Got it. I thought it was a setup issue on my end. It didn't occur to me
that it could be a bug in hmailserver.
-
FROM: Groach
SENT: Friday, July 27, 2018 8:03 AM
TO: users@spamassassin.apache.org
SUBJECT: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Report
https://github.com/hmails
ilserver. Thanks.
>
>
>From: Reindl Harald
>Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 4:33 AM
>To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; ad...@123.dynu.com
>Subject: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Report
>
>> they are there
>>
>> let me guess you use dbma
OK. That explains why I've seen it that way in some examples online.
I'm running hmailserver. Thanks.
From: Reindl Harald
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 4:33 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org; ad...@123.dynu.com
Subject: Re: Line breaks in X-Spam-Rep
Hello. I was wondering if there is a setting to force line breaks in
X-Spam-Report. It's kind of a trivial issue, but it would be so much easier
to read. Like below as an example (that I manually altered). Many thanks.
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a rel
On Wed, 24 Jun 2015 17:14:37 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> You snipped out what I was specifically responding to:
>
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45 , Michael B Allen wrote:
>
> > bayes_file_mode 0777
Ok, I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to things being run as
root.
On 24 Jun 2015, at 16:21, RW wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
you explicitly mod
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:42:09 -0400
Bill Cole wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
> > So with a default install (CentOS 7 in my case and I suspect pretty
> > much all other systems), bayes will NOT just work by default unless
> > you explicitly modify /etc/mail/spamassassin/l
On 23 Jun 2015, at 14:58, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
really is).
But I want users to be able to put spams th
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
>> Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
>> and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
>> really is).
>>
>> But I want users to be able to put spams that get through into
>> ~/Maildir/.Learn
Am 23.06.2015 um 18:48 schrieb Bill Cole:
* sa-learn IS NOT THE RIGHT TOOL FOR LEARNING MESSAGES INTO A
SYSTEM-WIDE DB
says who? that below is the rsult of a customized sa-learn script for a
ton of users working like a charm on a spamass-milter setup for 10
months now
[root@mail-
On 23 Jun 2015, at 0:05, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassas
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 02:04:03 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> oh and independent of not running as root you have only 301 spam
> messages while the docs clearly state you need at least 400 ham as
> well as 400 spam samples
It's 200 of each.
Am 23.06.2015 um 03:45 schrieb Michael B Allen:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096
Am 23.06.2015 um 06:05 schrieb Michael B Allen:
Yes, I want a system-wide bayes db. And I am running spamd and spamc
and I assume that is all working (but of course I have no idea if it
really is).
But I want users to be able to put spams that get through into
~/Maildir/.LearnAsSpam and then, e
-token data: last expire
reduction count
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
how did you incporporate spamassassin to mail flow? Do you run milter,
amavisd, or simply spamc from procmailrc?
the bayes database you have shown belongs to user spamd, but the user does
not get all the
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bill Cole
wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
>> wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 110
On 22 Jun 2015, at 21:45, Michael B Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald
wrote:
[root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
/var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
[root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
total 1100
drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
> and after running sa-learn again (as root) on ham, my db is now broken:
>
> [root@www .spamassassin]# sa-learn --dump magic
> bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting! at
> /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mail/SpamAssassin/Ba
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> [root@www .spamassassin]# pwd
>> /var/log/spamassassin/.spamassassin
>> [root@www .spamassassin]# ls -la
>> total 1100
>> drwx-- 2 spamd spamd4096 Jun 22 19:42 .
>> drwx-- 3 spamd spamd4096 Jun 7 00:41 ..
>> -rw--- 1 spa
0 0 0 non-token data: last expire
again: SA don'trun as root in any sane setup and hence won't use *that*
bayes-db
reduction count
[root@www .spamassassin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spa
ssin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
see above
I'm using a default SA install on CentOS 7.
what is a "default install"?
it can be spamass-milter or anything else calling SA
Do I need a local.cf? From looking a
.spamassassin]# cat ../../maillog | grep BAYES
[root@www .spamassassin]#
I don't see any BAYES_ tags in X-Spam-Report.
I'm using a default SA install on CentOS 7.
Do I need a local.cf? From looking at the docs, it claims bayes is
enabled by default. How can I check this?
Or maybe I
> > > Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
> > > header of mail?
> > > Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
> > >
> > > X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via
> > >
> > On 01.08.09 07:01, router backup wrote:
> >> Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
> >> header of mail?
> >> Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
> >>
> >> X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Pass
2009/8/1 Matus UHLAR - fantomas :
> On 01.08.09 07:01, router backup wrote:
>> Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
>> header of mail?
>> Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
>>
>> X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED
On 01.08.09 07:01, router backup wrote:
> Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
> header of mail?
> Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
>
> X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via
> SMTP * 2.2 H
Hello,
Is there a directive to change the way X-Spam-Report formats in the
header of mail?
