On Mon, 12 Apr 2021, jwmi...@gmail.com wrote:
John Hardin writes:
> From: John Hardin
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> >> 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> >> [score:
John Hardin writes:
> From: John Hardin
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 07:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
>
> On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> >> 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> >> [score: 1.]
> >> 0.5 BAYES_999
On 2021-04-12 16:29, John Hardin wrote:
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Loren Wilton wrote:
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to
100%
[score: 1.]
0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to
100%
On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Loren Wilton wrote:
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.]
0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.]
I have
5.0 BAYES_99
However, in 50_scores.cf, this line is commented out:
#score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM 0 0.5 0 0.5
Maybe that's the problem?
no, there are other SORBS lists used:
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 2.499 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 # n=0 n=1
However, in 50_scores.cf, this line is commented out:
#score RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM 0 0.5 0 0.5
Maybe that's the problem?
no, there are other SORBS lists used:
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0 0.001 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_HTTP 0 2.499 0 0.001 # n=0 n=2
score RCVD_IN_SORBS_MISC 0 # n=0
sorbs dnsbl missing, have you denied sorbs.net results ?, or is
spamassassin not testing sorbs.net anymore ?
On 11.04.21 18:22, Steve Dondley wrote:
Best I can tell, my SA config should be testing for sorbs. I've got
this line in /etc/spamassassin/v3220.pre:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plu
If you have spamples for sharepoint phishes that evade kam ruleset, shoot
me an email off-list to discuss getting me the spamples.
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021, 16:43 Steve Dondley wrote:
> On 2021-04-11 04:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:
> >
> >> Content analy
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 1.]
0.5 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
[score: 1.]
I have
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probabilit
sorbs dnsbl missing, have you denied sorbs.net results ?, or is
spamassassin not testing sorbs.net anymore ?
Best I can tell, my SA config should be testing for sorbs. I've got this
line in /etc/spamassassin/v3220.pre:
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DNSEval
And in /usr/share/spama
Also, I've heard of sorbs over the years but I'm not sure exactly what
it is. Is this the same block list run by Cisco?
OK, I was getting SORBS confused with SenderBase Reputation Score
(SBRS). That's the one run by Cisco, I believe.
I actually have an account on the SORBS website that I s
sorbs dnsbl missing, have you denied sorbs.net results ?, or is
spamassassin not testing sorbs.net anymore ?
How would I check if it's turned on? I tried grepping in
/etc/spamassassin on "sorb" (case insensitive) and found nothing. So I
guess it's not in my default config.
I see many men
On 2021-04-11 22:43, Steve Dondley wrote:
On 2021-04-11 04:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:
Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
---
On 2021-04-11 04:19 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:
Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
3.5 BAYES_99 BO
On 2021-04-11 22:09, Steve Dondley wrote:
Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
--
--
3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
I've received about a dozen phishing attack emails from Microsoft's
sharepoint service within the last couple of weeks. Only one of them was
identified by SA as spam. After running the emails through sa-learn,
they still only score a 4 to 4.5. But I could see that it would be easy
for these ema
16 matches
Mail list logo
