Also you can rename the file and restart things to get it recreated most
likely.
On Sun, Jan 20, 2019, 06:03 Giovanni Bechis On 1/20/19 8:33 AM, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> > My auto-whitelist file appears corrupted. File size is about 5
> megabytes. Spamassassin says it can’t be o
On 1/20/19 8:33 AM, Palvelin Postmaster wrote:
> My auto-whitelist file appears corrupted. File size is about 5 megabytes.
> Spamassassin says it can’t be opened. So does sa-awl.
>
> Is there any other way to try to recover the file or should I just accept my
> losses and re
My auto-whitelist file appears corrupted. File size is about 5 megabytes.
Spamassassin says it can’t be opened. So does sa-awl.
Is there any other way to try to recover the file or should I just accept my
losses and recreate it?
--
Palvelin.fi Hostmaster
postmas...@palvelin.fi
T
he AWL plugin in v310.pre
was disabled!
By enabling that and give enough permission it's working
thanks
On 07/11/2013 01:01 PM, Moein Sarvi wrote:
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf":
auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
is the AWL plugin enabled in v310.pre ?
if yes
please post the full output from
- SA version
- sp
warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in "/etc/spamassassin/local.cf":
auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
On 07/11/2013 12:53 PM, Moein Sarvi wrote:
hi
I can't set this command in local.cf and in --lint mode I face some error
auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
"some error" is not very descriptive (helpful)
What error?
hi
I can't set this command in local.cf and in --lint mode I face some error
auto_whitelist_path /etc/mail/spamassassin/auto-whitelist
Den 2012-07-26 17:32, Nißl Reinhard skrev:
So how can I shrink that huge Berkley-DB file?
change to sql (mysql or postgresql)
then add timestamp to each table, so lastchange is the unix time it
hitted last, when that is working expire is simple in cron :=)
its just still todo with berkdb i
Hi,
before the upgrade to 3.3 (to be precise: spamassassin-3.3.2), AWL was enabled
and working for years with spamassassin 3.1. Over time auto-whitelist has grown
to 2.6 GB.
I tried sa-awl as mentioned in the manuals to have a look at the contents, but
it was eating up all memory and swap
Works like a charm!
Bug raised (6415).
Thanks very much sir!
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Mark Martinec [mailto:mark.martinec...@ijs.si]
Sent: April 18, 2010 5:48 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Open of auto-whitelist file failed: Insecure dependency in
eval...
On
rts an error in the spamd.log file:
>
> Sun Apr 18 15:21:10 2010 [7966] warn: auto-whitelist:
> open of auto-whitelist file failed:
> Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch
> at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 996.
Yes, a bu
Chris Welch wrote on Sun, 18 Apr 2010 15:33:20 -0400:
> I just upgraded a CentOS 5.4 system to Spamassassin 3.3.1. The upgrade was
> done by a CPAN install with Perl.
which you should not do. Unless there is *no* other chance a Perl or modules
or Perl programs on an rpm-based system should be u
-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist
file failed: Insecure dependency in eval while running with -T switch at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line 996.
I tried numerous permission changes but can't clear the error.
Spamassassin is launched using:
/usr/bin/spamd -u ex
I installed
postfix-2.6.5
amavis-new-2.6.4
spamassassin-3.3.0
amavis home is /var/spool/amavisd
I create /var/spool/amavisd/.spamassassin (drwx--)
Now I want create in this directory auto-whitelist and user_prefs files.
How can I do?
Thanks
Andrea
Karsten Bräckelmann rudersport.de> writes:
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:50 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> > >
> > > For more info and the script's link see
> > > http://markmail.org/message/qqsm35q5bqpbb3in
> >
> > (For the lazy, the original hack is at
> > http://www.deepnet.cx/~kdeugau/spamtool
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 10:50 -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > I use Kris Deugau's trim_whitelist -- though very infrequently, just
> > when I spot the DB gets out of hand. That hack seems to works perfectly
> > for me.
> >
> > For more info and the script's link see
> >
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
I use Kris Deugau's trim_whitelist -- though very infrequently, just
when I spot the DB gets out of hand. That hack seems to works perfectly
for me.
