spamd: result: Y 5 -
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VERIFIED,DK_SIGNED,DK_VERIFIED,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,
HTML_MESSAGE,INVALID_DATE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MISSING_MIMEOLE,SPF_PASS
My guess, and only a guess, is that the mail message might somehow have been
corrupted on the first try, and "fixed" by th
Jason Haar wrote:
>
> spamd: result: . 1 -
> DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
>
>
I can at least answer the DomainKey differences now. Exchange likes
removing headers it thinks aren't necessary - so although Dell is
signing their emails, the headers don't show up in
We are seeing SA-3.2.0 acting strangely/inconsistently on our FC3 servers
Ever since upgrading from 3.1.8 to 3.2.0, we have started tagging HAM
that we never had problems with before. e.g. we just had it tag email
from Dell as spam with scores >5 as follows:
spamd: result: Y 5 -
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM
