On fre 27 aug 2010 23:47:54 CEST, Alex wrote
Hi,
I'm still having some difficulty with trusted_networks, and believe it
may be a result of a DNS issue?
trosted_networks on hostnames ?
just kidding right ?
Yes, but it is among the relays in the Received: headers, so I thought
this is how
Hi,
I'm still having some difficulty with trusted_networks, and believe it
may be a result of a DNS issue?
>> Yes, but it is among the relays in the Received: headers, so I thought
>> this is how it determines the last external server, or the first
>> trusted server, as the case may be?
>>
> Well
[just realized my response was inadvertently sent directly to Matt, sorry]
Hi,
>> What am I missing? Shouldn't there be an "ip=" entry for
>> smtp01.example.com? I have trusted_networks defined in local.cf, and
>> it includes the smtp01.example.com server.
>
> Um, no. smtp01.example.com is your o
On 8/24/2010 1:13 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
For clarity: assuming your MTA inserts a Return-Path: header, or adds a
clause to the Received header about the envelope sender, whitelist_from_rcvd
will match against it, in addition to the From: header, and several other
"from-like" headers. (however Res
Hi,
> For clarity: assuming your MTA inserts a Return-Path: header, or adds a
> clause to the Received header about the envelope sender, whitelist_from_rcvd
> will match against it, in addition to the From: header, and several other
> "from-like" headers. (however Resent-From should take priority
On 8/21/2010 1:27 AM, Henrik K wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:16:58AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
You need to use _envelope_ sender (e.g. Return-Path), not From.
Never mind, I was confusing it with spf and read the docs..
For clarity: assuming your MTA inserts a Return-Path: header, or adds a
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 08:16:58AM +0300, Henrik K wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:39:05PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > On 8/20/2010 9:09 PM, Alex wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >I'm trying to use whitelist_from_rcvd and it doesn't appear to be
> > >working. I'm trying to whitelist mail from the
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:39:05PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> On 8/20/2010 9:09 PM, Alex wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm trying to use whitelist_from_rcvd and it doesn't appear to be
> >working. I'm trying to whitelist mail from the AZ lottery. Here are
> >the headers from the email:
> >
> >Received: f
On 8/20/2010 9:09 PM, Alex wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to use whitelist_from_rcvd and it doesn't appear to be
working. I'm trying to whitelist mail from the AZ lottery. Here are
the headers from the email:
Received: from AZMTAQS01.AZ.GOV (azmtaprd01.az.gov [159.87.126.8])
From: "Arizona Lottery"
Is
Hi,
I'm trying to use whitelist_from_rcvd and it doesn't appear to be
working. I'm trying to whitelist mail from the AZ lottery. Here are
the headers from the email:
Received: from AZMTAQS01.AZ.GOV (azmtaprd01.az.gov [159.87.126.8])
From: "Arizona Lottery"
Isn't this the proper way to use this?
On 12.03.08 10:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Even though it did not meet SA's threshold, the e-mails are still going to
> users Spam Box instead of their inbox. Maybe I should have made that more
> clear , sorry for the confusion.
it's not SA issue then. SA only classifies mail, it's something
message.
John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/11/2008 05:28 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
Re: Whitelist Question
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 10.0 required)
Also: it didn't cross you
On 11.03.08 17:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here is the full header. But also the local.cf has around 12000 entries,
> is that a problem.
WHAT? 12000 entries? What the hell are you doing with that?
> Received: from smtp1.citigroup.com ([199.67.179.116]
> helo=mail.citigroup.com)
>
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 10.0 required)
Also: it didn't cross your spam threshold, so what are you complaining
about?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZhttp://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]FALaholic #1117
, is prohibited and
may be unlawful. If you have received this E-Mail message in error, notify
the sender by reply E-Mail and delete the message.
Randy Ramsdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/11/2008 05:22 PM
To
users@spamassassin.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Whitelist Question
[EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the header info. What is the alternate solution to using
whitelist_from ? I been also trying to setup AWL via MySQL.no
luck on that.
I use Exim for mail then , it relays to Lotus Domino.if that helps.