For more info and the script's link see
http://markmail.org/message/qqsm35q5bqpbb3in
(For the lazy, the original hac
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 19:49 +, Henry Kwan wrote:
> Just noticed that my AWL is up to 83MB. Not sure if it should be that large
> so
Well, it keeps track of all sender addresses it sees, including the
forged ones which usually hit your site once only...
> I ran check_whitelist and it removed
On 27-May-2009, at 13:49, Henry Kwan wrote:
Just noticed that my AWL is up to 83MB. Not sure if it should be
that large so
I ran check_whitelist and it removed the single entries but did not
compact the
file. I then checked the SA site and it said to use sa-awlUtil but
I can't find
this ut
Just noticed that my AWL is up to 83MB. Not sure if it should be that large so
I ran check_whitelist and it removed the single entries but did not compact the
file. I then checked the SA site and it said to use sa-awlUtil but I can't find
this utility on my system. Was it included in the standar
Dennis German wrote:
> Is there a utility to display auto-whitelist ?
There's the check_whitelist script in the tarball which will dump a AWL
database, assuming it's in db_file format not SQL
> Modify entries?
No, but you can fake a +100 or -100 point email into the sco
Is there a utility to display auto-whitelist ?
Modify entries? remove entries?
On Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:20:06 +0100
mouss wrote:
> Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
> > Hello.
> >
> > I use FreeBSD 7.0 and p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5. In my logs, sometimes, I
> > see this message:
> >
> > Jan 31 22:36:09 * spamd[17781]: auto-whitelist:
Nicolas Letellier a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I use FreeBSD 7.0 and p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5. In my logs, sometimes, I
> see this message:
>
> Jan 31 22:36:09 ***** spamd[17781]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist
> file failed: Out of memory during ridiculously large req
Hello.
I use FreeBSD 7.0 and p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5. In my logs, sometimes, I see
this message:
Jan 31 22:36:09 * spamd[17781]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file
failed: Out of memory during ridiculously large request at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/Mail/SpamAssassin
md appears to be abandoning
un-closed.
>>
>> I'm currently running SpamAssassin 3.2.5 under Activestate perl
5.8.8.822.
>>
>> It appears that spamd fails to close the file handle to bayes_seen or
>> auto-whitelist when it's done with it.
>>
>> spamd
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 03:42:05PM -0500, Dan Barker wrote:
> How do I go about trapping this error in locker? (Specifically, how do I
> figure out who Called locker, to find the code that's not closing the file
> it opened?)
>
> Has anyone else run into this sort of issue?
The last time this sor
hat spamd fails to close the file handle to bayes_seen or
auto-whitelist when it's done with it.
spamd -x -D, filtered on "auto-whitelist" shows:
--- 9 line(2) not displayed ---
[1504] dbg: auto-whitelist: DB addr list: untie-ing and unlocking
[1504] dbg: auto-whitelist: DB addr li
hat spamd fails to close the file handle to bayes_seen or
auto-whitelist when it's done with it.
spamd -x -D, filtered on "auto-whitelist" shows:
--- 9 line(2) not displayed ---
[1504] dbg: auto-whitelist: DB addr list: untie-ing and unlocking
[1504] dbg: auto-whitelist: DB addr li
Brent Clark wrote:
Hi
I recently installed spamassasin on my freebsd test machine. For the
likes of me, I keep getting this message, and I dont know how to fix it.
Aug 6 17:06:43 spamassasin spamd[63534]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create
Hi
I recently installed spamassasin on my freebsd test machine. For the
likes of me, I keep getting this message, and I dont know how to fix it.
Aug 6 17:06:43 spamassasin spamd[63534]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp
lockfile
On 26.06.08 10:06, Skip Morrow wrote:
> I see, and got it working. Next question: How would I set it up so that
> I could have a separate whitelist for each user (I only have four users)?
it's the default
> Again, I call spamassassin from procmail, and each user has its own
> procmailrc,
then
> That option wasn't removed from SA.. it was removed from the main conf
> docs, as all of the AWL is now a plugin. That option is documented in the
> docs for the AWL plugin, which is where it really belongs. (if the option
> isn't valid without the plugin, then it in theory shouldn't be in the ma
On Thu, June 26, 2008 05:56, Matt Kettler wrote:
> the docs for the AWL plugin, which is where it really belongs. (if the
> option isn't valid without the plugin, then it in theory shouldn't be in
> the main Conf manpage..)
there is still docs for bayes in conf, even bayes is a plugin now
needs
On Thu, June 26, 2008 05:16, Skip wrote:
> option with my own configuration file, and I should be able to pass it
> the -C or --siteconfigpath options to set admin settings. Any help?