Currently I get a single X-Spam-Report line wrapped;
X-Spam-Report: * -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via
SMTP * 2.2 HIDE_WIN_STATUS RAW: Javascript to hide URLs in browser * 1.3
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 12:21 +0200, Matus UHLAR wrote:
> I often receive see mail where X-Spam-Report header is longer than 80
> characters. This causes mutt to re-wrap the header, which causes the header
> be hardly readable. Since SA already wraps other headers, can we consider
> that
Hello,
I often receive see mail where X-Spam-Report header is longer than 80
characters. This causes mutt to re-wrap the header, which causes the header
be hardly readable. Since SA already wraps other headers, can we consider
that as a bug or does that have an reason/option to tune?
Examples
Matt wrote:
> Is there a way to tell Spamassassin to add the detailed X-Spam-Report
> to every message rather then just those that have "X-Spam-Status:
> Yes"? Reason being is I want an easier way to study junk messages
> that get by Spamassassin.
Add this to your local
Matt wrote:
Is there a way to tell Spamassassin to add the detailed X-Spam-Report
to every message rather then just those that have "X-Spam-Status:
Yes"? Reason being is I want an easier way to study junk messages
that get by Spamassassin.
this depends on how you are running sp
Is there a way to tell Spamassassin to add the detailed X-Spam-Report
to every message rather then just those that have "X-Spam-Status:
Yes"? Reason being is I want an easier way to study junk messages
that get by Spamassassin.
Matt
So it looks like Entire Message doesn't let you search header content.
Anybody found a way to reliably search on the X-Spam-Report or X-Spam-
Status in Mail.app?
ort to all emails. Add it to the
user_prefs files to only add the report for certain recipients.
This produces the report header that looks like this:
X-Spam-Report:
* -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
* [score: 0.0023]
* 0.1 AWL AWL: From: addr
Thanks, I got it work. Was looking at report not summary.
Jonn
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:17:50 -0800
"Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-
- Original Message -
>I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
>X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-wich is
>working, and non-spam.
>
Jonn,
Sorry, here is how I do it.
fold_headers 1
clear_headers
add_header all Autolearn Autolearned as _AUTOLEARN
I am do not want to rewite the subject. I just want the
X-Spam-Report to be added to all email, spam-wich is
working, and non-spam.
Jonn
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:55:24 -0800
"Kevin W. Gagel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -
I tried to do it with the a
- Original Message -
>I tried to do it with the add_header option but I only get
>a blank line with X-Spam-Report. A little more info for
>you: SA 3.1, RH9, Perl 5.8.0, CGP 5.0-8, MySQL. I am
>calling spamd with spamc via scanspam.sh that is sending
>the user to spamc. I
I tried to do it with the add_header option but I only get
a blank line with X-Spam-Report. A little more info for
you: SA 3.1, RH9, Perl 5.8.0, CGP 5.0-8, MySQL. I am
calling spamd with spamc via scanspam.sh that is sending
the user to spamc. I am only adding headers to my email.
Jonn
On
uot;);
$line .= sprintf("hits=%2.1f required=%2.1f\n", $hits, $req);
if($_ = $myrpt) {
$Text::Wrap::columns = 74;
$Text::Wrap::huge = 'overflow';
$Text::Wrap::break = ';';
$line .= Text::Wrap::wrap("\ttests=", "\t ", $
Hi all,
Is it possible to have X-Spam-Report added to all email
headers(spam and non-spam) and if so how.
Jonn
> Xueron Nee wrote:
> > I use the default rules bounded with Mail::SpamAssassin,
> > and only do a little change in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
> >
> > report_safe 0
> >
> > And then I found that the inbound mail marked as SPAM was added a header
> &g
Xueron Nee wrote:
> I use the default rules bounded with Mail::SpamAssassin,
> and only do a little change in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
>
> report_safe 0
>
> And then I found that the inbound mail marked as SPAM was added a header
> like this:
> X-Spam-Report: =?ISO-
I use the default rules bounded with Mail::SpamAssassin,
and only do a little change in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
report_safe 0
And then I found that the inbound mail marked as SPAM was added a header
like this:
X-Spam-Report: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?
* 1.8 ROUND_THE_WORLD_LOCAL Received
Keith Amling wrote:
>>Fascinating the man page seems to indicate this is not one of the options
>>for add_header. They mention other headers but not "Report". I guess you
>>found a cheat.
>
> What is not one of the options? 'add_header', 'all', and '_REPORT_' are all
> mentioned directly in the p
From: "Keith Amling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fascinating the man page seems to indicate this is not one of the options
for add_header. They mention other headers but not "Report". I guess you
found a cheat.
What is not one of the options? 'add_header', 'all', and '_REPORT_' are
all
mentioned direc
> Fascinating the man page seems to indicate this is not one of the options
> for add_header. They mention other headers but not "Report". I guess you
> found a cheat.
What is not one of the options? 'add_header', 'all', and '_REPORT_' are all
mentioned directly in the perldoc for Conf. How is my
> is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
Depends on what you are using to integrate SA. If you are using spamd, yes.
Some of the other tools that make their own headers, no.
