On 02.08.08 13:10, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Sorry for the huge delay in responding...
Better than not at all...
> >> On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >>> I was also thinking about modifying it to be allowed to hit more times
> >>> with
> >>> different scores for smaller time
Hi Matus,
Sorry for the huge delay in responding...
On 03/07/2008 4:50 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 11.06.08 15:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>> I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it
On 11.06.08 15:40, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it very good
> > idea and I was explicitly searching for it), but I'd like to ask a few
> > quest
Hello,
On 30.05.08 11:46, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it very good
> idea and I was explicitly searching for it), but I'd like to ask a few
> questions, if someone of you uses it:
>
> - did you modify sc
Hello,
I'd like to use WrongMX plugin on our mailservers (I found it very good idea
and I was explicitly searching for it), but I'd like to ask a few questions,
if someone of you uses it:
- did you modify score of it?
- did you modify the maximum time difference allowed for the plu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daryl C. W. O'Shea writes:
> The mail system it was designed for has four primary MXes (all
> preference 0) multihomed with connections from three different networks.
> A secondary MX was added mainly to attract spam. [...]
BTW, related: a good w
ngs to mails in my case. I understand.
If you're running SA on your secondaries, you could just save yourself the
effort and add +1.0 to every email.
Hm, nice idea ;-)
I wrote the WrongMX plugin for a regional ISP that a friend owns. As
Matt said, it was designed to run only on a primary MX, o
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:58:23AM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Hi,
> Disclaimer: I've never used the plugin, but I can casually read the code...
Lucky you ;-)
> wrongmx needs to run on your primary, and will detect that mail first went
> through one of your secondaries before hitting the primar
At 10:41 AM 12/28/2004, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
is someone here using $SUBJECT from
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WrongMXPlugin ?
Here, it seems to do nothing :-(
A mail sent to a secondary MX:
-8<
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 28 15:18:28 2004
Received: from hcou105200.catv.ppp.infow
Hi all,
is someone here using $SUBJECT from
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/WrongMXPlugin ?
Here, it seems to do nothing :-(
A mail sent to a secondary MX:
-8<
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 28 15:18:28 2004
Received: from hcou105200.catv.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp
(hcou105200.catv.ppp.inf
Good afternoon,
For those interested, I've uploaded to the Wiki, and attached for your
convenience, a plugin to detect when an email was sent to a secondary or
lower preference MX server when a higher preference MX server was likely
to have been available (the message was passed to the higher pr
11 matches
Mail list logo