AWL and BAYES will when procmail is in use be in $HOME./spamassassin/
but can be overwrited in user_prefs with
Skip wrote:
How does one set the file location for the auto-whitelist file on a
3.2.x system? I am on a shared hosting system, but call spamassassin
manually from procmail. Here's the debug output that deals with
auto-whitelist:
[25947] dbg: locker: safe_lock: created
/ramdis
How does one set the file location for the auto-whitelist file on a
3.2.x system? I am on a shared hosting system, but call spamassassin
manually from procmail. Here's the debug output that deals with
auto-whitelist:
[25947] dbg: locker: safe_lock: created
/ramdisk/etc/spamassassin
- Original Message -
From: "Obantec Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:12 AM
Subject: open of auto-whitelist file failed
Hi
SA 3.2.4 on FC3
spamd is started by script and is running as root.
maillog shows various users with
spamd[5648]
Hi
SA 3.2.4 on FC3
spamd is started by script and is running as root.
maillog shows various users with
spamd[5648]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed:
auto-whitelist: cannot open auto_whitelist_path
/home/domain/domain71/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist
No such file or
On 06.04.2008 03:26 CE(S)T, Matt Kettler wrote:
The "new fangled" way would be to use spamc for learning instead of
sa-learn.
And yes, it's a lot faster I believe.
--
Yves Goergen "LonelyPixel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Visit my web laboratory at http://beta.unclassified.de
On 06.04.2008 03:26 CE(S)T, Matt Kettler wrote:
Yves Goergen wrote:
Just remember to su to that user when running sa-learn.
This is getting a problem now! My spamd user has no access on the
mailbox directories from which I am usually learning. What's the
proposed solution for that?
The "new
Yves Goergen wrote:
Just remember to su to that user when running sa-learn.
This is getting a problem now! My spamd user has no access on the
mailbox directories from which I am usually learning. What's the
proposed solution for that?
Well, there's a couple of ways to deal with that..
The
On 05.04.2008 01:18 CE(S)T, Matt Kettler wrote:
Spamd will never be able to access anything in /root/. 3.1.8 shouldn't
have been able to do so any more than 3.2.4 could, but that might have
been a bug..
Must have been a bug, yes.
If you're always scanning mail as one user, you can create a
n
pamd[14283]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create lockfile
/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.mutex: Permission denied
Spamd will never be able to access anything in /root/. 3.1.8 shouldn't
have been able to do so any more than 3.2.4 could,
Hello,
I have upgraded SpamAssassin from 3.1.8 to 3.2.4 today. First I got
errors about a "nonexistent" path all the time. Then I added the path to
the auto_whitelist directory in local.cf. Now I get this error message
every few seconds:
Apr 4 20:01:36 mond spamd[14283]: auto
Noah wrote:
Hi there list,
I installed the following spamassasin proggies on my FreeBSD machine
and receiving an error "auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock:
cannot create tmp lockfile"
Any clues what I am doing wrong?
# pkg_info | grep Spam
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.
Hi there list,
I installed the following spamassasin proggies on my FreeBSD machine and
receiving an error "auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock:
cannot create tmp lockfile"
Any clues what I am doing wrong?
# pkg_info | grep Spam
p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.3 A highly effi
Tammy George wrote:
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> Few questions - will running 'check_whitelist' affect our server's
> performance?
It really shouldn't. It's a pretty lightweight tool, and will only
remove "one off" entries by default.
If you're concerned, you can also execute it through the "
George wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Our Linux server is running SpamAssassin version 3.1.5.
>
> Backups started dying with 'inactivity timeout'. Dug around & found
> the following:
>
> drwx-- 3 vscan vscan512 Jul 18 16:28 .
