Re: "DoS" against amavisd-new and SA 3.0

2004-10-19 Thread Thomas Kaehn
Hello Matt, On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:23:06AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote: > man Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL > > uridnsbl_timeout N (default: 2) > Specify the maximum number of seconds to wait for a result before > giving up on the lookup. Note that this is in addition

Re: "DoS" against amavisd-new and SA 3.0

2004-10-18 Thread Matt Kettler
At 10:50 AM 10/18/2004, Thomas Kaehn wrote: Hi, I am using amavisd-new along with SpamAssassin 3.0. Recently I've noticed, that a mail couldn't be delivered, because SA timed out as it had to do many DNS lookups. The mail had lots of URLs in its body. It is not really SpamAssassin's or amavisd-new'

"DoS" against amavisd-new and SA 3.0

2004-10-18 Thread Thomas Kaehn
Hi, I am using amavisd-new along with SpamAssassin 3.0. Recently I've noticed, that a mail couldn't be delivered, because SA timed out as it had to do many DNS lookups. The mail had lots of URLs in its body. It is not really SpamAssassin's or amavisd-new's fault. But is there a solution to this p

Re: amavisd-new and SA 3.0

2004-09-13 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Dan Karney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have the RH EL3 factory installed version of SA on my system (2.55) > and use procmail to pass the mail from postfix to SA. I want to add > virus scanning, so my plan is to switch to using amavisd-new + ClamAV > + SA. amavisd-new must be new enough to be abl

amavisd-new and SA 3.0

2004-09-13 Thread Dan Karney
I have the RH EL3 factory installed version of SA on my system (2.55) and use procmail to pass the mail from postfix to SA. I want to add virus scanning, so my plan is to switch to using amavisd-new + ClamAV + SA. Will there be any problems upgrading to SA 3.0 with this setup? Is there a better w