Gabriel Millerd wrote:
On 5/11/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the "\d+_scores.cf" rules also can be a pain with sa-update which is a
> big part of the juggling.
Care to elaborate?
If you have a minimal configuration the mass-check scores will likely
bomb on your lint ch
On 5/11/07, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the "\d+_scores.cf" rules also can be a pain with sa-update which is a
> big part of the juggling.
Care to elaborate?
If you have a minimal configuration the mass-check scores will likely
bomb on your lint check. The names of the tw
Gabriel Millerd wrote:
In v3.2 it seems the reading of the /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.(pre|cf)
files is less forgiving. You used to be able to have the all in one
.cf file before v3.2. Likely your header rules are in a .cf file and
the sa-update is just reading the .pre file.
You could never put
In v3.2 it seems the reading of the /etc/mail/spamassassin/*.(pre|cf)
files is less forgiving. You used to be able to have the all in one
.cf file before v3.2. Likely your header rules are in a .cf file and
the sa-update is just reading the .pre file.
I had to juggle the /etc/mail/spamassassin fi
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 mei 2007 23:01
Aan: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Onderwerp: RE: SA Rules Auto-Update ?
- Original Message -
>Most common usage is:
>
>$ sa-update
>
>Or, if you want to see what i
