Filip Havlíček wrote:
Anybody can help with this? I still cannot find some helpful
information, thanks.
Dne 10.12.2014 v 14:52 Christian Grunfeld napsal(a):
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try
to setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will f
Anybody can help with this? I still cannot find some helpful
information, thanks.
Dne 10.12.2014 v 14:52 Christian Grunfeld napsal(a):
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try
to setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will fail
for non existent user
when you run bayes in SQL and does sa-learn --username it will not try to
setuid to that user (in a real system user scenario it will fail for non
existent users). Instead it uses that username to save and recall data from
database. Due to forged addresses your system treat any originating address
Hi,
I have configured spamasssin with bayes user rules with this configuration:
http://pastebin.com/KWW78DJx
I would like to ask you, if everything is correct, because I found in
table bayes_vars lot of (thousands) unknown email addresses like:
a...@hotmail.com
ablewi...@hotmail.com
abl...@hot
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > And every week I teach SpamAssassin with those mailboxes with script:
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > DIR=/var/spool/mail/prem-ekb.ru
> > sa-learn --clear
> > sa-learn --spam ${DIR}/s...
And every week I teach SpamAssassin with those mailboxes with script:
#!/bin/sh
DIR=/var/spool/mail/prem-ekb.ru
sa-learn --clear
sa-learn --spam ${DIR}/s...@prem-ekb.ru/cur/*S{a,}
In FreeBSD /bin/sh is a minimal POSIX bourne shell, brac
>> And every week I teach SpamAssassin with those mailboxes with script:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>> DIR=/var/spool/mail/prem-ekb.ru
>> sa-learn --clear
>> sa-learn --spam ${DIR}/s...@prem-ekb.ru/cur/*S{a,}
>
> In FreeBSD /bin/sh is a minimal POSIX
On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 00:33:51 +0600
?? wrote:
> Hi All!
> I've read a number of articles about a FreeBSD + Postfix + Dovecot +
> Amavisd + Clamav + SpamAssassin + MySQL system. And with these
> materials I set up a mail server.
> OS: Fre
On 11/23/2013 11:29 AM, Гуляев Гоша wrote:
Many thanks Benny and AxB ! I change SA to file store
bayes_path = /var/sb/bayes
bayes_file_mode = 0666
and now it works. After checking message from spam it has BAYES_99 header
Thank you a lot!
Good to hear it works.
Note:
Watch for locks if you're
Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-23 11:29:
But I think it will be good to investigate root of SQL-based problem
for developers :)
note is that mysql 5.5 is not yet stable on gentoo :)
google mysql 5.5 innodb, there is more then one bug there
Many thanks Benny and AxB ! I change SA to file store
bayes_path = /var/sb/bayes
bayes_file_mode = 0666
and now it works. After checking message from spam it has BAYES_99 header
Thank you a lot!
But I think it will be good to investigate root of SQL-based problem for
developers :)
23.11.2013, 16:07, "Axb" :
> According to your --dump magic info, I assume you're running a rather
> small system.
>
> If indeed low traffic, are you really sure you *need* Bayes in MySQL?
> (low traffic = less than 50k accepted msgs/day)
>
> Running file based Bayes would make your life much simp
Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-23 11:01:
Additional info:
Now my SQL scheme for spamass database are in MyISAM (after that
number of records after script work, about 140 000, with InnoDB it be
220 000)
i have seen this aswell, not always exact counted there when using
innodb, i dont think its u
According to your --dump magic info, I assume you're running a rather
small system.
If indeed low traffic, are you really sure you *need* Bayes in MySQL?
(low traffic = less than 50k accepted msgs/day)
Running file based Bayes would make your life much simpler.
Additional info:
Now my SQL scheme for spamass database are in MyISAM (after that number of
records after script work, about 140 000, with InnoDB it be 220 000)
And in script databases first flushes, so I don't understand why number of
records are changed with table engine.
My terminal are in u
23.11.2013, 15:38, "Benny Pedersen" :
> Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-23 10:10:
>
>> Benny thanks a lot for your attention!
>>
>> I install that modules.
>> Now all modules are installed, and I think maybe that lines are
>> reasons of problem:
>
> replyed offlist, if my sql setup solves it, m
Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-23 10:10:
Benny thanks a lot for your attention!
I install that modules.
Now all modules are installed, and I think maybe that lines are
reasons of problem:
replyed offlist, if my sql setup solves it, make a bug report if you
used setup from spamassassin and it
Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-23 09:11:
ноя 23 13:56:32.056 [91453] dbg: diag: [...] module not installed:
Mail::SPF ('require' failed)
ноя 23 13:56:32.056 [91453] dbg: diag: [...] module not installed:
IP::Country::Fast ('require' failed)
ноя 23 13:56:32.056 [91453] dbg: diag: [...] module not
Гуляев Гоша skrev den 2013-11-22 19:33:
trusted_networks 127. 192.168.3. 192.168.4. 192.168.5.
192.168.6. 192.168.7. 192.168.12.
remove 127.
whitelist_factory Mail::SpamAssassin::SQLBasedAddrList
user_awl_dsn DBI:mysql:spamass:localhost
user_awl_sql_usernamespamass
Hi All!
I've read a number of articles about a FreeBSD + Postfix + Dovecot + Amavisd +
Clamav + SpamAssassin + MySQL system. And with these materials I set up a mail
server.
OS: FreeBSD dom.local 8.4-STABLE FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #0: Sun Jul 7 09
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
If bayes can be used how can I mo
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury schrieb:
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
Sujit Acharyya-Choudhury wrote:
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
I
We are using spamassassin at the gateway level with exim. Is it a good
idea to use bayes as we don't know which is ham or spam - and the users
are unlikely to give us the feed back from different system. In that
case bayes learning ability will be compromised.
If bayes can be used how can I modi
Andrew Donkin wrote:
So I tried to convert bayes_token to InnoDB to take advantage of its
row-level locking (this is advised by the developers but not reflected
in bayes_mysql.sql). After MySQL worked on that for a few days I
stopped it, dropped the database (innodb was very confused), and
recre
Hi, people. This started as a plea for help but ended as a report of
an investigation, so hopefully it will be a useful addition to the
archives.
About 1% of my scans were taking more than 300 seconds. Extra
debugging in spamd showed me that the Bayes checks were the culprit:
13:38:05 spamd[16
Hello to all.
WHile I've been running sendmail/spamassassin/clamav/mailscanner/mailwatch
successfully for some time. Up to now, I've largely been using sare
rulesets, and have had quite good success. But recently I've been trained
bayes.
Is there an "optimal" combination of bayes and other r
27 matches
Mail list logo
