Re: Question about SPF checks

2005-06-07 Thread Matt Kettler
Ronny Nussbaum wrote: > Hello, > I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't. > > I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora > Core 3. > > I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine. > > My question is, how can I disable it from being used

Re: Question about SPF checks

2005-06-07 Thread alan premselaar
Ronny Nussbaum wrote: Hello, I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't. I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora Core 3. I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine. My question is, how can I disable it from being used by SA? I'm l

Question about SPF checks

2005-06-07 Thread Ronny Nussbaum
Hello, I've tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't.   I'm using SA 3.0.3, invoked by Amavisd-New (latest version), on Fedora Core 3.   I've installed the Mail::SPF::Query module, and it works fine.   My question is, how can I disable it from being used by SA?   I'm looking for another way be

RE: about SPF

2005-04-13 Thread martin smith
M> M>Martin, the mail didn't go through the same server. Is it possible M>that you've omitted 212.250.162.17 from your list of trusted_networks? M>This would cause an SPF failure. M> M>When I set my trusted_networks to 212.250.162.0/24 and run these M>messages through, they both get SPF_PASS.

Re: about SPF

2005-04-12 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
martin smith wrote: M> M>Could you please forward a few complete messages that M>incorrectly get an SPF fail with the patch applied. M> M>The patch has no effect on SPF_HELO tests. M> M> M>Daryl M> Looks like I have to put mail.apache.org as a trusted server for this list to pass the spf test, the

RE: about SPF

2005-04-12 Thread martin smith
ts=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:07:57 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 03:08:04 -0400 From: "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1

Re: about SPF

2005-04-12 Thread Daryl C. W. O'Shea
martin smith wrote: M>I had the same problem. It turns out that if the email is being M>relayed through trusted or internal hosts, SA will skip the M>SPF checks on the belief that it cannot trust that one of M>those hosts hasn't M>changed the envelope headers.I ended up opening an enhance

RE: about SPF

2005-04-12 Thread martin smith
M>I had the same problem. It turns out that if the email is being M>relayed through trusted or internal hosts, SA will skip the M>SPF checks on the belief that it cannot trust that one of M>those hosts hasn't M>changed the envelope headers.I ended up opening an enhancement M>request to a

Re: about SPF

2005-04-11 Thread Kevin Peuhkurinen
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote: I have two questions about the SPF plugin in SA. What is the difference between FAIL and SOFTFAIL on Helo? When running SA with bayes and network FAIL scores close to zero while SOFTFAIL gives a solid 3.1. Does FAIL hit a lot of ham? According to my stats, SPF_HELO_FAIL

about SPF

2005-04-11 Thread Arvinn Løkkebakken
I have two questions about the SPF plugin in SA. What is the difference between FAIL and SOFTFAIL on Helo? When running SA with bayes and network FAIL scores close to zero while SOFTFAIL gives a solid 3.1. Does FAIL hit a lot of ham? According to my stats, SPF_HELO_FAIL gets triggered about as o