You are correct that I had not moved my bayes db. I have the bayes_toks
file. But as I expected, the log says:
warn: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/root/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
Googling this, I'm pretty sure this means that I have a db version
mismatch. I was o
>> I recently migrated SA to a new environment with a clean install. I
added the KAM rules and a short rules file of my own. But I'm obviously
missing some pretty basic rules that I believe I had in the old environment.
> or Bayes by the look of it.
Did you have bayes working on the old setup?
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:51:38 +
Riccardo Alfieri wrote:
> On 21/11/19 19:02, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
>
> >
> > X-SpamAssassin_109: Content preview: Just to Say
> > Hellohttp://www.eyestrongpro.icu/l/lt172P21166EE1247K/1884YQ6160P10097IT163UE64992145HF620698297
> > X-SpamAssassin_110:Unsubscr
On 21/11/19 22:02, Benny Pedersen wrote:
thats why is say not using spamassassin, spamassassin add headers that
begin with X-Spam
I think he is calling spamc, that connects to spamd, that by default in
many distributions starts with "--local" (never understood why)
Headers are probably ad
On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 13:56 -0600, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
> I just want to know if everyone who installs SA is expected to go in
> and modify all of the rule scores in order to get more that 1-2%
> effectiveness of SA? I can't believe that is the case. Is there
> really not a single rule that come
Riccardo Alfieri skrev den 2019-11-21 21:51:
Check here for hints:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/spamassassin/UsingNetworkTests
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
localhost.junc.eu
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.8, required=5.0, Autolearn=no
autolearn_force
Jerry Malcolm skrev den 2019-11-21 21:31:
I'm not sure what you mean by not using SpamAssassin, rather a glue
(??). I am calling SA from Apache JAMES. I'm simply adding the SA
results as headers in the email I'm not doing anything that would
affect the score of an email.
mailling list need m
On 21/11/19 19:02, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
X-SpamAssassin_109: Content preview: Just to Say
Hellohttp://www.eyestrongpro.icu/l/lt172P21166EE1247K/1884YQ6160P10097IT163UE64992145HF620698297
X-SpamAssassin_110:Unsubscribe Here [...]
It looks to me that you are not using network checks. eyest
I'm not sure what you mean by not using SpamAssassin, rather a glue
(??). I am calling SA from Apache JAMES. I'm simply adding the SA
results as headers in the email I'm not doing anything that would
affect the score of an email.
On 11/21/2019 2:26 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Jerry Malcolm s
Jerry Malcolm skrev den 2019-11-21 20:56:
I realize that some score 0.
good, maybe spammers are testing default scores before thay even try to
send it ?
But that's what I received out of the
box from SA.
as i see headers you are not using spamassassin, but some other glues
that use spam
I realize that some score 0. But that's what I received out of the box
from SA. I could raise the score on "received from an IPv4 address".
But is that really going to help SA differentiate "I want your sex"
content from a billion other emails that come from an IPv4 address.
I guess I'm jus
Jerry Malcolm skrev den 2019-11-21 20:11:
Doesn't this kinda defeat the purpose of Spam Assassin?
you have rules hitting with 0.0, if you change scores on them then it is
detected as spam
sorry for not posting on maillist :=)
Benny,
Doesn't this kinda defeat the purpose of Spam Assassin? Yes, I could
add a rule that says if the body has the word Asian in it, then add
5.0. That would fix this one. I could also make .icu TLD score 5.
That will mean if I ever get this email again, it will indeed be caught
as spam
I recently migrated SA to a new environment with a clean install. I
added the KAM rules and a short rules file of my own. But I'm obviously
missing some pretty basic rules that I believe I had in the old
environment. Just as an example (one of hundreds...), today I received
an email about As
14 matches
Mail list logo