> -rw--- 1 vscan vsc
- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18 16:28 auto-whitelist
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1205862400 Jul 18 16:28 bayes_seen
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 10846208 Jul 18 16:28 bayes_toks
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 18240 Jul 18 16:28 bayes_journal
> drwxr-x---
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 09:30:25PM -0300, Tammy George wrote:
> -rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18 16:28 auto-whitelist
> A du -k shows auto-whitelist as being 1747968.
Ah, the magic of sparse files. :)
> After I send this email, I'm going to look into check
Hello.
Our Linux server is running SpamAssassin version 3.1.5.
Backups started dying with 'inactivity timeout'. Dug around & found the
following:
drwx-- 3 vscan vscan512 Jul 18 16:28 .
-rw--- 1 vscan vscan 1099983372288 Jul 18 16:28 auto-whitelist
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Directories should have RWX permessions, not RW.
>
> In Directories, X takes on a different meaning, and refers to the
> ability to list files in the directory.. Without that, apps can only
> open files they already know the exact name of.
No the 'r' bit
Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>
>
> Here is the permissions for the folder:
> drw-rw-rw-2 root nobody 4096 Mar 8 14:35 spamassassin/
Directories should have RWX permessions, not RW.
In Directories, X takes on a different meaning, and refers to the
ability to list files in the directory.. W
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote:
>
> Why does a directory need execute permissions?
For directories, the "x" bit makes it traversable. That means if
/foo/ has permissions drw-rw-rw-, then you can read (and write) the
directory but you can't get to any of any of th
; Balmer is basically saying: We know there's a problem but we're not going
> to
> tell you what it is because we want to ambush you in the future.
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Auto-whitelist-Errors---others.-tf3371373.html#a9386624
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Thursday 08 March 2007 19:46, Andrew Rosolino wrote:
> Why does a directory need execute permissions?
Because you can't use it and you can't move into it unless it does.
--
Balmer is basically saying: We know there's a problem but we're not going to
tell you what it is because we want to amb
y 4096 Mar 8 14:35 spamassassin/
>
> That's definitely not going to work. 0777, not 0666 (directory, not a
> file).
>
> --
> Randomly Selected Tagline:
> "You can't build a reputation on what you are going to do." - Henry Ford
>
>
>
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 11:44:31AM -0800, Andrew Rosolino wrote:
> Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: setuid to root succeeded
> Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: spamd: still running as root: user not
> specified with -u, not found, or set to root, falling back to nobody at
> /usr/bi
cannot create tmp
lockfile
/var/spool/spamassassin/auto_whitelist.lock.penguin.leapcash.com.15553 for
/var/spool/spamassassin/auto_whitelist.lock: Permission denied
Mar 8 14:42:32 penguin spamd[15553]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist
file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfil
Hey guys,
Im head butting a wall here trying to get SQL
auto-whilist to work. I cant seem to get even the --lint test to recognise
sql auto-whilist. The plugin loads, and there are no errors reported during
the --lint test.
Instructions used from:
http://wiki.apache.org/spam
I am testing auto-whitelist (generic auto-whitelist, no per user) and with
my check_whitelist I have
-2.8(-2.8/1) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.7(-2.7/4) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-1.7(-1.7/3) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.3
On Sat, October 21, 2006 21:18, Magnus Anderson wrote:
> The Bayes are working, but the AWL are not.
is AWL plugin loaded in ?
> Is there some problem in SA 3.14 for this?
not to what i know of
--
"This message was sent using 100% recycled spam mails."
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Sat, October 21, 2006 11:54, Magnus Anderson wrote:
>
>> If someone knows how to solve this problem I would be very happy.
>
> give the users there own mysql db is one solution
>
> another is to define mysql db in site wide config
>
> where overwrite username is not u
On Sat, October 21, 2006 11:54, Magnus Anderson wrote:
> If someone knows how to solve this problem I would be very happy.
give the users there own mysql db is one solution
another is to define mysql db in site wide config
where overwrite username is not used, this should work for unix acoount
looks good.
