Re: shouldn't SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?

2012-01-06 Thread RW
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 22:12:09 +1300 Jason Haar wrote: > Hi Henrik > > I tried that - didn't make a difference. > > In debug mode, it certainly made the IP address show up against > X-Spam-Relays-External - but no RBL lookups against it occurred? That > conflicts wi

Re: shouldn't SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?

2012-01-06 Thread Henrik K
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:12:09PM +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > Hi Henrik > > I tried that - didn't make a difference. > > In debug mode, it certainly made the IP address show up against > X-Spam-Relays-External - but no RBL lookups against it occurred? That > conflicts

Re: shouldn't SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?

2012-01-06 Thread Jason Haar
Hi Henrik I tried that - didn't make a difference. In debug mode, it certainly made the IP address show up against X-Spam-Relays-External - but no RBL lookups against it occurred? That conflicts with the man page: "These IP addresses are virtually appended into the Received: chain, s

Re: shouldn't SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?

2012-01-05 Thread Henrik K
both from 41.184.112.222 > > Could X-EN-OrigIP: and X-PHP-Script: be added to X-Spam-Relays-External > so as to pick up the originating IP? Rewriting that IP into a Received > header pushed the score up by 10 points due to the RBLs it's in > > PS: pastebin.com picked both

shouldn't SA treat certain web-script headers as X-Spam-Relays-External?

2012-01-05 Thread Jason Haar
Hi there I just had the following phishing attacks get through with scores in the 2s. http://pastebin.com/4Yyc0m7j http://pastebin.com/R0XMM9Je Both are generated by different hacked websites - both from 41.184.112.222 Could X-EN-OrigIP: and X-PHP-Script: be added to X-Spam-Relays-External so

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Ned Slider
On 29/06/11 12:50, Henrik K wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote: Hi List, I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd really like to be able to specifically check is the

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:28:48PM +0300, Henrik K wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > > Hi List, > > > > I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd > > really like to be able to specifically check is the L

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread RW
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:01:54 +0100 Ned Slider wrote: > > Yes, _LASTEXTERNALRDNS_ would certainly work as the connecting IP has > rDNS that matches the string I was trying to match. > > Where might I find examples of TEMPLATE TAGS usage? It's unclear to > me how to use these options so some exa

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:05:58 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: Who said anything about trusting the IP ? I simply want to verify that the email was relayed to me from a particular ISP as part of a meta rule. The very fact that the hostname(s) do have many IPs is the reason for matching that rather than

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Ned Slider
On 29/06/11 11:24, Benny Pedersen wrote: On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:02:13 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: header __RCVD_FROM_SOMEISP X-Spam-Relays-Last-External =~ /someisp\.com/i bad rule, hostnames can have more then one ip, would you trust every ip now ? Who said anything about trusting the IP ?

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Ned Slider
On 29/06/11 11:12, Axb wrote: On 2011-06-29 12:02, Ned Slider wrote: Hi List, I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal. Is there a X-Spam-R

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Henrik K
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:02:13AM +0100, Ned Slider wrote: > Hi List, > > I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd > really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External > header as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal. &g

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Benny Pedersen
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:02:13 +0100, Ned Slider wrote: header __RCVD_FROM_SOMEISP X-Spam-Relays-Last-External =~ /someisp\.com/i bad rule, hostnames can have more then one ip, would you trust every ip now ? better would be to extend ASN plugin to have whitelist specific ASN or blacklist

Re: X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Axb
On 2011-06-29 12:02, Ned Slider wrote: Hi List, I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal. Is there a X-Spam-Relays-Last-External option tha

X-Spam-Relays-External

2011-06-29 Thread Ned Slider
Hi List, I see the useful X-Spam-Relays-External pseudo header but what I'd really like to be able to specifically check is the Last External header as DNSBL rules are able to do with -lastexternal. Is there a X-Spam-Relays-Last-External option that I'm missing, and if not w