On 10/12/07, Michael Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Two options, since you're using spamc/spamd.
>
> 1) Put user configs into SQL and for user nobody set use_bayes 0, you
> might get similar results if you give user nobody an actual home
> directory and a user_prefs file, but I've never tried
On 10/12/07, John D. Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some options:
>
> (1) turn off autolearn.
>
> (2) if you suspect auto-mistraining then adjust your auto-training
> thresholds.
>
> (3) zap nobody's bayes database nightly (hourly?) in cron.
Yeah, I'm turning on autozap today :P
> John Hard
Jason Frisvold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question. Is it possible to set up spamassassin to use Bayes
> only if the -u option is passed via spamc? I'm using simscan to call
> spamassassin and if the user is not specified, it falls back to the
> nobody account. The bay
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Jason Frisvold wrote:
> The bayesian database fills up with tons of tokens that I believe
> are hurting, rather than helping, the identification of spam.
Some options:
(1) turn off autolearn.
(2) if you suspect auto-mistraining then adjust your auto-training
thresholds.
(
Hi all,
Quick question. Is it possible to set up spamassassin to use Bayes
only if the -u option is passed via spamc? I'm using simscan to call
spamassassin and if the user is not specified, it falls back to the
nobody account. The bayesian database fills up with tons of tokens
that I be
This can happen if there is contention for the Bayes db.
Try running spamd with "-D" and compare output from that.
--j.
Jeremy Kister writes:
> I have an odd problem where given the /same/ input spamd, bayes will be
> triggered sometimes, and not others. I cannot replicate the problem
> send
I have an odd problem where given the /same/ input spamd, bayes will be
triggered sometimes, and not others. I cannot replicate the problem
sending the input to spamassassin (bayes always shows up when piping to
spamassassin).
for example:
given the soruce at:
http://jeremy.kister.net/tmp/11
Hum. Bayes only seems like a waste, there are probably
simpler tools if that is all you really want to do. A whole lot of the
capability of SA comes from the other rules.
However, I suppose you could either delete the rules from the two rules
directories, or perhaps more simply and
People,
how do I get spamd to work without the non-bayes rules?
I used to just disable
the /usr/shared/spamassassin folder, but that seems to fail the
app
Thanks in
advance.
Maurice