Content analysis details: (5.7 points, 10.0 re
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the header info.
*screenshots*? During the day I use a text-only mail client, so I can't
look at them for you until tonight unless you post the text version of the
full message headers. I can't say whether anyone else will bother to look.
ibited and
may be unlawful. If you have received this E-Mail message in error, notify
the sender by reply E-Mail and delete the message.
John Hardin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/11/2008 12:47 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject
Re: Whitelist Question
On Tue, 11
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file "whitelist_from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but they still get tagged as Spam, is there a
altnerative solution.
(1) Don't use whitelist_from, it is too easy for spammers to spoof. Use
one of the other whitelist
Sure - a procmail recipe would work.
Or, provide an example header and an example entry from your local.cf
so maybe someone here can see if there's something incorrect.
At 09:39 AM 3/11/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file "whitelist_from
[EMAIL PROTEC
I add users to whitelist in the local.cf file "whitelist_from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" but they still get tagged as Spam, is there a
altnerative solution.
- Jeremy
Joe Zitnik wrote:
> How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown
> to be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
> whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
> listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for
>
Hi
> How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown to
> be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
> whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
> listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for just
> a word in
How would I whitelist mail from a listserv? Since the mail is shown to
be from the user who sent it and not the listserv, I can't do a
whitelist_from. Would it be easier to make a rule to look for the
listserv domain in the header? How would I make a rule to look for just
a word in the header, r
Jean-Paul Natola wrote on Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:06:49 -0500:
> I she
> tried using their SMTP but then I get this in the log
>
> 2005-12-05 13:48:59 H=dsl-201-128-150-16.prod-infinitum.com.mx (acerL1)
> [201.128.150.16] F=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rejected RCPT
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: relay not perm
Send the email through Prodigy's smarthost according to Prodigy's rules.
The log line quoted indicates a rejection of a dialup ID without proper
authentication. Most properly setup email systems prohibit the relaying.
Note that what you see there is not a SpamAssassin issue. Expertise may
exist h
At 09:06 PM 12/6/2005, Jean-Paul Natola wrote:
I have a user in Mexico that uses prodigy broadband, she claims that if she
tries to send email with her outlook using our SMTP they wont let her, I she
tried using their SMTP but then I get this in the log
2005-12-05 13:48:59 H=dsl-201-128-150-
I have a user in Mexico that uses prodigy broadband, she claims that if she
tries to send email with her outlook using our SMTP they wont let her, I she
tried using their SMTP but then I get this in the log
2005-12-05 13:48:59 H=dsl-201-128-150-16.prod-infinitum.com.mx (acerL1)
[201.128.150.16
I am running Spamassassin version 2.60 on a Redhat 8.0 mail server.
I have a couple of addresses that I would like to remove from the AWL but when
I have tried:
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist=addr
The process appears to run forever, with no effect. Well, almost no effect, I
At 04:03 PM 7/14/2005, Dr Robert Young wrote:
One more whitelist question
if the whitelist database file is "deleted", then spamassassin will create
a new one ( by itself) and start collecting information from the
beginning, correct?
AFIAK yes, although to avoid race cond
One more whitelist question
if the whitelist database file is "deleted", then spamassassin will
create a new one ( by itself) and start collecting information from the
beginning, correct?
Dr. Robert Young
AL
I am not sure if there is a whitelist_subject, an allow rule would accomplish
the same thing
headerSUBJ_ALLOW_RULE_1 Subject =~ /words go here/i
describe SUBJ_ALLOW_RULE_1 Subject ALLOW Rule for words go here
score SUBJ_ALLOW_RULE_1 -15.0
--Bryan
>>> "Timothy Rich
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 03:51:00PM -0600, Timothy Richter wrote:
> I have made whitelist_from exceptions and whitelist_to exceptions.
> Is it possible to make a exception in the whitelist file by subject?
> I am guessing it would be whitelist_subject .
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/Whit
Good Afternoon,
I have made whitelist_from exceptions and whitelist_to exceptions. Is it
possible to make a exception in the whitelist file by subject? I am guessing
it would be whitelist_subject .
Thanks,
Tim
34 matches
Mail list logo
