Martin Gregorie wrote:
Clarification: I, for one, was only proposing that the whitelisting
plugins and rules that query external databases are removed from the
standard ruleset and sa_update and placed in a separate library of
optional rules.
My reasons for making this suggestion are:
-
Thank you.
--
Robert Lopez
Unix Systems Administrator
Central New Mexico Community College (CNM)
525 Buena Vista SE
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106
On Sat, 05 Dec 2009 11:38:46 +0100
Per Jessen wrote:
> Robert Lopez wrote:
>
> You go study the ruleset that you are using. I know it's tedious, but
> if you want to know how and what you're filtering, it's the only way.
>
There aren't all that many with significant scores
$ cd /var/db/spa
Robert Lopez wrote:
> I have been reading other threads about white list problems.
>
> In the past week this college has been phished very successfully two
> times. Each time the rules I added to increase the score of college
> specific phishing email were counter balanced.
> On Saturday night it
I have been reading other threads about white list problems.
In the past week this college has been phished very successfully two times.
Each time the rules I added to increase the score of college specific
phishing email were counter balanced.
On Saturday night it was the white-list score from RC
On fre 23 okt 2009 14:09:02 CEST, "McDonald, Dan" wrote
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 03:34 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
Does SA support host name based black/white lists?
like whitelist_rcvd_from ?
or whitelist_from_rcvd ?
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
--
xpoint
On Fri, 2009-10-23 at 03:34 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Does SA support host name based black/white lists?
like whitelist_rcvd_from ?
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281, CNX
www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Does SA support host name based black/white lists? I suppose to do it
right you might have to pick a specific received line to get the host
that sent you the email, do FCrDNS, and then do the lookup.
Is something like this available? I'm doing it in Exim on my system, but
Exim has the
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Thus, any reputable blacklist service will ALSO need to constantly
monitor to make sure that any IP that's listed still deserves to be
there.
Absolutely. I keep forgetting that anyone would think otherwise; major spam
sources haven't been stationary in years.
--
J.D
J.D. Falk wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Not true. There are servers that say send out bank statements and
100% of
what it sends is bank statements.
Until the day those servers get hacked, or they take on a new client
who sends a different type of mail, etc.
That's why any serious 3rd party whi
Aaron Wolfe wrote:
Not true. There are servers that say send out bank statements and 100% of
what it sends is bank statements.
Until the day those servers get hacked, or they take on a new client
who sends a different type of mail, etc.
That's why any serious 3rd party whitelist service will
ingle lump.
RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED 0 -4.3 0 -4.3
RCVD_IN_IADB_DOPTIN_GT50 0
RCVD_IN_IADB_ML_DOPTIN 0 -6 0 -6
RCVD_IN_IADB_VOUCHED 0 -2.2 0 -2.2
RCVD_IN_SSC_TRUSTED_COI 0 -3.7 0 -3.7
These practically don't exist, if you look at ruleqa.
For what it's worth there are really only 3
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
> Warren Togami wrote:
>>
>> On 10/12/2009 09:18 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
>>>
>>> For what it's worth there are really only 3 serious white lists on the
>>> planet. I'm surprised no
Warren Togami wrote:
On 10/12/2009 09:18 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth there are really only 3 serious white lists on the
planet. I'm surprised no one is
testing the emailreg list. There are dozens of black lists. Doing white
lists is actually easier than doing
b
On 10/12/2009 09:18 AM, Marc Perkel wrote:
For what it's worth there are really only 3 serious white lists on the
planet. I'm surprised no one is
testing the emailreg list. There are dozens of black lists. Doing white
lists is actually easier than doing
black lists because there are th
only 3 serious white lists on the
planet. I'm surprised no one is
testing the emailreg list. There are dozens of black lists. Doing white
lists is actually easier than doing
black lists because there are thousands of servers out there that send
nothing but good email. That have
good FcRDNS, th
At 01:08 PM 10/22/2004, Daniel A. de Araujo wrote:
I am having some problems when the users access some pages that has the
"send this article to a friend" resource, because the message arrives with
the sender´s address that is filled in the page and not with a specific
account.
So its impossible
"Daniel A. de Araujo" wrote:
> I am having some problems when the users access some pages that has
> the "send this article to a friend" resource, because the message
> arrives with the sender´s address that is filled in the page and not
> with a specific account.
> So its impossible to set the add
Hi
guys,
I am having some
problems when the users access some pages that has the "send this article to a
friend" resource, because the message arrives with the sender´s address
that is filled in the page and not with a specific account.
So its impossible to
set the address as a white-li
19 matches
Mail list logo
