Tracee wrote:
Good questions. Not being the one who configures SpamAssassin, I
thought it might be configured to know it's own domain name.
You could write a rule on a site-by-site basis, or perhaps introduce a
configuration option. Even then, it wouldn't work quite right for sites
that rec
Good questions. Not being the one who configures SpamAssassin, I thought it might be configured to know it's own domain name.If the header "indicates the original domain *to which the message was sent*" then I guess I was misinterpretting the meaning.Thanks for the input.- Original Message ---
Tracee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm a little green to SA & its rules but wouldn't it make sense to have
> a rule that acts upon the
>
> X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain: your.domain.here header?
>
> If it matches your own domain name then give it high rating. There must
> be a good reason why SA
Tracee wrote:
I'm a little green to SA & its rules but wouldn't it make sense to have
a rule that acts upon the
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain: your.domain.here header?
If it matches your own domain name then give it high rating. There must
be a good reason why SA hasn't done this alread
Tracee wrote:
>
> I'm a little green to SA & its rules but wouldn't it make sense to
> have a rule that acts upon the
>
> X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain: your.domain.here header?
>
> If it matches your own domain name then give it high rating. There
> must be a good reason why SA hasn't don
Hi guys, I'm a little green to SA & its rules but wouldn't it make sense to have a rule that acts upon the X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain: your.domain.here header? If it matches your own domain name then give it high rating. There must be a good reason why SA hasn't done this already so I'd li
