
man,you are damn right! :-) if i run it as SA user (mail) i get
BAYES_00.
so now what? ;-) is it the learnt data and permissions or what?
It's the user's home directory.
The bayes db (as well as much more use
freightcar wrote:
> exim 4.50, spamassassin 3.0.3
>
> I have spamd daemon running and when the message is checked
> automatically it gets BAYES_00 and when I check the same message in
> debug mode it gets BAYES_99 which means 6 pts less with default
> settings. all other test seem to get same resu
> man,you are damn right! :-) if i run it as SA user (mail) i get
> BAYES_00.
> so now what? ;-) is it the learnt data and permissions or what?
It's the user's home directory.
The bayes db (as well as much more usefull to spamassassin) is in there.
Running SA from another user you get working
> exim 4.50, spamassassin 3.0.3
>
> I have spamd daemon running and when the message is checked
> automatically
> it gets BAYES_00 and when I check the same message in debug mode it gets
> BAYES_99 which means 6 pts less with default settings. all other
> test seem
> to get same result. w
exim 4.50, spamassassin 3.0.3
I have spamd daemon running and when the message is checked automatically
it gets BAYES_00 and when I check the same message in debug mode it gets
BAYES_99 which means 6 pts less with default settings. all other test seem
to get same result. where could be the
I want to run just the bayes test on several files and get bayes scores
I tried writing my own script using Mail::SpamAssassin but thats seems
to not give any score at all.
Is there any ready script available
Or can I get any pointers
Thanks
Ram
At 01:17 AM 8/31/2005, Beast wrote:
Sorry, I mean from where it calculate 1.0 and 3.5?
Those are the spamassassin score. They aren't calculated on your end,
they're generated during the mass-checks done by the developers and
contributors.
To SA, bayes is just another group of rules. They ge
> Sorry, I mean from where it calculate 1.0 and 3.5?
It doesn't calculate those vaules. They are assigned in 50_scores.cf to the
5 or so BAYES_nn rules. So the probability of the mail being spam is say
67%, and this triggers the BAYES_60 rule, which has some score assigned in
the rule scores fil
Jeremy Kister wrote:
* 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80%
* [score: 0.6710]
67.1% likely to be spam
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
100% likely to be spam
Sorry, I mean from
At 01:06 AM 8/31/2005, Beast wrote:
What is the meaning of [score: ] in BAYES_* ?
That's the "bayes score" which is the probability of spam as calculated
from the bayesian statistics. It's in decimal form, so multiply by 100 if
you're used to dealing with pe
On 8/31/2005 1:06 AM, Beast wrote:
> What is the meaning of [score: ] in BAYES_* ?
multiply by 100; the product is the probability percentage of the
message being spam.
> * 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80%
> * [score: 0.6710]
67.1% likely to b
Hello,
What is the meaning of [score: ] in BAYES_* ?
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0 BAYES_60 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 60 to 80%
* [score: 0.6710]
* 11 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probabili
Matthew Yette wrote:
Dankos,
Put this into your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
user_scores_sql_custom_querySELECT preference, value FROM _TABLE_
WHERE username = _USERNAME_ OR username = '@GLOBAL' OR username =
_DOMAIN_ ORDER BY username ASC
That will make per-user preferences priority,
Hello Dhanny,
Sunday, July 31, 2005, 12:08:51 AM, you wrote:
DK> Hi,
DK>I installed qmail (only for smtp proxy) + spamassassin (userpref,
DK> bayes, awl store in mySQL). I use spamd and spamc to scan every email,
DK> but how can spamc scan email with personal configuration after scan
DK> with
Kosasih [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 31, 2005 3:09 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Personal Bayes Score
Hi,
I installed qmail (only for smtp proxy) + spamassassin (userpref,
bayes, awl store in mySQL). I use spamd and spamc to scan every email,
but how can spamc
Hi,
I installed qmail (only for smtp proxy) + spamassassin (userpref,
bayes, awl store in mySQL). I use spamd and spamc to scan every email,
but how can spamc scan email with personal configuration after scan
with global configuration ?
I want my user can configure bayesian, userpref, or awl for
forum wrote:
> I can found only Bayes.pm and method tokenize that is used when
> learning an e-mail.
> I want to know which file that is used to compute Bayes score for
> incomming mail
>
> Thanks
> Heng
1) why do you care?
2) look further into bayes.pm at sub compute_p
I can found only Bayes.pm and method tokenize that
is used when learning an e-mail.
I want to know which file that is used to compute
Bayes score for incomming mail
Thanks
Heng
35 matches
Mail list logo
