On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 7:28:53 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been watching some of the misses that have passed through
> spamassassin (3.0.4) lately and they are pretty clean; no DNS BL hits,
> etc.
> One thing I did notice is that many of them have a fairly contorted URL
>
>...
>On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
>> Sounds like an surbl problem if spamsite.com isn't listed.
>
>That's just an example I made up... :)
>...
Bad choice of example: spamsite. com is an actual "spamsite".
The domain "example.com" is reserved for exactly this type of usage
a
> OK, so that's supposed to happen. Is there any way to have the entire
> host checked? I've seen a good volume of junk where the domain is clean,
> but if I do a manual lookup on the entire hostname in the spam it is
> indeed listed.
I *suspect* what is happening here is that the domain isn't i
re a few cases where things go
to three levels rather than just two, but they are exceptions.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:28 PM
Subject: URIDNSBL and subdomains
Hello,
I've b
than just two, but they are exceptions.
Loren
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Sprickman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2005 7:28 PM
Subject: URIDNSBL and subdomains
> Hello,
>
> I've been watching some of the misses that
Hello,
I've been watching some of the misses that have passed through
spamassassin (3.0.4) lately and they are pretty clean; no DNS BL hits,
etc.
One thing I did notice is that many of them have a fairly contorted URL
for the spamvertized products, ie:
kjekliennxi&ffiennnkenc.spamsite.com