[8494] dbg: plugin: registering glue method for
check_from_in_auto_whitelist
(Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::AWL=HASH(0xa589130))
[8494] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based connected to
DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost
[8494] dbg: auto-whitelist: sql-based using username: root
[8494] dbg: auto-whit
I am moving my email to a new server. How do I ensure that the procmail
bayseian database and auto whitelist for each user is moved too?
Should I just copy ~/.spamassassin/* for each user?
Here is the contents for my ~/.spamassassin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.spamassassin $ ls -l
total 37636
-rw
)
Shall I issue a sa-learn --force-expire command ?
Does it supposed to work ?
Stephane
-Message d'origine-
De : Stéphane LEPREVOST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : vendredi 1 septembre 2006 10:18
À : 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Objet : RE: Very big auto-whitelist fi
here too... Is there a way to
fix it or to trim the file ?
Stephane
-Message d'origine-
De : Stéphane LEPREVOST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 31 août 2006 22:39
À : 'users@spamassassin.apache.org'
Objet : RE: Very big auto-whitelist file
Thanks Kris for
Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote:
As you noticed, I get worried very very very late... But in fact I wasn't in
charge of spamassassin when we first saw this growth, that's why I'm back on
the problem only now... I guess I'll pay more attention to this now ;D
It became a problem for me with a 10G hard
the problem only now... I guess I'll pay more attention to this now ;D
Stephane
-Message d'origine-
De : Kris Deugau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : jeudi 31 août 2006 21:58
À : users@spamassassin.apache.org
Objet : Re: Very big auto-whitelist file
Roger Taranto wrote:
>
Thanks Logan, it was a good idea to check the du -k :
696046 auto-whitelist
Looks like the file is half used in fact...
Regarding the volume, I have about 4 messages by day including spam, and
if I remember well, I thing this file has never been cleared...
Stephane
-Message
Roger Taranto wrote:
There's an additional tool to run after you run check_whitelist. It's
called trim_whitelist, and it compacts the db file. I can't remember
where I found it, but you should be able to google for it. It should
reduce the size of your db file quite a bit.
That would be the
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 09:00, Stéphane LEPREVOST wrote:
> A little question about AWL : I have an auto_whitelist how looks VERY
> HUGE to me :
> -rw---1 root root 1241124864 Aug 31 17:51
> auto-whitelist
>
> Do you think a 1.2 Gb AWL file is NORMAL ?
>
&
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, St?phane LEPREVOST wrote:
A little question about AWL : I have an auto_whitelist how looks VERY HUGE
to me :
-rw---1 root root 1241124864 Aug 31 17:51 auto-whitelist
Do you think a 1.2 Gb AWL file is NORMAL ?
You might try typing "du -k auto-whit
A little question
about AWL : I have an auto_whitelist how looks VERY HUGE to me
:
-rw--- 1 root
root 1241124864 Aug 31 17:51
auto-whitelist
Do you think a 1.2
Gb AWL file is NORMAL ?
I don't think so and
plan to use check_whitelist tool to clean it, something
Thomas Schlosser wrote on Sat, 10 Jun 2006 20:08:42 +0200:
> Jun 10 20:00:02 homesrv spamd[7041]: mkdir /root/.spamassassin:
> My spamd was started with
> /usr/bin/spamd --daemonize --username spamfilt
This user isn't allowed to write to /root, but you got a mail for root ...
At least that's w
n/auto-whitelist.lock.homesrv.schlosser-ma.de.7041 for /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock: Keine Berechtigung
Jun 10 20:00:02 homesrv spamd[7041]: auto-whitelist: open of auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile /root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist.lock.homesrv.schlosser
roblem this has posed is that there's no convenient way for
users to modify entries in the auto-whitelist file. Some spam (mostly
mortgage offers with obfuscated text) that came in before bayes was
retrained got scored low, and consequently the AWL scores are pulling
the total score for new sp
On 4/26/06, Rosenbaum, Larry M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ...
> > (Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
> > was dropped?)
>
> It hasn't been dropped; they just moved
> From: Bart Schaefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ...