Loren
From: "Keith Amling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
I note
$self->{headers_spam}->{"Report"} = "_REPORT_";
in Conf.pm which amounts to the configuration
add_header spam Report _REPORT_
works perfectly. thanks dude!
-Matt
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Amling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2005 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: enabable x-spam-report in all emails ham or spam
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-repo
> is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
I note
$self->{headers_spam}->{"Report"} = "_REPORT_";
in Conf.pm which amounts to the configuration
add_header spam Report _REPORT_
I wanted the exact same thing you want and
add_he
From: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Matthew Lenz wrote:
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all
emails?
-matt
Well, there is no "X-Spam-Report" header made by SA's defaul
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Matthew Lenz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: enabable x-spam-report in all emails ham or spam
Matthew Lenz wrote:
is it possible to e
Matthew Lenz wrote:
> is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
> -matt
>
Well, there is no "X-Spam-Report" header made by SA's default configuration.
By default SA does add X-Spam-Status to all messages, which would include the
score an
is it possible to enable the addition of the x-spam-report in all emails?
-matt
Hi,
I'm running SA 3.0.0 on Mandrake 10.1. Emails are passed from postfix to
procmail and procmail passes each email to /usr/bin/spamassassin. I
would like to know how to get it to show the X-Spam-Report headers for
all messages, not just the ones it thinks are spam. I want to see what
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:29:44PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> clear_report_template
> report _SUMMARY_
>
> "fixes" my problem, but it seems odd that local cf directives aren't.
Hrm. As far as I can tell, there's no way to get the contents of the
"report" config into the header without modifyin
On Jan 24, 2005, at 3:19 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:41:47PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
-D is debug, it's not related to logging level (there is no "verbose
loggi
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 02:41:47PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
> regarding X-Spam-Report.
-D is debug, it's not related to logging level (there is no "verbose logging"
option iirc).
> Unfortunate
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/24/2005 04:41:47 PM:
> Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
> regarding X-Spam-Report.
>
> Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to manually munging 10_misc.cf.
>
>
Thanks Ranier--That works, unfortunately spamd doesn't log anything
regarding X-Spam-Report.
Unfortunately for me I'll have to resort to manually munging 10_misc.cf.
On Jan 24, 2005, at 2:14 PM, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:27:35PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
Does sp
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 01:27:35PM -0800, Paul Smicker wrote:
> Does spamd have a verbose logging option?
-D (at least in 3.0.2)
Rainer
ystem..." preamble and content preview from
> my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
>
> I have in local.cf:
>
> report_safe 0
> remove_header all Report
> add_header all Report score=_SCORE_ tests=_TESTS_
>
> But I still get the verbose version. I'
mble and content preview
from
> my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
>
> I have in local.cf:
>
> report_safe 0
> remove_header all Report
> add_header all Report score=_SCORE_ tests=_TESTS_
>
> But I still get the verbose version. I'm running spamd with
"Paul Smicker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote on 01/24/2005 01:19:28 PM:
> Hi All--
>
> I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
> software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview
from
> my X-Spam-Report he
Hi All--
I've been trying for the past few days to remove the "Spam detection
software, running on the system..." preamble and content preview from
my X-Spam-Report header, with no success.
I have in local.cf:
report_safe 0
remove_header all Report
add_header all Report scor
On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Roel Bindels murmured woefully:
> Can anyone help me with my problem. I do not want SA to set the
> X-Spam-Report: tag in the mail header or mailbody, but I can't find the
> option how to set this.
remove_header X-Spam-Report
--
`The sword we forged has turned
Hello Listers,
Can anyone help me with my problem. I do not want SA to set the
X-Spam-Report: tag in the mail header or mailbody, but I can't find the
option how to set this.
Any help would be welcome.
I'm using SA 3.0.1 and below are my settings.
rewrite_subject 0
use_ters
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Roel Bindels wrote:
> use_terse_report
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking, but the above option is invalid.
You need to specify 0 or 1 after it depending on whether or not you want
a terse report.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
>Ever heard of .cshrc?
Hello Listers
I have added the remove_header, and now the report only appears on a mail
flagged as spam. But I do not want that report to be there. How can I fix
this?
Is my remove_header on the wrong place?
I just want the mail to be flagged with spam or ham.
rewrite_subject 0
report_safe 0
rem
>
> With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent
> the "X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam
> messages. Is this
> a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
>
I did not confirm X-Spam-Report, but you cant get rid of
X-C
At 12:44 PM 9/24/2004, Matt Garretson wrote:
With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent the
"X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam messages. Is this
a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
### +++
required_score 8.0
clear_headers
report_safe 0
It
With SA 3.0, using clear_headers in local.cf does not prevent the
"X-Spam-Report:" header from being inserted into spam messages. Is this
a bug or a feature? Below is my local.cf.
### +++
required_score 8.0
clear_headers
report_safe 0
use_dcc 0
use_pyzor 0
use_razor2 0
dns_ava
73 matches
Mail list logo
