On Saturday 25 November 2006 9:46 am, Bob Mortimer wrote:
> On Saturday 25 November 2006 15:26, Chris wrote:
> > I've installed the VBounce Ruleset and it tags bounce messages
> > correctly, however, I'm pretty much lost when it comes to writing other
> > than a simple procmail recipe. So if someo
On Saturday 25 November 2006 15:26, Chris wrote:
> I've installed the VBounce Ruleset and it tags bounce messages correctly,
> however, I'm pretty much lost when it comes to writing other than a simple
> procmail recipe. So if someone could lend a hand I'd be very much
>
> appreciative. What I h
On Thursday 23 November 2006 4:26 am, Justin Mason wrote:
> There's also a SpamAssassin ruleset --
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/VBounceRuleset .
>
> --j.
I've installed the VBounce Ruleset and it tags bounce messages correctly,
however, I'm pretty much lost when it comes to writing other
Bob Proulx writes:
> Mick Pollard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:34 -0600, Chris wrote:
> > > I've gotten about 500 of these today and its getting to be hell weeding
> > > through them to pull out my LARTs which are also bouncing. Any
> > > ideas/suggestions are whole heartedly welcome.
> >
Mick Pollard wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:34 -0600, Chris wrote:
> > I've gotten about 500 of these today and its getting to be hell weeding
> > through them to pull out my LARTs which are also bouncing. Any
> > ideas/suggestions are whole heartedly welcome.
>
> This may be useful. I haven't
Ramprasad wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:34 -0600, Chris wrote:
I've been receiving tons of supposed bounces from Peru saying I've sent
messages to non-existant address using a [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
One such bounce is below:
Return-Path: <>
Received: from pop.earthlink.net [209.86.
On Wed, 2006-11-22 at 19:34 -0600, Chris wrote:
> I've been receiving tons of supposed bounces from Peru saying I've sent
> messages to non-existant address using a [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
> One such bounce is below:
>
> Return-Path: <>
> Received: from pop.earthlink.net [209.86.93.201]
I've been receiving tons of supposed bounces from Peru saying I've sent
messages to non-existant address using a [EMAIL PROTECTED] address.
One such bounce is below:
Return-Path: <>
Received: from pop.earthlink.net [209.86.93.201]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [
