At 02:06 PM 1/28/2005, breena wrote:
Thank you Matt =). So most of the heuristics seem to be looking for SPAM.
What are the ones that would push a mail towards being HAM (and that are not
ignored by autolearn bayes)? So far I have found one: ALL_TRUSTED.
A few network tests also qualify:
Thank you Matt =). So most of the heuristics seem to be looking for SPAM.
What are the ones that would push a mail towards being HAM (and that are not
ignored by autolearn bayes)? So far I have found one: ALL_TRUSTED.
Thanks!
Breena
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:41:12 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote
> At
At 05:37 PM 1/25/2005, breena wrote:
I have been checking my logs and it seems that even when an email comes in
with a whitelisted address (making its score below the default threshold for
autolearn ham), it is not learned as ham. According to the logs, nothing is
ever autolearned as ham. Does au
I have been checking my logs and it seems that even when an email comes in
with a whitelisted address (making its score below the default threshold for
autolearn ham), it is not learned as ham. According to the logs, nothing is
ever autolearned as ham. Does autolearn ignore the whitelisted mails?