> (Someone remind me why the spamd option to disable the auto-whitelist
> was dropped? I could instead "chmod 0" the auto-whitelist file, I
> suppose, but then the maillog is cluttered with extra warning output,
>
enient way for
users to modify entries in the auto-whitelist file. Some spam (mostly
mortgage offers with obfuscated text) that came in before bayes was
retrained got scored low, and consequently the AWL scores are pulling
the total score for new spam from the same source back down below the
5.0 th
It's better with a subject :(
I want to use SA for a lot of users which don't have home directory.
There mails are in /var/mail. The spammed mails are send to the
recipient in his file /var/mail/user with the addition of SA.
The bayes and auto-whitelist database will be commun
I tried to do a makedb -u on the .spamassassin/auto-whitelist file, but
it failed with:
makedb: cannot open database file `/root/.spamassassin/auto-whitelist':
Invalid argument
Is there a handy way to manipulate this db manually (no pun intended)?
Thanks,
-Philip
Is it possible to manage auto-withelist?
I am testing auto-whitelist and with my check_whitelist I have
-2.8(-2.8/1) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.7(-2.7/4) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-1.7(-1.7/3) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=none
-2.3
Am Freitag, den 23.12.2005, 01:02 +0100 schrieb Marcus Sobchak:
> today I've upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.1.0 (on debian). Spam detection
> works fine, but from time to time I have these errors in my mail.log:
>
>
> Dec 22 23:44:23 walter spamd[8985]: auto-white
Hi,
today I've upgraded from 3.0.4 to 3.1.0 (on debian). Spam detection
works fine, but from time to time I have these errors in my mail.log:
Dec 22 23:44:23 walter spamd[8985]: auto-whitelist: open of
auto-whitelist file failed: locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp
lockfile
/var/
On Jul 18, 2005, at 9:08 AM, Dr Robert Young wrote:
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give
strong negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a
"clean" or re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
You've already aske
On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Dr Robert Young wrote:
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give strong
negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a "clean" or
re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
man spamassassin
--remove-addr-from-w
I have some entries in the auto-whitelist that are "bogus" and give
strong negative scores. How would one remove them w/out doing a
"clean" or re-creating the auto-whitelist from scratch?
Mike Pepe wrote:
> I'm getting more and more spams sneaking through lately.
>
> I'm running SA 3.0.4 on Fedora Core 3.
>
> In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users in my
> domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the spam lowe
On Jun 22, 2005, at 9:36 PM, Mike Pepe wrote:
In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users
in my domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the
spam lower than if I run it through manually without that test.
I'm sure others may chime in to say that
I'm getting more and more spams sneaking through lately.
I'm running SA 3.0.4 on Fedora Core 3.
In analyzing the ones that make it through, I see that other users in my
domain are CC, which causes the auto-whitelist to score the spam lower
than if I run it through manually without
Hi,
I would like to get rid of all the entries in the auto-whitelist.db, because
it is allowing unwanted spam through, and it contains low values due to
razor not properly installed. Can I stop amavis, delete the file and startup
amavis again?
Regards,
Nicki de Wet
Application Integration Sol
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 09:09:39AM +, Fredrik Bjork wrote:
> Surely there is a better way, but nobody seems to be willing to post it...
tools/check_whitelist? Been part of the standard distro for ages. Output is:
0.0 (0.0/2) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=66.92
Average Score (tot
Fredrik Bjork wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have seen a couple of requests for reading the auto-whitelist file in plain
> text. You can use at least two database formats, but this command worked for
> me:
>
> dbmmanage auto-whitelist view
> Surely there is a better way, but no
Hi!
I have seen a couple of requests for reading the auto-whitelist file in plain
text. You can use at least two database formats, but this command worked for me:
dbmmanage auto-whitelist view
See man dbmmanage for more info (available in most Linux distributions). It
is
written to
William R Thomas wrote:
I had some questions about how the auto whitelist score was
generated. Specifically, it seems like it is working opposite to the
way it should be in some cases.
The equation for the AWL score is:
( meanscore - currentscore) * factor
You were exactly correct, I was seeing the AwlWrongWay problem (maybe
phenomena is a better term) and didn't turn up anything on google
about it, and was vastly confused.
I wish I would have checked my email again before sending the full
explanation.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 04:03:49PM -0500, M
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
